Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell. | Page 493 | The Boneyard

Key tweets, and it's all gone to Hell.

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
91,760
Reaction Score
351,232
From the NHR editorial board to the UConn BOT eyes and ears...
This one was from the "Hearst Connecticut Media Editorial Board" which now covers the Connecticut Post, Greenwich Time, Journal Inquirer of Manchester, New Haven Register, Stamford Advocate, The Middletown Press, The News-Times, The Norwalk Hour and The Register Citizen. Have to see if the Courant takes a similar stance.
 

BlueandOG

We are not amused.
Joined
May 5, 2015
Messages
1,561
Reaction Score
8,106
I’d take ACC in a second. B12 or ACC, take the first that would offer. ACC gets us better travel, better matchups. Plenty of former BE opponents. Even if we miss out on a “potential” 5m a year, it’s a huge raise and the best possible geographic fit.
This is short sighted. The ACC is better than our current situation, but it is not better long-term than the Big 12. The Big 12 is setting itself as a Power 3 conference with SEC and B1G. ACC will implode when the GOR ends and FSU, UNC, Clemson, Virginia, and/or GT bolt for one of the Power 3.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
481
Reaction Score
681
The ACC is better long term than the B12. They have their own network and their TV contract will exceed the B12 in 2026. The ACC gets about 60% of their ESPN revenue in the last ten years of their contract. The contract is as usual back loaded given the upfront cost of building the ACC network. This is why the ACC is not expanding. They have 5 of the top 20 TV markets compared to 8 for the B1G. The ACC is set up very well long term. They just need FSU & Miami to get back to the level of Clemson.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,569
Reaction Score
5,118
The ACC is better long term than the B12. They have their own network and their TV contract will exceed the B12 in 2026. The ACC gets about 60% of their ESPN revenue in the last ten years of their contract. The contract is as usual back loaded given the upfront cost of building the ACC network. This is why the ACC is not expanding. They have 5 of the top 20 TV markets compared to 8 for the B1G. The ACC is set up very well long term. They just need FSU & Miami to get back to the level of Clemson.
If they are so great why are their football leaders trying everything they can to get out? They are making less than the B1G, SEC, and Big 12. The conference is positioned to break apart as soon as those schools can afford to leave. Forget about ND. Their nascent AAU status is a signal that when they need to join a conference, it will indeed be the Big Ten. Maybe a new conference will form with the remnants of the ACC and some of the eastern Big 12 schools in a decade or so. At least UConn will be in the mix if they get the invite now.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2023
Messages
163
Reaction Score
3,168
Two weeks ago Colorado/UConn to the Big 12 seemed like a sure thing. Now Colorado is wavering. The Big12 thought they were coming, but 50% chance now. I guess the bottom line is this....crap PAC media deal Colorado/UConn in the Big 12. Decent media deal probably no expansion. No other PAC school is coming. Makes no sense, but that's what I'm hearing.
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
1,363
Reaction Score
2,680
The ACC is better long term than the B12. They have their own network and their TV contract will exceed the B12 in 2026. The ACC gets about 60% of their ESPN revenue in the last ten years of their contract. The contract is as usual back loaded given the upfront cost of building the ACC network. This is why the ACC is not expanding. They have 5 of the top 20 TV markets compared to 8 for the B1G. The ACC is set up very well long term. They just need FSU & Miami to get back to the level of Clemson.

The ACC is a dead article long term and the B12 will harvest from the remains when b10 and SEC takes its pieces. This is obvious The B10 and SEC have done what they wanted the whole time.

Two weeks ago Colorado/UConn to the Big 12 seemed like a sure thing. Now Colorado is wavering. The Big12 thought they were coming, but 50% chance now. I guess the bottom line is this....crap PAC media deal Colorado/UConn in the Big 12. Decent media deal probably no expansion. No other PAC school is coming. Makes no sense, but that's what I'm hearing.

It was always contingent on the PAC getting their act together. Maybe the winds inside Colorado changed.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,814
Reaction Score
9,571
Everyone awaits the PAC media deal/places so much attention on it, but I think even if the PAC's deal equals the Big12's the final analysis will show that the Big12 will make a significant amount more in ancillary revenue including tournament payouts, creative marketing streams, etc.

Through those ancillary revenues, let's say Big12 schools make an extra 10m more annually. That's 10m more you can put into fb coaching staffs and recruiting budgets. In turn you can communicate to donors to not put funds into the general athletic fund/earmarked to fb but rather to pour their donations into NIL collectives. That's a huge advantage in terms of attracting players. Seems like that alone would make it easy math for the Colorados of the PAC to split. But of course there are other aspects in the decision to stay or go. Should be interesting to watch what happens.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,339
Reaction Score
8,781
From the NHR editorial board to the UConn BOT eyes and ears. We have to get this done. The BE is a one dimensional, small catholic school conference. We are the square peg in a round hole! There is much more to an athletic department than men's BB. Besides, we will not be taking a step back in that regard anyways.
Perfectly said.
 

Samoo

Providence-Newark-San Antonio
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,122
Reaction Score
6,210
Everyone awaits the PAC media deal/places so much attention on it, but I think even if the PAC's deal equals the Big12's the final analysis will show that the Big12 will make a significant amount more in ancillary revenue including tournament payouts, creative marketing streams, etc.

Through those ancillary revenues, let's say Big12 schools make an extra 10m more annually. That's 10m more you can put into fb coaching staffs and recruiting budgets. In turn you can communicate to donors to not put funds into the general athletic fund/earmarked to fb but rather to pour their donations into NIL collectives. That's a huge advantage in terms of attracting players. Seems like that alone would make it easy math for the Colorados of the PAC to split. But of course there are other aspects in the decision to stay or go. Should be interesting to watch what happens.
Hopefully enough to drag Colorado away but not so much that it attracts the Arizonas that have more ties to the PAC.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,410
Reaction Score
4,168
The Pac needs a GOR to get a decent media deal. I don’t think that Oregon, Washington, Colorado or the AZ schools are inclined to sign something that ties them to the PAC. Losing the LA teams was a killer for the league.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
2,569
Reaction Score
5,118
Two weeks ago Colorado/UConn to the Big 12 seemed like a sure thing. Now Colorado is wavering. The Big12 thought they were coming, but 50% chance now. I guess the bottom line is this....crap PAC media deal Colorado/UConn in the Big 12. Decent media deal probably no expansion. No other PAC school is coming. Makes no sense, but that's what I'm hearing.
Colorado AD abruptly left the PAC-12 media days immediately following the commissioners talk. Speculation is rebuilding about them leaving now.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,190
Reaction Score
9,198
Colorado AD abruptly left the PAC-12 media days immediately following the commissioners talk. Speculation is rebuilding about them leaving now.
Hope so. What a dog show the PAC is.

How can the main PAC schools sign a GOR maturing in excess of 5 years? Coupled with what University wants to stay in a conference that has had a terrible time trying to get a short term media deal? Yipes.

As public institutions I wonder if they can be sued for stupid business decisions.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 7, 2012
Messages
301
Reaction Score
2,026

1690047660322.png
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
2,195
Reaction Score
8,993
Hope so. What a dog show the PAC is.

How can the main PAC schools sign a GOR maturing in excess of 5 years? Coupled with what University wants to stay in a conference that has had a terrible time trying to get a short term media deal? Yipes.

As public institutions I wonder if they can be sued for stupid business decisions.
The real issue is that The Big 12 is not an attractive option to anyone in The PAC outside of The Colorado Football Building. The rest of the schools have been together for a long time and would likely choose less money and staying together over more money and aligning with what they believe to be inferior academic institutions, city schools and religious universities. Its why they're willing to wait on whatever crap deal their president is trying to sell them on.

The true strength of the Big 12 is that it is the best option for everyone in it. Outside of Kansas every team has zero shot at The P2. They are in the best place they can ever hope to be. They'll sign any GOR because where are they going to go? The fallacy was this idea that they needed PAC Schools. That's bull. The conference can make the teams just as much as the teams can make the conferece. They could add UConn and SDSU tomorrow and return far more value in terms of competing for championships, recruiting territories added for football and basketball, and assistance with the conference's initiatives in both NYC(Uconn) and Mexico(SDSU) Instead they hold a candle for underwhelming Colorado and Arizona.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2016
Messages
63
Reaction Score
255
The real issue is that The Big 12 is not an attractive option to anyone in The PAC outside of The Colorado Football Building. The rest of the schools have been together for a long time and would likely choose less money and staying together over more money and aligning with what they believe to be inferior academic institutions, city schools and religious universities. Its why they're willing to wait on whatever crap deal their president is trying to sell them on.

The true strength of the Big 12 is that it is the best option for everyone in it. Outside of Kansas every team has zero shot at The P2. They are in the best place they can ever hope to be. They'll sign any GOR because where are they going to go? The fallacy was this idea that they needed PAC Schools. That's bull. The conference can make the teams just as much as the teams can make the conferece. They could add UConn and SDSU tomorrow and return far more value in terms of competing for championships, recruiting territories added for football and basketball, and assistance with the conference's initiatives in both NYC(Uconn) and Mexico(SDSU) Instead they hold a candle for underwhelming Colorado and Arizona.
So true! Nailed it.
 

dayooper

It's what I do. I drink and I know things.
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
1,734
Reaction Score
4,565
The real issue is that The Big 12 is not an attractive option to anyone in The PAC outside of The Colorado Football Building. The rest of the schools have been together for a long time and would likely choose less money and staying together over more money and aligning with what they believe to be inferior academic institutions, city schools and religious universities. Its why they're willing to wait on whatever crap deal their president is trying to sell them on.

The true strength of the Big 12 is that it is the best option for everyone in it. Outside of Kansas every team has zero shot at The P2. They are in the best place they can ever hope to be. They'll sign any GOR because where are they going to go? The fallacy was this idea that they needed PAC Schools. That's bull. The conference can make the teams just as much as the teams can make the conferece. They could add UConn and SDSU tomorrow and return far more value in terms of competing for championships, recruiting territories added for football and basketball, and assistance with the conference's initiatives in both NYC(Uconn) and Mexico(SDSU) Instead they hold a candle for underwhelming Colorado and Arizona.
Took the words right out of my mouth.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,190
Reaction Score
9,198
The real issue is that The Big 12 is not an attractive option to anyone in The PAC outside of The Colorado Football Building. The rest of the schools have been together for a long time and would likely choose less money and staying together over more money and aligning with what they believe to be inferior academic institutions, city schools and religious universities. Its why they're willing to wait on whatever crap deal their president is trying to sell them on.

The true strength of the Big 12 is that it is the best option for everyone in it. Outside of Kansas every team has zero shot at The P2. They are in the best place they can ever hope to be. They'll sign any GOR because where are they going to go? The fallacy was this idea that they needed PAC Schools. That's bull. The conference can make the teams just as much as the teams can make the conferece. They could add UConn and SDSU tomorrow and return far more value in terms of competing for championships, recruiting territories added for football and basketball, and assistance with the conference's initiatives in both NYC(Uconn) and Mexico(SDSU) Instead they hold a candle for underwhelming Colorado and Arizona.
Great post.

So to revise a quote from Kevin Millar (Cowboy Up) I think it’s time to Buffalo Up
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
174
Reaction Score
829
The real issue is that The Big 12 is not an attractive option to anyone in The PAC outside of The Colorado Football Building. The rest of the schools have been together for a long time and would likely choose less money and staying together over more money and aligning with what they believe to be inferior academic institutions, city schools and religious universities. Its why they're willing to wait on whatever crap deal their president is trying to sell them on.

The true strength of the Big 12 is that it is the best option for everyone in it. Outside of Kansas every team has zero shot at The P2. They are in the best place they can ever hope to be. They'll sign any GOR because where are they going to go? The fallacy was this idea that they needed PAC Schools. That's bull. The conference can make the teams just as much as the teams can make the conferece. They could add UConn and SDSU tomorrow and return far more value in terms of competing for championships, recruiting territories added for football and basketball, and assistance with the conference's initiatives in both NYC(Uconn) and Mexico(SDSU) Instead they hold a candle for underwhelming Colorado and Arizona.
Best summary to date.
 

Online statistics

Members online
419
Guests online
2,160
Total visitors
2,579

Forum statistics

Threads
159,565
Messages
4,195,975
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom