Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 682 | The Boneyard
.

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.



Dave Chappelle GIF
 
Not so much as hurting it but they failed to help it. They had the chance to dominate hoops. And football - yeah Utah is real good now but how long will they be able to sustain that without access to Cal talent? Neon at CO will flop or bolt.
I don’t know if goku is real or not but if he reflects anything of KU’s fan base they are not happ

I’m assuming it was Michael Crow from ASU. BC is lucky that he is not an ACC president.
 
And if FSU takes huge money from private equity, that is likely to happen.
…..and that’s OK. If a PE shop creates an SPV to house their investment, you’d expect the SPV to be taxed at some level.
 
Despite championships within MBB and WBB within the purgatory years of the AAC, interest waned with no natural rivals to compete against. The games that mattered were those scheduled out of conference vs former Big East teams. KO did mismanage the program, but there was no juice there and interest waned because of the makeup of the opponents. Regional appeal matters, at least at the gate, and is more humane for the experience of who we still pretend to be “student athletes”.

The money is there now from standard media distribution, but it will not be the case in 10 years when streaming is the dominant form or some whacko ESPN brain implant comes to fruition. It’s not wrong to pursue entry into a P? Conference, but we must recognize it isn’t salvation over even a 20 year timeframe either. Change will be the only constant, history and tradition be damned.

As an aside it would be interesting to trace application numbers to UConn following championship years. Is winning a better bump to the bottom line and prestige of a university that helps academics, or is the conference a better engine to attract better students and research funding, or is it all mutually exclusive. There’s a PHD thesis out there for someone interested at investigating these dynamics and ultimately what success or membership brings to an higher education institution.
There’s no doubt that having a successful athletic department creates benefits for the university as a whole. I applied to Duke as their basketball program was gaining prominence and was unceremoniously rejected despite my stellar credentials.:)
 

Dang that's brutal. This conference realignment stuff is really getting out of hand. I wonder how many ppl will just get sick of it and say screw college sports or, eventually get bored of it. Not everyone in these inflated conferences can win. What happens when Texas or usc have .500 seasons? Or worse. At this point I hope the descion makers completely fumble this whole scheme.
 
it’s funny that the B10 took the “valuable” Pac schools, and the rest couldn’t get a good offer. But now they’re all gonna get paid more in the B12 for some reason? Conference Realignment really isn’t based on anything.

It's not so much about individual teams as it is the matchups of games played and the combined following of the two teams who are playing who will generate the ratings of the game. It's hard to generate higher ratings when you have a lesser following and playing a team who has a lesser following and those teams are both in the Pacific Time Zone playing when half of America is asleep.
 
Does anyone think the Big XII is going to expand with 2 more teams? Or is that a pipe dream?
 
More on the Rutgers move. Some of these additions are going to look terrible pretty soon.



“We basically had a 400 percent increase (in network revenue),” Delany says of the Maryland/Rutgers impact. “We went from about $50 million a year to about $200 million a year annual average value. That makes everybody’s eyes pop.”

Doesn't sound like it was a terrible decision to me.

Rutgers had the steepest hill to climb of anyone. They have made - and continue to make - improvements and investments into their facilities. Will it work? Who knows. Doesn't really matter. Not every addition can be a grand slam. Some of these schools have to pile up the losses because not everyone can go 12-0. Every conference needs bottom feeders to feed the middle-tier and top-tier teams.
 
“We basically had a 400 percent increase (in network revenue),” Delany says of the Maryland/Rutgers impact. “We went from about $50 million a year to about $200 million a year annual average value. That makes everybody’s eyes pop.”

Doesn't sound like it was a terrible decision to me.

Rutgers had the steepest hill to climb of anyone. They have made - and continue to make - improvements and investments into their facilities. Will it work? Who knows. Doesn't really matter. Not every addition can be a grand slam. Some of these schools have to pile up the losses because not everyone can go 12-0. Every conference needs bottom feeders to feed the middle-tier and top-tier teams.
Send this to the guy who wrote the article. We don't care.
 

Cal and Stanford need to swallow their pride and call up Yormark now. joining the beefed up big12 is preferable to going indy in football and parking all their olympic sports in the WCC. cmon now.
 
Cal and Stanford need to swallow their pride and call up Yormark now. joining this beefed up big12 is preferable to going indy and football and parking all their olympic sports in the WCC. cmon now.
PAC schools look stupid badmouthing Big12 academics only to come crawling back with hat in hand.
 
Cal and Stanford need to swallow their pride and call up Yormark now. joining the beefed up big12 is preferable to going indy in football and parking all their olympic sports in the WCC. cmon now.
Preferable to whom? You don't think Cal and Stanford are capable of determining which of the horrific choices left to them are in the best interests of their institution?
 
Preferable to whom? You don't think Cal and Stanford are capable of determining which of the horrific choices left to them are in the best interests of their institution?
yeah ledecky and kerri walsh wouldve signed up to swim and play volleyball in the west coast conference. k.
 
yeah ledecky and kerri walsh wouldve signed up to swim and play volleyball in the west coast conference. k.
And you know they would have in Big XII?

Stanford will figure it out. I don't rule out for a second they might not end up considering the Big XII. They might also pursue a Big Ten slot even if they don't get to share in the TV money.
 
And you know they would have in Big XII?

Stanford will figure it out. I don't rule out for a second they might not end up considering the Big XII. They might also pursue a Big Ten slot even if they don't get to share in the TV money.
That is the most likely outcome. They will take a lesser payment and join the B1G.
 
So would the likes of UNC and Virginia move their sports to a P2 only to lose their fan base. Not to mention in spite of revenue, how many do not make a profit? Also, what’s more important to the fan base? Winning or AD profitability?
I'm not so sure that changing conferences necessarily destroys a fanbase. I am confident, however, that the inability to compete at the highest levels of the sport does destroy a fanbase.

People always mention money, but throwing more money at others who have more money than you becomes futile and won’t produce wins.
I'm struggling to understand that verbiage, but profit maximization is for the vast majority of organizations the reason why they exist. So the pursuit of more profits is never futile, and is often critical to continued existence. I think that's the case in athletics right now. The Pac 12 got a deal that was worth, minimally five times what we make in the big east. It wasn't sufficient to hold that organization together given the fact that the next closest competitor is making nearly 8 times what we make in the Big East.
 

Online statistics

Members online
354
Guests online
3,521
Total visitors
3,875

Forum statistics

Threads
164,932
Messages
4,415,389
Members
10,240
Latest member
The Deuce


.
..
Top Bottom