CL82
NCAA Woman's Basketball National Champions
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 62,109
- Reaction Score
- 238,293
The only thing that could make this more of a loser would be if Aresco was pitching it.
The Syracuse chancellor IS one of the leaders of this groupView attachment 98867Lol, it's like the unpopular kids deciding to host a party so that they will get to go and then being shocked on none of the popular kids have an interest.
The only thing that could make this more of a loser would be if Aresco was pitching it.
you really don't get it, do you? They can already cut you out. They do not care about you and never did.I think we can squeeze in with a few others if it comes to that. Sure would be a good time to win dual natties again. We’ve got to stay way above the other non P5 schools in stature.
reality is this is a first pass... they won't finish at 80. they'll shed other schools as they go along and maximize the markets.Sadly, it has nothing to do with basketball. Only football matters. The thing I don't understand with the new realignment is how the SEC and B1G members reassigned to a new conference feel about getting less money. Also what is the effect on TV networks that fund the conferences. The B1G and SEC will not be happy sharing.
Exactly.The Syracuse chancellor IS one of the leaders of this group
Supposedly the revenue would not be equal but either way I don't see the big schools agreeing to this.I love how no one wants to address the revenue aspect of this. Like you really think the P2 are gonna be like “yeah let’s all negotiate one big contract with ~45 other lesser programs”?
yeah that makes sense, they want to create a world where they can't be removed. i saw on reddit the notion 'well we need to do this so we don't go bankrupt' and I'm like "uh huh... sure..."The bottom end P4 schools are spearheading this. The tell: they can't be relegated, and they are officially on the same level as the Alabamas of the world. It's not happening.
The Syracuse chancellor IS one of the leaders of this group
Nails it ...
Nails it ...
I think this is ultimately the last play UConn will make. Just have to wait to see how the ACC lawsuits play out.He basically laid out why UConn has to do whatever it can to get into a P4 conference. Take a partial share or no share like SMU for a while, etc. Beg them to let you in, make offers they can't refuse, etc.
It's not about chasing football riches. It's about protecting basketball. The Big East has a shaky future.
The ACC has regrets about not adding UConn?![]()
Friedlander: The ACC messed up by not adding UConn earlier. Don't blow it again
The ACC has hurt itself by passing UConn over in its 3 previous rounds of realignment. It can't afford to keep making the same mistake.www.saturdaydownsouth.com
The ACC has regrets about not adding UConn?
Prove it.
This article shows two things![]()
Friedlander: The ACC messed up by not adding UConn earlier. Don't blow it again
The ACC has hurt itself by passing UConn over in its 3 previous rounds of realignment. It can't afford to keep making the same mistake.www.saturdaydownsouth.com
This article shows two things
1. Most of the realignment has been all about the right place at the right time. Louisville, BC, Cuse and Pitt peaked at the absolute right times while UConn hit one of its biggest obstacles at the wrong time.
2. The author is clearly basketball-focused and fails to understand that football drives the bus. How people don't get that by now is beyond me. Southern footballs schools drive the ACC bus until they decide to run it off the cliff.
We might get an ACC invite once it has been picked by the vultures. Unless football is still valued greater then look for Memphis, Tulane and USF to take priority. Academics do not matter ... only football.. see Ville.
But not so tremendously as to offer the six-time and back to back national champions a slot.The ACC pretending basketball doesn’t matter isn’t a great idea when the B12, the only conference they are really competing with, values it tremendously.