Or maybe rights for out of conference women’s basketball gamesUConn should ask for the biggest share of the media deal.
Or maybe rights for out of conference women’s basketball gamesUConn should ask for the biggest share of the media deal.
Or maybe rights for out of conference women’s basketball games
And the BE will say no. Unfortunately, only way that happens is if we sign a GOR or something that keeps us legally bound to the BE. Considering the ACC is prime to be blown up in the next couple of years, it would be counter intuitive.UConn should ask for the biggest share of the media deal.
I would sign up for the Gonzaga deal in a heart beat.And the BE will say no. Unfortunately, only way that happens is if we sign a GOR or something that keeps us legally bound to the BE. Considering the ACC is prime to be blown up in the next couple of years, it would be counter intuitive.
I’d love this, too, and we should ask but we are not getting a better deal than we have. That is the problem with being in a conference that views itself as better than it is. The Fox deal will be lousy for us but fine for the likes of Seton Hall.I would sign up for the Gonzaga deal in a heart beat.
The first unit for just for making the tournament goes into the conference pot , every other unit earned you keep for yourself .
UConn would make almost three million a year for the next 5 under that plan. Which could go up depending on our performance in the near future.
That's the issue with The Big East. Despite the nostalgia of the return along with a handful of shorter trips, it will never be a natural fit for UConn. When you have 10 teams aligned in both their athletic and economic vision for what a conference should be, and 1 team essentially caught between two worlds there will always be tension.I’d love this, too, and we should ask but we are not getting a better deal than we have. That is the problem with being in a conference that views itself as better than it is. The Fox deal will be lousy for us but fine for the likes of Seton Hall.
I imagine one day, those in the B1G will think "you know, it would be nice to be able to win a title in basketball".I'm not sure that The B1G is in the cards, but I truly hope that The ACC or Big 12 is. There needs to be stability in both basketball/football scheduling and a revenue stream that allows the AD to maintain its high levels of success.
Was that supposed to be cute or clever .... NOTI would root for the University of Tehran Terrorists before I root for Wesleyan.
I think we are having success in the big eastThat's the issue with The Big East. Despite the nostalgia of the return along with a handful of shorter trips, it will never be a natural fit for UConn. When you have 10 teams aligned in both their athletic and economic vision for what a conference should be, and 1 team essentially caught between two worlds there will always be tension.
I'm not sure that The B1G is in the cards, but I truly hope that The ACC or Big 12 is. There needs to be stability in both basketball/football scheduling and a revenue stream that allows the AD to maintain its high levels of success.
I don't think so. 30 or so regular season BB games per team vs. 12 FB games. Except for the fans of a specific team, the casual fan isn't interested in that many BB games which translates to fewer advertising $$ which translates to lesser media contract $$ until March Madness.Maybe...the magnetic poles will once again shift...
Basketball ...could it start carrying more weight ?
The magnetic poles switched in the 90's. Basketball was more of the breadwinner than football and then..boom ! Football started taking off in media contracts.
Example...When FSU joined the ACC, FSU made about 40% more per year than the top SEC school. In 1995, FSU's ACC payout was $5.6 million. The top SEC school was just under $4 million. As late as 2001, FSU's payout from the ACC was $9.5 million, while the top SEC school (Kentucky) pulled in just over $7 million.
From the time FSU joined the ACC until the early 2000s, the ACC was the most "lucrative" conference in college athletics. And Swofford has said that the conference did not see the pole switch coming but tried to recover. A basketball conference in a football world. But, like an ocean liner, conference culture does not swiftly turn.
The question is...will basketball start to regain more of a monetary share ?
In basketball without a doubt. UConn Men's Basketball is the class of the NCAA. Personally, I think it has more to do with Hurley being a stud coach than The Big East being some kind of magic elixir, however you might not have Hurley if the program remained in the AAC.I think we are having success in the big east
Maybe FSU should have to pay back that sum, when they were making more than SEC schools. Seems only fair given their current arguments.Maybe...the magnetic poles will once again shift...
Basketball ...could it start carrying more weight ?
The magnetic poles switched in the 90's. Basketball was more of the breadwinner than football and then..boom ! Football started taking off in media contracts.
Example...When FSU joined the ACC, FSU made about 40% more per year than the top SEC school. In 1995, FSU's ACC payout was $5.6 million. The top SEC school was just under $4 million. As late as 2001, FSU's payout from the ACC was $9.5 million, while the top SEC school (Kentucky) pulled in just over $7 million.
From the time FSU joined the ACC until the early 2000s, the ACC was the most "lucrative" conference in college athletics. And Swofford has said that the conference did not see the pole switch coming but tried to recover. A basketball conference in a football world. But, like an ocean liner, conference culture does not swiftly turn.
The question is...will basketball start to regain more of a monetary share ?
Are you saying the ACC is starting to resemble the Old Big East ? We all know how that worked out .Huh?
I don't understand...if the argument is fair dealing, open and transparent (they have only asked the court to define what the contracts mean)...I don't see it.
If you mean general unhappiness with the ACC...I think DLandy said something re UConn that hit me as also true for FSU..
That's the issue with The Big East. Despite the nostalgia of the return along with a handful of shorter trips, it will never be a natural fit for UConn. When you have 10 teams aligned in both their athletic and economic vision for what a conference should be, and 1 team essentially caught between two worlds there will always be tension.
And FSU is caught between two worlds...their primary rival is an SEC team, they recruit from the same areas as the SEC..the campus is 30 miles from the Georgia border and 90 miles from Alabama.
FSU is a football school and basketball may not even be the second sport....
Never really a comfortable member of the Tobacco Road culture...
Are you saying the ACC is starting to resemble the Old Big East ? We all know how that worked out .
I think we are having success in the big east
Surprised nobody has mentioned this:
Sources: NCAA in talks to settle NIL antitrust case
The leaders of college sports are involved in "deep discussions" to reach a legal settlement that would likely lay out the framework for sharing revenue with athletes in a future NCAA business model, sources told ESPN.www.espn.com
View attachment 100261
Surprised nobody has mentioned this:
Sources: NCAA in talks to settle NIL antitrust case
The leaders of college sports are involved in "deep discussions" to reach a legal settlement that would likely lay out the framework for sharing revenue with athletes in a future NCAA business model, sources told ESPN.www.espn.com
View attachment 100261
What for?The damages payable by the big time programs could be massive.