- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,768
- Reaction Score
- 351,262
Gosh it must suck to be those schools knowing your partners were conspiring against you. Wonder what that feels like?
Gosh it must suck to be those schools knowing your partners were conspiring against you. Wonder what that feels like?
I'm not so sure that changing conferences necessarily destroys a fanbase. I am confident, however, that the inability to compete at the highest levels of the sport does destroy a fanbase.So would the likes of UNC and Virginia move their sports to a P2 only to lose their fan base. Not to mention in spite of revenue, how many do not make a profit? Also, what’s more important to the fan base? Winning or AD profitability?
I'm struggling to understand that verbiage, but profit maximization is for the vast majority of organizations the reason why they exist. So the pursuit of more profits is never futile, and is often critical to continued existence. I think that's the case in athletics right now. The Pac 12 got a deal that was worth, minimally five times what we make in the big east. It wasn't sufficient to hold that organization together given the fact that the next closest competitor is making nearly 8 times what we make in the Big East.People always mention money, but throwing more money at others who have more money than you becomes futile and won’t produce wins.
Let me rephrase.I'm not so sure that changing conferences necessarily destroys a fanbase. I am confident, however, that the inability to compete at the highest levels of the sport does destroy a fanbase.
I'm struggling to understand that verbiage, but profit maximization is for the vast majority of organizations the reason why they exist. So the pursuit of more profits is never futile, and is often critical to continued existence. I think that's the case in athletics right now. The Pac 12 got a deal that was worth, minimally five times what we make in the big east. It wasn't sufficient to hold that organization together given the fact that the next closest competitor is making nearly 8 times what we make in the Big East.
I hear you and agree, somewhat, but in the end teams need to be competitive financially in order to compete at the highest levels. That's the issue.Let me rephrase.
In the realm of sports fans, they are not cheering on their schools to be the most profitable, there are cheering on theirs schools to beat other schools, especially ones where they have a personal grudge against. Beating BC felt so good last year. The do realize that more money is needed to achieve the winning goals but whether it comes from ESPN or some billionaire alumni doesn’t matter. And, to thump their chests, they’d love others to see it and acknowledge they are the best.
At least that’s how I see it.
Gosh it must suck to be those schools knowing your partners were conspiring against you. Wonder what that feels like?
I agree.I hear you and agree, somewhat, but in the end teams need to be competitive financially in order to compete at the highest levels. That's the issue.
Stanford $36 BillionCal: Endowment: $6.9 billion (2022)/UConn $602 million
I really wonder with the ACC revenue sharing issues whether they could garner enough support to add anyone? Not an easy situation, with a leader as well who doesn't seem to have a good diplomatic relationship with some of the critical players.Is there any chance the ACC would expand now or would we need to wait until a team like FSU/Clemson leaves?
I think the ACC leftovers would be beyond stupid if they don't want to expand now. However, they are tied to the dumb long-term contract they signed with ESPN, and there isn't an automatic clause to pay the new team(s) more money pro rata so that will have to be negotiated with ESPN.Is there any chance the ACC would expand now or would we need to wait until a team like FSU/Clemson leaves?
Yeah, it's all about ESPN. But ESPN was willing to pay for UConn in the Big XII. So it should be possible. ESPN gets better value for UConn in the ACC and shuts the Big XII out of the east.I think the ACC leftovers would be beyond stupid if they don't want to expand now. However, they are tied to the dumb long-term contract they signed with ESPN, and there isn't an automatic clause to pay the new team(s) more money pro rata so that will have to be negotiated with ESPN.
The question isn't if the ACC would like to expand or not, the real question is if ESPN is interested in paying some money to get some extra inventory. I am not sure what is the worth of UCONN, but our men's and women's basketball content got to be worth something.
The big east is not G5Right now the perception is P5 > G5. Like it or not, regardless of athletic budget or the success of our sports teams, we are "G5" and therefore perceived as inferior. The four corners school made more geographic sense, if not strategic sense. They were a familiar choice by people who don't understand our program, our fan base, our history and our potential. I understand the decision, even if I don't agree with it.
I'm not sure that they "hurt their brand" so much as missed on an opportunity to maximize it.
Endowments can't be used on Sports. Whatever donated money goes to sports is already included in fundraising revenues.Cal: Endowment: $6.9 billion (2022)/UConn $602 million
Good point. Connecticut is an unaffiliated independent. I don't think that's better if your name isn't Notre Dame.The big east is not G5
Do Cal and Stanford want to have their athletes travel across the country for every sport frequently. And what about east coast teams heading to Calif regularlyReminder: ACC is at 15. I suggested adding Cal, Stanford and UConn to get to 18. Makes them much stronger if any school manages to buy their way out.
The entire excise was to lock Apple out. You know this.If this happens, then the entire exercise last week was to lock Apple out.