- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
- Messages
- 5,726
- Reaction Score
- 30,073
IMO and after review neither rose to the level of flagrant. The second under the basket could've been called a foul but neither of the two visible refs had a good line of sight. Correct me if I'm wrong the refs can review for a flagrant but they cannot call a common foul on a review where no foul was called initially.
Correct but they can change a foul to no foul of the call is challenged