- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 27,807
- Reaction Score
- 38,594
Could fill the map nicely for the ACC remnants. Just keep what they have started going.
ACC remnants plus plus JMU and Delaware would be interesting.
Could fill the map nicely for the ACC remnants. Just keep what they have started going.
Even Jay Bilas believes BB can break away ala CFP. UConn can be a major player in such a move. It remains farcical that UConn bumps along financially while the likes of Syracuse, BFC get $30mm per year. ( Rutgers getting $65mm is beyond farcical!).Well, I am no fan of the NCAA. And don’t you realize this arrangement kills the power basketball schools? and there is no single greater victim in this arrangement than UConn. If the basketball schools kept more the of the tv revenue, they would be much more lucrative and thereby more attractive. If the bball schools kept +/- 90% of the NCAA tournament revenue , UConn would be in a power league tomorrow.
The last number I saw was 6.5MM in the student fee subsidy. It had been as high as 8.8MM a few years ago IIRC.where does uconn fall on this list?
In case you were wondering why the thought exists that we don’t take football seriously:
In case you were wondering why the thought exists that we don’t take football seriously:
I met him at a couple of tailgates. It probably was a health issue.Wow good remember. That was him. Whatever happened to him? Hopefully not a health issue.
Ain't that America?Then you believe in folklore.
For you and me?Ain't that America?
In case you were wondering why the thought exists that we don’t take football seriously:
You know as well as I do that the bar always shifts when it comes to us:This graph doesn't really make that argument.
But who is "them?"You know as well as I do that the bar always shifts when it comes to us:
Them: “UConn spends more on men’s basketball than it does on football”
Us: “Yeah but we spend more on football than anyone else in the G5”
Them: “Yeah but you do that through a subsidy generated by massive student fees because your athletic department has so much debt”
And on, and on, and on
Anyone in college sports media and administration, including Athletic Directors as recently as last year from the Big 12But who is "them?"
Randos on Twitter that read at a third grade level?
No.. Taylor SwiftAin't that America?
Guess we need to shift the narratives one by one :You know as well as I do that the bar always shifts when it comes to us:
Them: “UConn spends more on men’s basketball than it does on football”
Us: “Yeah but we spend more on football than anyone else in the G5”
Them: “Yeah but you do that through a subsidy generated by massive student fees because your athletic department has so much debt”
And on, and on, and on
It’s percentages and perception. Sure UConn spends the same absolute dollars on football as the G5 schools. However if those same G5 schools had access to what UConn spends on basketball as well they’d allocate some (in certain cases most) of that to football as well.Idk, I feel like spending as much as the top G5 programs shows otherwise
UConn is also the only school among the major basketball programs where basketball draws more revenue than football. For each of the others football draws significantly more revenue. The non-UConn fan/president/AD wonders why UConn puts in so much “effort” (funding) to find dimes at the expense of finding dollars.
It’s not necessarily a fair argument but it’s an easy one to make, especially if you’re already predisposed to reject UConn.
The big money in basketball is the tournament and the NCAA uses it for a variety of things not basketball related .Even Jay Bilas believes BB can break away ala CFP. UConn can be a major player in such a move. It remains farcical that UConn bumps along financially while the likes of Syracuse, BFC get $30mm per year. ( Rutgers getting $65mm is beyond farcical!).
With the ACC blowing up, we'll find some allies to take over March Madness - like UNC, Duke. It's not crazy and if football did it, BB can too!
They wouldn't care how much money we spent if we didn't suck. We spend enough to be competitive. Can't change our region to a recruiting hotbedAnyone in college sports media and administration, including Athletic Directors as recently as last year from the Big 12
“We spend enough to be competitive” is relative and I would pretty easily argue that 2 bowl games in 12 years says that we do not spend enough to be competitive with our existing schedules.They wouldn't care how much money we spent if we didn't suck. We spend enough to be competitive. Can't change our region to a recruiting hotbed
But we spend as much as teams that are competitive“We spend enough to be competitive” is relative and I would pretty easily argue that 2 bowl games in 12 years says that we do not spend enough to be competitive with our existing schedules.