The network was fully owned by the PAC. The tournament credits, maybe? The headquarters building? The supply of designer coffee and really expensive, gold laced toilet paper? It’s one of the WV Twitterati so who knows what’s he’s talking about?What the hell is a PAC asset?
The Big12/Yormark were not due a new contract before the PAC12. That was Yormark's genius. Convincing them to cut the line on the PAC and grabbing the last lifeboat of network money. Visionary type stuff.
Yeah, but it was brilliant to look to negotiate before the PAC more importantly, he got his presidents to accept a reasonable offer while Kliavkoff let his presidents send him back to ask for 20 million more per school per year. That's an insane negotiating tactic. One commissioner got his presidents to be reasonable and one allowed his to be delusional. That's the real difference. It wasn't random luck.It was the last lifeboat from the standpoint that ESPN offered 2 leagues, the PAC 12 and Big 12, virtually the same deal, and whichever league took it was going to buy the other one with ESPN’s and Fox’s money. At the end of the day, most of the PAC 12 is going to find a home.
As I said, the Big 12 just happened to have their hand out when ESPN was willing to write a big check.
Yeah, but it was brilliant to look to negotiate before the PAC more importantly, he got his presidents to accept a reasonable offer while Kliavkoff let his presidents send him back to ask for 20 million more per school per year. That's an insane negotiating tactic. One commissioner got his presidents to be reasonable and one allowed his to be delusional. That's the real difference. It wasn't random luck.
Sounded like we are always a means to the end. Never a lock. Fudge him
That is random luck.The guy who picks the winning lottery numbers is brilliant for picking those numbers. It doesn’t mean he is going to win the lottery again.
ACC is shaking down ESPN for more money. I think they will get it.
Seems like everything points to Az St and Utah being off the board until Wash and Ore left. That's how we were 14.GoKU had us at 14, but Greg Flugar always said that we were behind Arizona, Arizona State and Utah. Greg also indicated that there was legitimate interest by Yormark. The disconnect with the order of priority schools is what confused me. Greg and GoKU have different sources. Perhaps what Yormark wanted differed from the presidents.
Canzano said:What the hell is a PAC asset?
I agree this wouldn’t be bad for us (re football only) but our hoops is what makes us attractive.Still think the best way forward is the below:
Stanford
Cal
Oregon State
Washington State
San Diego State
UNLV
Colorado State
Gonzaga
Saint Mary's
Loyola Marymount
Santa Clara
UConn (football only)
Army/Navy (football only)
Good Olympic sports, academics and eastern football presence.
Yeah but we also provide an eastern presence for TV.I agree this wouldn’t be bad for us (re football only) but our hoops is what makes us attractive.
One of the writers tweeted (can’t find it right now) that the PAC had a $30M/team offer from ESPN in 2022 and rejected it.Yeah, but it was brilliant to look to negotiate before the PAC more importantly,
One of the writers tweeted (can’t find it right now) that the PAC had a $30M/team offer from ESPN in 2022 and rejected it.
This video talks about an Athletic.com article stating that Amazon was a player until Colorado exited. They had a small linear component that would have made the PAC members much more comfortable with the deal.One of the writers tweeted (can’t find it right now) that the PAC had a $30M/team offer from ESPN in 2022 and rejected it.
That's a shame. The MWC should at least buy the PAC name if not its obligations
How’s Santa Clara going to be a full member when they don’t play football?Still think the best way forward is the below:
Stanford
Cal
Oregon State
Washington State
San Diego State
UNLV
Colorado State
Gonzaga
Saint Mary's
Loyola Marymount
Santa Clara
UConn (football only)
Army/Navy (football only)
Good Olympic sports, academics and eastern football presence.