Husky25
Dink & Dunk beat the Greatest Show on Turf.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
- Messages
- 18,960
- Reaction Score
- 20,169
I know we are in silly season here but I think basketball would be closer than football mostly owing to the line play. Reality is NFL lines are going to be bigger and stronger and more durable.
I figure with basketball you could get the right amount of team play and the NBA team wouldn't be nearly as into it and live up to their skill an ability. I mean the college team beat the "dream team" no?
Football I just see being 8 shades of ugly because of the trenches. Basketball has a shot because of the team aspect and the trust involved in operating on the floor. Both likely lose but thats how I'm seeing it.
Oh please!! First of all, they didn't play Duke (Impossible, given as Laettner was on The Dream Team) or UNLV as a single team. It was a collection of lottery picks.
Second, it is a thinly veiled fact that Chuck Daly threw the first game vs the College All-Stars in order to bond the team. Jordan barely played in the first scrimmage. What happened the next day? The Dream Team lit them up like they were Cuba in the Tournament of the Americas.
More from Scalabrine:
"They don't recognize what you and me do recognize," Scalabrine told Robinson. "When you're in the NBA, there's all kinds of tells, right? Like if a guy puts his hand like that, you know what he's gonna do. If a guy does a hesitation, you know what he's gonna do. All that stuff is like in real time in the NBA, you got to be so on top of the reads. It's not speed. You can't look at me and say my brain is slow. My brain is fast. My body might be slow, but I have to read whether a guy's gonna shoot, drive, go to the middle, pass. If you're not reading those things, you're not playing in the NBA."
Last edited: