Behind a paywall.
Behind a paywall.
I hate the reoccurring narrative that we "deemphasized football". We have great on-campus facilities, just hired an outstanding coach in Jim Mora, and have a 40,000 seat stadium. How is that deemphasizing football?
Pundits get paid to spew any thought that'll create clicks, sigh. I really don't get tied up in their opinions but draw the line and reply to said posts when they throw around inaccurate info/facts. Even that has become a part time job.I hate the reoccurring narrative that we "deemphasized football". We have great on-campus facilities, just hired an outstanding coach in Jim Mora, and have a 40,000 seat stadium. How is that deemphasizing football?
If the notion is that by leaving the American, an absolute s.hitshow of a conference, deemphasizes football, then would joining the big 12 reemphasize football?
Lazy journalists are lazy. They are easily manipulated. They have been manipulated into believing UConn gave up on football. They can become evangelists if fed the right information.I hate the reoccurring narrative that we "deemphasized football". We have great on-campus facilities, just hired an outstanding coach in Jim Mora, and have a 40,000 seat stadium. How is that deemphasizing football?
If the notion is that by leaving the American, an absolute s.hitshow of a conference, deemphasizes football, then would joining the big 12 reemphasize football?
So infuriating! Why is UConn joining the B12 "inconceivable" when KU is considered a premier B12 brand yet its demo is smaller than CT, has 3 MBB NCs in the past 30 years vs 5 for UConn and has been to the same number of BCS games as UConn during the same time period (despite being in a Power Conference for decades). Yormark sees the future. He's right; a dominant basketball league with very solid football, and new teams from larger markets is the only way to try to remain remotely competitive with the P2 (that said, I can't see a basketball only school in a small demo like the Zags, being part of the equation).
So infuriating! Why is UConn joining the B12 "inconceivable" when KU is considered a premier B12 brand yet its demo is smaller than CT, has 3 MBB NCs in the past 30 years vs 5 for UConn and has been to the same number of BCS games as UConn during the same time period (despite being in a Power Conference for decades). Yormark sees the future. He's right; a dominant basketball league with very solid football, and new teams from larger markets is the only way to try to remain remotely competitive with the P2 (that said, I can't see a basketball only school in a small demo like the Zags, being part of the equation).
And playing as an independent gave us flexibility in scheduling so that our home games were, at least theoretically a better product. It also put waste to the notion that "no one wants to come to Storrs." As we've seen plenty of good schools are interested in playing here.It is lazy journalism but the lazy part is in lack of imagination or vision. The conclusion many jumped to (even our then football head coach, who never got past it) was that by leaving a conference that played football for one that didn't play football we were giving up on the idea of being a football school.
They never took into account the economics of the second AAC media contract (which would have provided slightly more revenue to all other members while stripping us of the tier three revenue we were receiving on our own) or that we could build a quality schedule as an independent.
Blowing our own horn now would be a bad idea as whatever we accomplish on the football field will then be dissected and only the warts will be commented on as a means to diminish anything we may have done. We need to quietly demonstrate on the field, beginning this fall that we are on a path where we could be very competitive in a conference like the B-12.
"UConn has deemphasized football" is a continued lazy, lazy take that most sports journalists keep putting out there. Why? This take maybe made sense in the month after the Big East move, but so much has happened since then, and it's clear AD David Benedict is looking for a permanent solution. The team went to a bowl last year. Infuriating but not surprising
It is lazy journalism but the lazy part is in lack of imagination or vision. The conclusion many jumped to (even our then football head coach, who never got past it) was that by leaving a conference that played football for one that didn't play football we were giving up on the idea of being a football school.
They never took into account the economics of the second AAC media contract (which would have provided slightly more revenue to all other members while stripping us of the tier three revenue we were receiving on our own) or that we could build a quality schedule as an independent.
Blowing our own horn now would be a bad idea as whatever we accomplish on the football field will then be dissected and only the warts will be commented on as a means to diminish anything we may have done. We need to quietly demonstrate on the field, beginning this fall that we are on a path where we could be very competitive in a conference like the B-12.
In all candor the quality of our scheduling as an independent has been far better than I could have hoped for when it was announced that we were returning to the BE.And playing as an independent gave us flexibility in scheduling so that our home games were, at least theoretically a better product. It also put waste to the notion that "no one wants to come to Storrs." As we've seen plenty of good schools are interested in playing here.