Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 539 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,080
Reaction Score
209,492
Kansas is better. Sorry.

1690736291731.jpeg

Agree to disagree.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,066
Reaction Score
82,528
Is there anything to the smoke around Oregon/Washington
My guess is that if Washington and Oregon can keep UA in the fold, they aren’t going anywhere. If Arizona is going, it makes the PAC less viable in the near term and that could force a move.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,071
Reaction Score
7,939
Show your math. 5>4 isn’t convincing unless you think UCLA is the greatest program of all time. I certainly don’t. They had one great stretch.

I don’t think there’s any clear answers here. KU is 6th in titles, but first in all time wins. Unmatched consistency over time. Last time KU missed the tournament was 1989. Kentucky is 2nd in wins and titles, and probably Deserves bragging rights if anyone does. North Carolina is 3rd in wins and titles. Duke, UConn and IU with 5 but Duke dominates on wins at 4th. UConn is a distant 25th and IU 10th. But then you can factor in recency and how much happened since the expansion of the tournament, that helps UConn, hurts IU and UCLA.

For me the top 5 are UK, KU, UNC, Duke and UCLA. UConn probably sits at #6. Keep winning and that can change.
U may be correct if considering all-time. Now make the numbers for the last quarter century which is what really counts
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,080
Reaction Score
209,492
Counting women we do leap to #1 for sure.
Or without them unless we are going to start counting imaginary Helms trophies.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,066
Reaction Score
82,528
Or without them unless we are going to start counting imaginary Helms trophies.
We’d still be ahead of Kentucky and UNC? Um…no. That’s just delusional. I don’t want us to become a hated fan base. I’m fine if Cooley calls us arrogant, because vs PC that’s deserved. We are in the mix of elite programs and that is all that matters.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,080
Reaction Score
209,492
We’d still be ahead of Kentucky and UNC? Um…no. That’s just delusional. I don’t want us to become a hated fan base. I’m fine if Cooley calls us arrogant, because vs PC that’s deserved. We are in the mix of elite programs and that is all that matters.
LOL, imaginary trophies dreamed up long after the season has passed are delusional. We laughed at them when our Canadian friends wanted to tell theirs, that's not changing when someone treats them out in favor of Kansas. The difference is Kansas actually has real success so trying to pad it with imaginary trophies just seems silly.

5>4. Internalize this thought my friend, because of all things go well this next week, you may be seeing it a lot.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,066
Reaction Score
82,528
LOL, imaginary trophies dreamed up long after the season has passed are delusional.

5>4 my friend.
What? Kentucky has 8 NCAA titles. Not Helms.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,080
Reaction Score
209,492
What? Kentucky has 8 NCAA titles. Not Helms.
Not in men's basketball. That would be 1952, 1988, 2008*, 2022*

Now if you are talking overall then the formula becomes 24>12.

*Bill Self thus questionable
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2012
Messages
1,111
Reaction Score
4,472
Actually I've been right on everything.

Absolutely not

You stated unequivocally numerous times Colorado comes, we get the invite immediately as number 14 this past week. No qualifications about any other PAC interest, which was an obvious possibility

Now you've moved the goal posts to include conversations with the other PAC teams have held it up

The truth is you are just reading the same things we are.

As for this take, you are 2 championships behind in the modern era, not even close.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,809
Reaction Score
9,036
Actually I've been right on everything.
We really appreciate your presence. We just want you to be right about the B12 expansion regarding UCONN.

Once we are in the B12, I have no doubt UCONN/Kansas will be a great rivalry for both fanbases. With some national coverage and hype, I am confident it can reach the level of Duke/UNC in time. If nothing else, the NCAA men's basketball title chase (5>4) between our programs would be awesome since we are so close to each other right now.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
57,080
Reaction Score
209,492
Absolutely not

You stated unequivocally numerous times Colorado comes, we get the invite immediately as number 14 this past week. No qualifications about any other PAC interest, which was an obvious possibility

Now you've moved the goal posts to include conversations with the other PAC teams have held it up

The truth is you are just reading the same things we are.

As for this take, you are 2 championships behind in the modern era, not even close.
Relax.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,066
Reaction Score
82,528
Not in men's basketball. That would be 1952, 1988, 2008*, 2022*

Now if you are talking overall then the formula becomes 24>12.

*Bill Self thus questionable
You’re still talking Kansas when I’m talking Kentucky.
 
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
675
Reaction Score
3,684
Really? I don't know if I want to live in a world where you can't take everything you read on the Internet as being 100% true.
Thank God we don’t have to. Everything you read on the internet is 100% true.
 

Online statistics

Members online
41
Guests online
1,807
Total visitors
1,848

Forum statistics

Threads
157,163
Messages
4,085,878
Members
9,982
Latest member
CJasmer


Top Bottom