- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 608
- Reaction Score
- 2,677
If believe they have 15 members.Stanford and Cal make some sense. SMU doesn't make sense unless they need a partner for UConn. Why would they add 3 schools?
If believe they have 15 members.Stanford and Cal make some sense. SMU doesn't make sense unless they need a partner for UConn. Why would they add 3 schools?
Huh? If ESPN wanted brands and rivalries, it certainly would not be going after Cal, Stanford, and SMU lol. They would take UConn and put them up against old conference foes Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville, BC, VT, Miami…not to mention our significant tournament history with DukeIt doesn't matter all that much what the ACC wants - it's about what ESPN wants and ESPN wants brands/rivalries (whereas Fox wants markets).
14 for football. 17 football members is an odd number.If believe they have 15 members.
I think it is a mirage. No one has any real info on the dynamics if any. Sounds like something ESPN could dream up. Syracuse is, at best, a second tier, expensive ($80k+/year) private school. More importantly, how have they advanced the fortunes of the ACC? How many ACC titles have they won? They have won only one BB Natty two decades ago - pre- ACC. Also, they have won only one football Natty and that was during the Eisenhower administration. No baseball either! Boy, the BS is deep!Syracuse U is private and despite its location, is probably more connected to NYC than it is to the town of Syracuse. I'll bet a majority of its grads work in or around NYC. That could be changing though as tuitions are climbing and the the SUNY system is excellent.
Except, football rules the day and we aren't that desirable in football yet.Huh? If ESPN wanted brands and rivalries, it certainly would not be going after Cal, Stanford, and SMU lol. They would take UConn and put them up against old conference foes Syracuse, Pitt, Louisville, BC, VT, Miami…not to mention our significant tournament history with Duke
I thought I just read any expansion requires approval of 12 of the 15 ACC members.
Even if we offered to take no revenue for 5 years, I can’t imagine BC, Cuse, FSU, and Clemson voting us in.
There just is no route to get into the ACC for us.
Hope that the Big 12 decides to take UConn and say San Diego State if they do actually follow thru and add two more members - which is no guarantee.
Storrs is closer to NYC than Syracuse.Supposedly it delivers the NYC market. Not sure how that works considering Syracuse is closer to Canada than NYC.
Oh I know and I believe there are TV markets between Syracuse's and NYC's. UConn has a campus practically in the shadow of the Manhattan skyline, but yeah, they want us to believe Syracuse which is like 5 hours away from the city has a big impact there.Storrs is closer to NYC than Syracuse.
Everything you say about SU is true. All I'm saying is SU is a private university which has a strong connection to NYC and that connection is why it is in the ACC. Lots of wealthy kids go to SU because who else is paying that ridiculous tuition and then they go to the Big Apple when they graduate. (FBS programs in state). New York (3) is a state with 20 million people, 4th most populous state behind Cali (7), Texas (13) and Florida (7). Yet NY has only 3 FBS football programs, none of which are winning championships: Army, Buffalo, Syracuse. That's why SU is valuable to the ACC.I think it is a mirage. No one has any real info on the dynamics if any. Sounds like something ESPN could dream up. Syracuse is, at best, a second tier, expensive ($80k+/year) private school. More importantly, how have they advanced the fortunes of the ACC? How many ACC titles have they won? They have won only one BB Natty two decades ago - pre- ACC. Also, they have won only one football Natty and that was during the Eisenhower administration. No baseball either! Boy, the BS is deep!
Wouldn't Cal and Stanford just be better off joining the Big 12 and actually be in a P4 conference? Rationalize it by saying 6/12 of the PAC merged with Big 12, 4/12 of the PAC merged with the B1G, and 2/12 were sacrificed.If Cal and Stanford can't get in the ACC, I believe they will go independent as that is the only available way they can still be seen as a P4 school or equivalent.
As long as they reach an agreement with the other two and the MW, Stanford and Cal could keep the Pac X branding and rebuild an Olympic sports conference in their image.
See the following:
Cal
Stanford
Hawaii
UC Santa Barbara
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC Riverside
UC San Diego
Cal and Stanford could keep the precious P4 designation in football and have a strong Olympic sports conference.
What are you talking about? Wazzu and Ore st are not going to gift the PAC name to Stan Cal. If S/C want out, then the northern schools will backfill with the MW.If Cal and Stanford can't get in the ACC, I believe they will go independent as that is the only available way they can still be seen as a P4 school or equivalent.
As long as they reach an agreement with the other two and the MW, Stanford and Cal could keep the Pac X branding and rebuild an Olympic sports conference in their image.
See the following:
Cal
Stanford
Hawaii
UC Santa Barbara
UC Davis
UC Irvine
UC Riverside
UC San Diego
Cal and Stanford could keep the precious P4 designation in football and have a strong Olympic sports conference.
The B12 doesn’t want them.Wouldn't Cal and Stanford just be better off joining the Big 12 and actually be in a P4 conference? Rationalize it by saying 6/12 of the PAC merged with Big 12, 4/12 of the PAC merged with the B1G, and 2/12 were sacrificed.
Syracuse's value to the ACC was that it was a member of a rival conference it was trying to kill off, and eventually did. That's it. It has no material I'm going presence in NYC, and is noted above it's actually farther away from NYC then Storrs Connecticut.Everything you say about SU is true. All I'm saying is SU is a private university which has a strong connection to NYC and that connection is why it is in the ACC. Lots of wealthy kids go to SU because who else is paying that ridiculous tuition and then they go to the Big Apple when they graduate. (FBS programs in state). New York (3) is a state with 20 million people, 4th most populous state behind Cali (7), Texas (13) and Florida (7). Yet NY has only 3 FBS football programs, none of which are winning championships: Army, Buffalo, Syracuse. That's why SU is valuable to the ACC.
It does and it doesn't. Will say as a CT native but an alum of Ithaca that there's a large presence downstate alum so it's not crazy that Cuse can bring a presence (witness Ithaca drawing for 45k and 40k for their rivalry games in 19 and 23). When I've done Uconn/Cause at the garden while there's more Huskies fans, it's more a 60/40 split with the big difference being Uconns student section is packed and Cuse's is empty. So they bring a fanbase to the tristate but a measure smaller than UConn.Syracuse's value to the ACC was that it was a member of a rival conference it was trying to kill off, and eventually did. That's it. It has no material I'm going presence in NYC, and is noted above it's actually farther away from NYC then Storrs Connecticut.