First, FOX/FS1 has been blocked out of men's basketball tournaments/championships in the new conference media deals. Do you agree with that? Next, the Big 10 will have 45 men's basketball games on FOX/FS1 in their new media deal which is about equal to what they broadcast now. Do you agree with that? Right now, FOX/FS1 will lose 22 Pac 12 games. Do you agree with that? Yes, the Big 12 basketball inventory is new, but not defined as to the number yet but ESPN will still broadcast basketball games as well.You're disputing the quote from the article above?
Not to mention the B1G will now have 16 (up from 14) teams and the Big12 will have 12 (up from 10).
What time slots would the Big East possibly overlap with the Pac anyway?
I'd be interested in being proven wrong if it's the case - I just don't see how it adds up the way you are saying it to be.
First, FOX/FS1 has been blocked out of men's basketball tournaments/championships in the new conference media deals. Do you agree with that? Next, the Big 10 will have 45 men's basketball games on FOX/FS1 in their new media deal which is about equal to what they broadcast now. Do you agree with that? Right now, FOX/FS1 will lose 22 Pac 12 games. Do you agree with that? Yes, the Big 12 basketball inventory is new, but not defined as to the number yet but ESPN will still broadcast basketball games as well.
FOX/FS1 is currently broadcasting ~ 20 games Big East games on FOX and over 100 games on FS1 plus the entire Big East Tournament.
Let's assume FOX/FS1 gets 60 Big 12 basketball games and loses the Big East TV package (as well as the Pac 12). That would mean FOX/FS1 goes from ~190 mens's college basketball games plus a conference tournament to 110 games with no conference tournament. So, yes, I think losing the Big East will create a big hole in FOX's college basketball coverage.
The problem is YOU aren’t THEY but you stand a chance of being paid like them. There’s exactly 1 brand in The Big East. Maybe 1.5 depending on how important you consider Villanova. The rest of the teams in The Big East are worth about .10 on the dollar. More problematic is that they know it and are happy to get it. Does anyone here think Butler or Creighton gives a rip what happens to UConn Football as long as they can ride your coattails in basketball?There's 2 years before the contract expires and they are not competing with P5 conferences. The situation is not even close to being the same.
If the B12 is to be believed and basketball is undervalued, why would one of the best basketball leagues in the country with a well know brand not be able to take advantage of it?
The PAC is like George Costanza avoiding a break up by avoiding his girlfriend. As long as they don't announce their media deal no one will leave.
I’d take ACC in a second. B12 or ACC, take the first that would offer. ACC gets us better travel, better matchups. Plenty of former BE opponents. Even if we miss out on a “potential” 5m a year, it’s a huge raise and the best possible geographic fit.Maybe I missed the debate.
Knowing everything we now know, would people still prefer ACC invite today assuming we got invite over Big 12 invite?
Assume full shares happen at same time.
I’m not sure ACC is better. Would UConn lock up media rights until 2036?
Definitely the B12. Screw the ACC due to its history. Won't mind be in a conference with NC schools and Virginia, but the old Big East backstabbers are too much.Maybe I missed the debate.
Knowing everything we now know, would people still prefer ACC invite today assuming we got invite over Big 12 invite?
Assume full shares happen at same time.
I’m not sure ACC is better. Would UConn lock up media rights until 2036?
I would.Maybe I missed the debate.
Knowing everything we now know, would people still prefer ACC invite today assuming we got invite over Big 12 invite?
Assume full shares happen at same time.
I’m not sure ACC is better. Would UConn lock up media rights until 2036?
Wait... Big 12 isn't a good geographic fit but leaving the AAC, which has a very similar geographic footprint, was the wrong call? lmfao at least try to have some consistencyI just think we are not a good geographic fit for the Big 12. We are not in a good recruiting area and our football program does not draw any fan interest from any team in the Big 12. We put ourselves in this position by leaving the AAC. We needed to do what Cincinnati did, stay the course, win the conference and make the playoffs. They had much better management than we did. We didn’t need the Big East to win another title in hoops.
Wait... Big 12 isn't a good geographic fit but leaving the AAC, which has a very similar geographic footprint, was the wrong call? lmfao at least try to have some consistency
One pays you. The other cut your salary and asked you to self produce content at your cost.Wait... Big 12 isn't a good geographic fit but leaving the AAC, which has a very similar geographic footprint, was the wrong call? lmfao at least try to have some consistency
That post is insane.That.
Or that we needed to do what cincy did, which worked out for them because they got a big 12 invite…which apparently we don’t want?
He’s had a few of the strangest posts I’ve seen on this board
It would be nice to have choices. It would get us out of the limbo that we find ourselves in due to the perception that we will always be available.
Absolutely, take the first to offer, even though I believe the big 12 is better positioned to survive.
If anything happens then I'll say yes, it's a coincidence. The first line literally says an invite doesn't exist. If this was a piece put out to guide the fanbase then they wouldn't have included that and let people speculate.Coincidence for early next week? We shall see..
Coincidence for early next week? We shall see..