CL82
NCAA Woman's Basketball National Champions
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 61,798
- Reaction Score
- 236,462
So... us?We don’t need all of the Big East. Just the good programs.
So... us?We don’t need all of the Big East. Just the good programs.
If the ACC wants to cherry pick, I don't think they would grab Creighton over GTown. Historic rivalries, nation's capital, highly competitive academics, etc.Not really. If the ACC invites UConn, Marquette, Creighton, Villanova and St. John’s they aren’t saying no LOL.
Basketball-onlys would never do it despite it making sense.It would work and it would be good for everyone involved, which is why it probably won't happen. Regular basketball games between old Big East rivals (UConn, Nova, GTown, Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville) would all be top notch draws, in addition to the obvious big matchups between the top Big East teams and UNC / Duke.
The football addition of UConn will obviously help us monetarily, but will also help teams like BC who's fan base is (not surprisingly) much smaller than the ACC predicted...
We're quickly approaching an era in college sports where they may not have a choice...Basketball-onlys would never do it despite it making sense.
If the ACC wants to cherry pick, I don't think they would grab Creighton over GTown. Historic rivalries, nation's capital, highly competitive academics, etc.
But if they cherry pick, then it's not a merger. So long as it includes us, I wouldn't care about the rest...
Not really. If the ACC invites UConn, Marquette, Creighton, Villanova and St. John’s they aren’t saying no LOL.
K specifically mentions UConn. "We could let, not let, but Connecticut would have the opportunity to play football in our league."
The Big East has leverage here. K knows that the ACC is struggling while UConn is red hot. The Big East has MSG. No question cuse, bcu, pitt, louisville would benefit. Duke wants to be in NYC. A merger would really lock out all the other P conferences from northeast and east coast basketball. I think they'd have to lock in UNC somehow because otherwise, the ACC side isn't bringing much else to the table.
Why? They need to have the Nebraska market locked up?? Or they just need to have our 6th best team??Maybe they would just take Georgetown. They would be absolute morons passing on Creighton.
There is no reason not to invite the whole league, since the league would definitely go to an unequal revenue share if this happened. Maybe require an NIL minimum to remain members.
The ACC needs markets to drive subscriptions. And by overlaying the heavily populated northeastern markets where the ACC's weakest programs are, it makes those markets an order of magnitude more valuable to the ACC then they ever would be alone.
These kind of mergers are low hanging fruit in I-Banking. The #4 and #5 player in a market merge to compete with 1 and 2, and put 3 into a corner. That is what most M&A is. A second-year associate at Morgan Stanley or Goldman Sachs could create a good merger deck on this idea in two days. The ACC would rather sue itself and argue over league documents that people may or may not have.
Why? They need to have the Nebraska market locked up?? Or they just need to have our 6th best team??
Either it's a full merger, or they are going to cherry pick the teams that don't require a large amount of feeding. You would REALLY need to show me that Creighton fits the latter...
If you think Creighton is the addition that the ACC can't skip out on or they would be "absolute morons", then we can't talk about conference realignment together anymore...Seriously? They are regulars in the Top 25 and better than most of the ACC.
Georgetown may never be good or great again.
Creighton averaged 17k fans last year, 6th nationally. I think this basketball-only merger stuff is a fantasy, but Creighton holds their own and then some. BE is lucky to have them and vice versa.Why? They need to have the Nebraska market locked up?? Or they just need to have our 6th best team??
Either it's a full merger, or they are going to cherry pick the teams that don't require a large amount of feeding. You would REALLY need to show me that Creighton fits the latter...
Settle down, fella. I never said I was unhappy that they were in the Big East. You'd have to explain how it makes sense for the ACC to pay them $17 million per year (the amount the ACC pays ND for Olympic sports). If you can't, then you'll finally understand the problem...Creighton averaged 17k fans last year, 6th nationally. I think this basketball-only merger stuff is a fantasy, but Creighton holds their own and then some. BE is lucky to have them and vice versa.
Do you think ND gets $17M for its Olympic sports, or is there some additional amount thrown in for scheduling and other things.Settle down, fella. I never said I was unhappy that they were in the Big East. You'd have to explain how it makes sense for the ACC to pay them $17 million per year (the amount the ACC pays ND for Olympic sports). If you can't, then you'll finally understand the problem...
If the offer wasn't at least noticeably better than the current 7 million per year from the Big East, then it wouldn't happen on our end anyways. So even if we call it 13 million per team, and staying with the fantasy of cherry-picking non-football teams, I don't think Creighton is in the top 4 or 5 of their Big East wish list...Do you think ND gets $17M for its Olympic sports, or is there some additional amount thrown in for scheduling and other things.
If you breakdown ACC payouts, the Non football isn’t $17M for everybody. That is too high.
I’d think ACC nonfb is close to what BE gets.
If you think Creighton is the addition that the ACC can't skip out on or they would be "absolute morons", then we can't talk about conference realignment together anymore...
Settle down, fella. I never said I was unhappy that they were in the Big East. You'd have to explain how it makes sense for the ACC to pay them $17 million per year (the amount the ACC pays ND for Olympic sports). If you can't, then you'll finally understand the problem...
Although I think there would be a "prisoners dilemma" element here.If the offer wasn't at least noticeably better than the current 7 million per year from the Big East, then it wouldn't happen on our end anyways.
If the offer wasn't at least noticeably better than the current 7 million per year from the Big East, then it wouldn't happen on our end anyways. So even if we call it 13 million per team, and staying with the fantasy of cherry-picking non-football teams, I don't think Creighton is in the top 4 or 5 of their Big East wish list...
I don't even understand how a merger of conferences happens. The schools just vote behind Vals back?Nope. Even in an unequal setup there are plenty of reasons.
Sone of them are utterly dead weight. And scheduling and so on.