Bottom line is that "emphasizing" is one thing, but a consistent winning tradition is 99% of it. At the end of the day, the bottom line is you have to continually be competitive in football to get noticed, and be a candidate to move up.
I'm not on twitter, but I've thought about emailing these guys, with a link to our on-campus facilities. They are P5 level. I don't think they even know about that.Pundits get paid to spew any thought that'll create clicks, sigh. I really don't get tied up in their opinions but draw the line and reply to said posts when they throw around inaccurate info/facts. Even that has become a part time job.
Movement is good for us. Status quo is bad for us.Doesn't this latest batch of articles make it look like we've just jumped off the carrousel but landed inside a tornado?
Lazy journalists are lazy. They are easily manipulated. They have been manipulated into believing UConn gave up on football. They can become evangelists if fed the right information.
I'd love to see UConn put out an aggressive puff piece about the football program. Show the long history (we didn't start a team from scratch when moving to D1), the accelerated move to D1, and the unprecedented speed of success. Own the hiring of a few bad coaches and compare it to others that made the same mistakes (without naming the programs). Show how pissed off fans were because they care. Then show the rebirth and excitement while tying it in to how successful every program at UConn is. For "journalists" (I use that term lightly) that are deemed to be truly influential, get the AD in front of them with the full PR press. I guarantee these bozos will become huge fans.
This is exactly what UConn needs to do. They need to start planting stories. The journalists have obviously read the articles about Benedict saying that it would be a difficult decision, because they've referenced them, so they would read these stories, too. Also, throw in a discussion of UConn+ and that we are ready for digital streaming or being part of a network. That UConn has P5 facilities, although most other schools and fans probably don't know it.May AD Dave or Jim Mora can reach out to the “key” journalists and explain why the lazy narrative wrong for Football It cannot hurt. UConn AD lurkers, can you help make this happen please?
You can "plant" multiple stories galore but no one is going to forget the poor quality of the football team during the 2010s and beyond until Mora showed up. This why some of us on the Boneyard were so critical of the team then while others found lots of rationalizations for the team's record. There must be accountability for the dumpster fire of a program and a clear path forward so we have conference options ahead. And when we bring up a possible on campus football stadium, we really have UConn's long-term outlook at heart.This is exactly what UConn needs to do. They need to start planting stories. The journalists have obviously read the articles about Benedict saying that it would be a difficult decision, because they've referenced them, so they would read these stories, too. Also, throw in a discussion of UConn+ and that we are ready for digital streaming or being part of a network. That UConn has P5 facilities, although most other schools and fans probably don't know it.
Lastly, UConn needs to update the athletic department website with videos of Werth, Burton, and Shenkman. There may be one video and a few photos, but they really need to showcase them.
Go back and read the stories of how Chris DelConte got TCU into the Big 12, how Tim Pernetti got Rutgers into the B1G, and Jurich got Louisville into the ACC. They didn't sit around and do nothing. They promoted their schools.
In all candor the quality of our scheduling as an independent has been far better than I could have hoped for when it was announced that we were returning to the BE.
82, you have an open invitation to any home game. It will only cost you time. I'll provide tickets and you can eat and drink at my tailgate.
The home games this season aren't easy. UConn has NEVER beaten the Wolfpack or Aggies. Duke has been VERY competative as late. The only "guaranteed wins" are FIU, USF, & Sacred Heart, & that's only if UConn makes measurable leaps in Coach Mora's 2nd year & the team avoids the injury plague.The home schedule was always going to be a tough job and AD Dave did a very nice job the last couple years but the next three seasons are dreadful.
23: NC State, Duke, FIU, Utah State, USF, Sacred Heart
24: Army, FAU, Buffalo, Temple, Georgia State
25: Central, Ball State, FIU, UAB, UMass
The home games this season aren't easy. UConn has NEVER beaten the Wolfpack or Aggies. Duke has been VERY competative as late. The only "guaranteed wins" are FIU, USF, & Sacred Heart, & that's only if UConn makes measurable leaps in Coach Mora's 2nd year & the team avoids the injury plague.
And when we bring up a possible on campus football stadium, we really have UConn's long-term outlook at heart.
I understand your concerns, but some day take a drive on Discovery Drive located on the UConn campus. It is a wide roadway that leads to Route 44. It has plenty of room there for a stadium and tailgating. Route 195 could be closed to all but local traffic during home games. Let the motorists use 44 to get home. The new stadium and related buildings could also be used by the new innovation partnership building and related uses that tie UConn's research with corporations. Try to keep an open mind. Let Central CT take over the Rent. It's close to their lovely campus.There's very little chance of development for an on campus football stadium. Rt 195 can barely handle traffic for a game at Gampel. With only 6 dates a year, Rentschler is a home that is accessible to current students and alumni when you consider an all day event that includes tailgating. The student body in Storrs isn't large enough to justify another 30-40k stadium when they already have one relatively nearby - albeit P&W Stadium will need to be upgraded prior to a first game in the B12.
As to Rutgers, the Big Ten reached out to them and gave them specific areas to work on without promising them anything. Rutgers really didn't promote itself at all, other than responding the Big Ten request for information. It was made absolutely clear to them that if they talked about any of the discussion publicly any possibility to join the Big Ten would be lost.Go back and read the stories of how Chris DelConte got TCU into the Big 12, how Tim Pernetti got Rutgers into the B1G
24 does have a handful of northeastern schools, which is nice. The bright side is you would hope UConn can provide a combined 7-8 wins for the home fans during 24/25.This upcoming season is certainly the most attractive schedule of the three years, but overall it's a tough slate of games to sell season tickets against - particularly when you know the athletic department will be giving seats away for free for the last couple games.
24 and 25 are just abysmal.
This season is not bad. 2 ACC opponents, USF (former Big East opponent), and Utah State (competitive MW program) is a pretty solid slate. FIU and Sacred Heart don't do anything for me, but no program has six can't miss home games.This upcoming season is certainly the most attractive schedule of the three years, but overall it's a tough slate of games to sell season tickets against - particularly when you know the athletic department will be giving seats away for free for the last couple games.
24 and 25 are just abysmal.
Away games - even if the home slate isn't great at least some of the away games are driveable. I mean, they are all drivable but 4 in the Northeast and Maryland. That's nice.This season is not bad. 2 ACC opponents, USF (former Big East opponent), and Utah State (competitive MW program) is a pretty solid slate. FIU and Sacred Heart don't do anything for me, but no program has six can't miss home games.
According to this story, it was Rutgers who reached out to the Big Ten. Delaney told Rutgers there was less than a 10% chance that Rutgers would be added. Did Rutgers give up? No, they kept reaching out to Delaney and talking about how they could bring the NY market. Is UConn doing anything remotely like this?As to Rutgers, the Big Ten reached out to them and gave them specific areas to work on without promising them anything. Rutgers really didn't promote itself at all, other than responding the Big Ten request for information. It was made absolutely clear to them that if they talked about any of the discussion publicly any possibility to join the Big Ten would be lost.
( A friend of mine was aware of this as it was going on and would periodically casually allude to it. My response to that was to tell him he was delusional. As it turns out, he was aware of it in real time, but wouldn't say more. It's since been discussed publicly in several articles.)
Good long article here:According to this story, it was Rutgers who reached out to the Big Ten. Delaney told Rutgers there was less than a 10% chance that Rutgers would be added. Did Rutgers give up? No, they kept reaching out to Delaney and talking about how they could bring the NY market. Is UConn doing anything remotely like this?
"Prior to becoming Rutgers’ athletic director in 2009, Tim Pernetti reached out to Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany to ask a very bold question:
If the Big Ten expanded, would Rutgers, then a member of the Big East, get a real look?
Pernetti, a former media executive before going to work for his alma mater, knew that Rutgers held one significant advantage over every other expansion candidate — access to the New York TV market.
Delany’s response was firm and to the point. He told Pernetti that Rutgers had a single-digit percent chance of being invited to the Big Ten.
“Well, that’s good enough for me,” Pernetti replied.
Over time, Pernetti’s calls to Delany became more frequent. He’d call Delany early in the morning when the commissioner was usually on the treadmill, and talked about how Rutgers’ TV market would boost the Big Ten Network’s audience."
![]()
Delany’s vision led Big Ten to add Rutgers
www.sportsbusinessjournal.com
It was a bad look for Susan and Warde, no doubt about it, but Jurich's victory lap notwithstanding, I wonder how much of it was based upon FSU's desire to flex it's muscles against Tobacco Road. Still, one wonders whether things would've been different if we were plugging away instead of sipping piña coladas.And here is Jurich working to get Louisville into the ACC. Note the sense of urgency on the part of the AD, just like in the case of TCU and Rutgers. Also, Jurich canceled his trip to the Bahamas; Warde Manuel and Susan Herbst did not cancel their trip.
"Then, on the morning of Nov. 17, Jurich learned that Rutgers and Maryland were expected to join the Big Ten. Suddenly, the situation became more urgent, the opportunity more realistic.
Jurich canceled his trip to the Bahamas, where Louisville's basketball team was playing in the Battle 4 Atlantis tournament, and he combed through the contact list he had gathered over 24 years as an athletic director.
He made progress with with Florida State athletics director Randy Spetman, whom he had befriended when Spetman was at Air Force and Jurich was at Colorado State. He found an ally in Syracuse athletics director Daryl Gross, a fellow Big East AD who had navigated through realignment just one year earlier.
Ramsey, who was an economics professor at the University of North Carolina, said his connection to the university helped, too. Still, they had to convince the ACC that Louisville was a better option than Connecticut, which seemed to have the advantage in academics, geography and market size.
"We were definitely the underdogs," Jurich said. "People had UConn not penciled in, but penned in."
![]()
ACC votes to add Louisville
Cardinal would become the 14th member, replacing Maryland.www.usatoday.com