What public flirtation?I wonder a bit if the Big 12 sudden public flirtation with us is their way of saying that there will consequences if you vote against our CCG plan. Those consequences being the loss of a desirable piece (Connecticut) and competition on the East coast. An attempt to change the cost/benefit analysis a bit to the favor there proposal makes sense but it may be a too Storrs-centric view.
No g r e g. s w a I m. Is nonkey. He is full of sh.t.Is this a key tweet? If not I'll post in the other thread.
Matt Schonvisky @MattSchonvisky 3h3 hours ago
Full @GS interview discussing potential Big 12 expansion, looming CCG vote on 1/15 & how #UConn fits #BleedBlue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVJDX2zbTIs&feature=youtu.be…
http://ow.ly/WRZHu
slmandel 1:36pm via Twitter for iPhone
Bob Bowlsby: "We do not want to add members or be forced to play two divisions." NCAA proposal vote next week
http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...-sec-greg-sankey-ncaa-rule-change-vote-011016
That looks like a man who is making a ingenious PR move...he can then go back to his conference if motion is voted down and say..I tried everything possible to get it to pass...now we need to move forward. If for some reason he gets a compromise he has succeeded in what they wanted to do.Reached by phone Sunday morning, Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said: “We continue to support full deregulation and believe conferences should have full prerogative on how they conduct competition. Having stated our first preference, I believe we can find a compromise that will work.”
Asked if that compromise could include two divisions, Bowlsby said: “We do not want to add members or be forced to play two divisions. Any compromise would have to consider those two provisions.”
Typical Big 12 media people suddenly speaking favorably aobut UConn, KState univ pres tweet about talking with Herbst, etc.What public flirtation?
Typical. Big 12 media people suddenly speaking favorably aobut UConn, KState univ pres tweet about talking with Herbst, etc.
What do mean by typical? I'm not drinking the phantom koolaid? I hope for something a little more solid than what we've seen so far.Typical. Big 12 media people suddenly speaking favorably aobut UConn, KState univ pres tweet about talking with Herbst, etc.
Ignore the period, it's a typo. I meant the normal/standard Big 12 media people.What do mean by typical? I'm not drinking the phantom koolaid? I hope for something a little more solid than what we've seen so far.
Jon Solomon @JonSolomonCBS 3h3 hours ago
Will NCAA vote this week force Big 12 to expand for conference championship game? http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...ce-big-12-to-expand-for-conference-title-game …
“There is a standard that’s been set, and there are four conferences among the five that meet that standard,” he said. “But there’s an openness to see if there’s an approach that works for the Big 12 in its current circumstance.”
Bowlsby said the Big 12 could go to two, five-team divisions as the Big Ten proposal would require. But the Big 12 wants to avoid that because its two best teams could be on one side of the division.
“What would have been the best matchup was already played within divisional play,” Bowlsby said of such a scenario. “I'm not convinced that a full round robin isn't the most viable and most reliable way to determine your champion.
Jon Solomon @JonSolomonCBS 3h3 hours ago
Will NCAA vote this week force Big 12 to expand for conference championship game? http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...ce-big-12-to-expand-for-conference-title-game …
....
“What would have been the best matchup was already played within divisional play,” Bowlsby said of such a scenario. “I'm not convinced that a full round robin isn't the most viable and most reliable way to determine your champion.
So basically, 4 of the P5 conferences had made the investment and gone through the pain of being able to have a conference championship game involving 12+ teams divided into 2 divisions. Yet, Bowlsby and the XII instead of seeking a compromise 1) don't want to expand and 2) want to have Texas and Oklahoma in the same division basically trying to assure itself that Oklahoma and Texas will be the championship game each year. hate to break it to him; but, the Long Horns have not been the XII's best team in some time. I can't see how this is going to end well for the XII.
In that story:
B12 staying at 10 is, on balance, good for UConn IMHO. Avoids the risk of being left out again while potentially Cincy gets in the P5, triggering a look-in to the ESPN contract (less money).
From what is coming out on twitter from some of the B-12 beat writers looks like there may have been a compromise reached before the vote.I thought that it had be determined by the other conferences if they could have a 10 team conference championship?
No, all along the NCAA made you have 12 for a championship game and now they're changing it for the Big 12 because of Conference Realignment Rule #1.So all along the NCAA made you have 12 for a championship game and now they're changing it for the Big 12 because they don't want to force the Big 12 to expand? Even though other conferences had to expand to get a CCG - namely the ACC right?
So all along the NCAA made you have 12 for a championship game and now they're changing it for the Big 12 because they don't want to force the Big 12 to expand? Even though other conferences had to expand to get a CCG - namely the ACC right?
I'm more worried about Rule 1's impact if the B12 expands than if it doesn't.No, all along the NCAA made you have 12 for a championship game and now they're changing it for the Big 12 because of Conference Realignment Rule #1.
I dont know what the original Big 12 proposal was... did it include some sort of round robin scheduling to avoid the ccg and the minimum required teams per division?How is that a compromise? That is the Big 12's original proposal.