Waquoit
Mr. Positive
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 32,565
- Reaction Score
- 83,930
He's reminds me of Mike Boguslawski:I think the difference this time is Yormark.
He's reminds me of Mike Boguslawski:I think the difference this time is Yormark.
Way to dodge the issue with a garbage reply.
Show me a realistic model where UConn makes more in a 20-team B12 than in a 12-team B12 and then we can converse like adults.
If the Big 12 is 12 teams UConn makes 0 dollars from the Big 12 because they have added no more teams and UConn is on the outside looking in. If the Big 12 is 20 teams and UConn is included, they make whatever the agreed upon rate is which will be more than 0 dollars.Way to dodge the issue with a garbage reply.
Show me a realistic model where UConn makes more in a 20-team B12 than in a 12-team B12 and then we can converse like adults.
When the Big 12 merges with the Big 10 and adds UConn to become the Big 23Way to dodge the issue with a garbage reply.
Show me a realistic model where UConn makes more in a 20-team B12 than in a 12-team B12 and then we can converse like adults.
They could make more, the same, or less, depending on what they negotiate and structure in a media deal. Whatever it is, it will be more than $7M in the Catholic Sisters of the Hoop Faithful conference.Way to dodge the issue with a garbage reply.
Show me a realistic model where UConn makes more in a 20-team B12 than in a 12-team B12 and then we can converse like adults.
Was that so hard to do instead the dumb reply posted earlier?Wow you are really po’d about the b12, lol. how about this info from @CL82 in another thread and there are rumors we get a full share. Need to see the final deal to be certain. See you at the Yale home games.
View attachment 88645
Was that so hard to do instead the dumb reply posted earlier?
No, I'm not "pissed" at the B12. It's not my ideal, but it's something. My point was about the post prior that basically stated that the more teams added - and they named four ACC teams - the more money to go around - with increased member payouts all around. That makes zero economic sense.
You don't know whether there will be an offer, or what it might be. Most of us have a sense based upon the current contract that it would be substantially more than what we get now. And also be a substantially more stable, competitive, and promoted product for most if not all sports moving forward. That's plenty good for me.Was that so hard to do instead the dumb reply posted earlier?
No, I'm not "pissed" at the B12. It's not my ideal, but it's something. My point was about the post prior that basically stated that the more teams added - and they named four ACC teams - the more money to go around - with increased member payouts all around. That makes zero economic sense.
I think a lot of people would be angered by that.When the Big 12 merges with the Big 10 and adds UConn to become the Big 23
Brett is an ass. Loves squatting on UConn as well.Why is he making fun of USF? Not a good look, Brett.
He doesn’t know. Just a fan.I thought the UConn-Big 12 talks were further along than that.
Same here but I think a lot can happen between now and the end of the month. Just a long weekend in a cabin with AD Dave and you never know.I thought the UConn-Big 12 talks were further along than that.
Why is he making fun of USF? Not a good look, Brett.
Brett is an ass. Loves squatting on UConn as well.
It’s got enough legs that multiple reporters are hearing it’s done. The big east thinks it needs to raise the exit fees. Our football coaches are spending lots of time recruiting Texas recently. It seems like all but a formal invitation at this point.I thought the UConn-Big 12 talks were further along than that.
And if we announce we leave before July 1st also won’t matter.Unless they raise it over $30 million, it doesn't matter to us one way or the other.
It’s happening.And if we announce we leave before July 1st also won’t matter.