Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 875 | The Boneyard
.-.

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

.-.
ESPN reporting on realignment would be like if the Wall Street Journal owned the New York Stock Exchange and reported on it

Tbf the journalists who work for ESPN and the executives who directly profit from conference realignment are not the same people and probably do not share the same values
 
Tbf the journalists who work for ESPN and the executives who directly profit from conference realignment are not the same people and probably do not share the same values
The same could be said for Wall Street Journal reporters and News Corp executives.
 
But the journalists want to keep their jobs so.....I don't expect any honest reporting from them. Unless they are saying this is primarily espn's fault.
Journalists at espn on talent contracts. Corp has no control over them.

They don’t kiss up to c suite, at all. Journalists are so different than normal employees. They are the product. They could care less what management thinks .
 
Journalists at espn on talent contracts. Corp has no control over them.

They don’t kiss up to c suite, at all. Journalists are so different than normal employees. They are the product. They could care less what management thinks .
So who decides what is actually published under the espn brand? Not the journalists.
 
.-.


Assisted <<<

-> … And so these latest rumors went racing down social media channels to the delight or frustration or general curiosity of a fan base. Discussions on Tuesday and Wednesday with numerous people in and around the UConn athletic operation yielded nothing substantially new on the topic, reaction ranging from “haven’t heard a thing” to “it’s all a continuation” and “nothing has changed.”

A lot more with-in the article ^^
 
So who decides what is actually published under the espn brand? Not the journalists.
Umm. The journalists do. C suite has almost no role in day to day operations. They can come in last second to kill a story, but that comes at a great cost to the leaders credibility.

The day to day, the SVPs stay away.
 
Journalists at espn on talent contracts. Corp has no control over them.

They don’t kiss up to c suite, at all. Journalists are so different than normal employees. They are the product. They could care less what management thinks .
I've never heard that point of view from any journalist. They care, some more than others; oftentimes depending on their circumstance.
 
Umm. The journalists do. C suite has almost no role in day to day operations. They can come in last second to kill a story, but that comes at a great cost to the leaders credibility.

The day to day, the SVPs stay away.
Sr Editors/Executive Editors decide what is assigned to writers and what is ultimately published. Corporate leadership exerts "guidance" to the Sr Editors/Executive Editors. To say journalists decide what is written is just not accurate.
 
I've never heard that point of view from any journalist. They care, some more than others; oftentimes depending on their circumstance.
Did Schefter care when he posted pics of Pierre-Paul’s x-Ray?
 
.-.


Assisted <<<

-> … And so these latest rumors went racing down social media channels to the delight or frustration or general curiosity of a fan base. Discussions on Tuesday and Wednesday with numerous people in and around the UConn athletic operation yielded nothing substantially new on the topic, reaction ranging from “haven’t heard a thing” to “it’s all a continuation” and “nothing has changed.”

A lot more with-in the article ^^


Why do we still find Jennifer Aniston attractive? Give me a break horde.
 
Sr Editors/Executive Editors decide what is assigned to writers and what is ultimately published. Corporate leadership exerts "guidance" to the Sr Editors/Executive Editors. To say journalists decide what is written is just not accurate.
That’s not what happens at all.

That seems like a very corporate structure. Journalists brings stories to the editors. Editors help frame, refine it, then push to get it elevated in the publication.

Just go to a budget meeting at any local newspaper. Editor in conjunction with writer decide what to write and how to write it .

Like, my editor at the old JI would say - go cover the game.

When a player got arrested, it was John, we having a story on that? Not, go do a story.
 
Ok, you have seen what you have seen and I have seen what I have seen (a handful of big news media companies).
Maybe sports is different. But Woj don’t give a xrao about what Jimmy Pitaro thinks. Pitaro got no role in day to day.

And I have worked at the biggest one and gone to those meetings before. It’s more of “Thamel, what you working on?”

hell, some writers are downright hostile to the editors and management.
 
That’s not what happens at all.

That seems like a very corporate structure. Journalists brings stories to the editors. Editors help frame, refine it, then push to get it elevated in the publication.

Just go to a budget meeting at any local newspaper. Editor in conjunction with writer decide what to write and how to write it .

Like, my editor at the old JI would say - go cover the game.

When a player got arrested, it was John, we having a story on that? Not, go do a story.
espn is in the entertainment business, not the news business. I am pretty sure all stories are spun to espn's liking. Or the authors get canned.
 
.-.

Online statistics

Members online
186
Guests online
13,550
Total visitors
13,736

Forum statistics

Threads
165,889
Messages
4,458,883
Members
10,330
Latest member
LYDKID


Top Bottom