Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 995 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

For comparison here are the NCAA Tournament stats for Dayton, an BE expansion darling here at the Boneyard, and St. Louis, who is also often mentioned.

Dayton - 4 appearances and 2 wins (3 if you include a First Four round win)
St Louis - 1 appearance

Memphis is on par with those two, and imo has higher upside than either. You can disagree with it, but it’s not egregious.

For additional comparison, let’s look at some current BE teams:
Seton Hall: 5 appearances, 1 win
St. John’s: 3 appearances, 1 win
Georgetown: 2 apperences, 1 win
DePaul: …

Memphis would do at least as well as 1/3 of the membership and probably benefit from a recruiting bump from being part of the BE.
 
I love how Dan Wolken’s take about Memphis splitting their sports is the opposite of what he thought about UConn. And he’s given a reason why we did it as support for Memphis (and it worked for us). Hypocrite much?
I think he either lives or used to live in Memphis. Even last year he was saying that Memphis was the best G5 school despite Boise going undefeated (minus a 3 point loss at Oregon). He’s a homer.
 
With the advent of the House verdict and NIL, I get the feeling that a school's success in basketball will become almost irrelevant in the realignment discussion. A school with a poor win-loss history will be able to buy a 15 man or 15 woman team overnight.
"become irrelevant?" We passed that station a long time ago. Exhibit A: UConn

That's probably what the P4 are afraid of. They know basketball schools in the short term have more salary available for basketball than P4 do.
 
With the advent of the House verdict and NIL, I get the feeling that a school's success in basketball will become almost irrelevant in the realignment discussion. A school with a poor win-loss history will be able to buy a 15 man or 15 woman team overnight.
Yeah cuz it’s been going great for Kansas St, USC, Washington, etc
 
That's probably what the P4 are afraid of. They know basketball schools in the short term have more salary available for basketball than P4 do.

Isnt that only true if FB is a money loser or is there a school salary cap? As I'm typing this I'm thinking the latter may be the case but hard to keep up with all the developments.
 
"become irrelevant?" We passed that station a long time ago. Exhibit A: UConn

That's probably what the P4 are afraid of. They know basketball schools in the short term have more salary available for basketball than P4 do.

Nope. If you are poor and you don’t have a pool you are still poor.
 
With the advent of the House verdict and NIL, I get the feeling that a school's success in basketball will become almost irrelevant in the realignment discussion. A school with a poor win-loss history will be able to buy a 15 man or 15 woman team overnight.
Not true. Most football schools will invest their revenue share in football over basketball. And, "real" NIL is going to be limited to a fewer players who actually earn it.
 
With the advent of the House verdict and NIL, I get the feeling that a school's success in basketball will become almost irrelevant in the realignment discussion. A school with a poor win-loss history will be able to buy a 15 man or 15 woman team overnight.
dream wants GIF by SoulPancake
 
With the advent of the House verdict and NIL, I get the feeling that a school's success in basketball will become almost irrelevant in the realignment discussion. A school with a poor win-loss history will be able to buy a 15 man or 15 woman team overnight.
Or with the cost of being a contender in football ever increasing, perhaps more schools will stop dreaming about a FB natty and put more emphasis on basketball (men's and women's). :)
 
Or with the cost of being a contender in football ever increasing, perhaps more schools will stop dreaming about a FB natty and put more emphasis on basketball (men's and women's). :)

Look at what Texas Tech is doing in Softball. They have essentially bought an all-star team in the last month that includes players from other schools that were just in the Women's CWS last month for other teams.

 
Look at what Texas Tech is doing in Softball. They have essentially bought an all-star team in the last month that includes players from other schools that were just in the Women's CWS last month for other teams.


Ha! Maybe they will actually win something then.

I mean it’s softball. It’s not the same market as hoop.
 
Look at what Texas Tech is doing in Softball. They have essentially bought an all-star team in the last month that includes players from other schools that were just in the Women's CWS last month for other teams.


What do think the cost of NIL is for Women’s softball? 10 or 20 Million? Yea, it’s a joke, but I really wonder what they spent.
 
Look at what Texas Tech is doing in Softball. They have essentially bought an all-star team in the last month that includes players from other schools that were just in the Women's CWS last month for other teams.

Yeah, seems like some schools are going to pick a couple of non-revenue sports to focus on while treading water in football and putting good focus on basketball.
 

Online statistics

Members online
110
Guests online
2,322
Total visitors
2,432

Forum statistics

Threads
164,170
Messages
4,385,560
Members
10,190
Latest member
epkerrigan


.
..
Top Bottom