I certainly hope so , but based on passed actions it seems the the B12 is rudderless. Its very hard to think strategically when your dodging the rocks.I wonder a bit if the Big 12 sudden public flirtation with us is their way of saying that there will consequences if you vote against our CCG plan. Those consequences being the loss of a desirable piece (Connecticut) and competition on the East coast. An attempt to change the cost/benefit analysis a bit to the favor there proposal makes sense but it may be a too Storrs-centric view.
The ACC isn't making a preemptive strike because they can't. Adding two schools (the most likely strike) in UConn and Cincy, for example, would increase the number of basketball schools to 17 (an awkward number) and increase the football conference to 16 to 2 eight-team divisions, meaning the conference would have to go 9 football games minimum (which is something they don't want to do). Adding a conference game would result in less ACC teams percentage-wise making a bowl, less home games on average per team, and would all but forever destroy the possibility (although already slim) of ND joining for football (as that would mean the conference would have to expand beyond 16).I certainly hope so , but based on passed actions it seems the the B12 is rudderless. Its very hard to think strategically when your dodging the rocks.
It seems to me the conference with the most to lose ( ACC)would have made a preemptive move by now.
Taking shizzle's response a bit further, the ACC's only possible preemptive strike would be adding Texas in a deal similar to what ND currently has.I certainly hope so , but based on passed actions it seems the the B12 is rudderless. Its very hard to think strategically when your dodging the rocks.
It seems to me the conference with the most to lose ( ACC)would have made a preemptive move by now.
I've often thought that could be Texas and the ACC's next move as it helps both, but Texas likes being king of its own so we'll see.Taking shizzle's response a bit further, the ACC's only possible preemptive strike would be adding Texas in a deal similar to what ND currently has.
If this were to happen, all roadblocks to the B-12 expanding would disappear.
This to me falls in key tweet category ..if different mod's can move it:
- Stewart Mandel @slmandel 10m10 minutes ago
For those hoping for Big 12 expansion ... Next week's NCAA convention just got very interesting.
12 retweets11 likes
Stewart Mandel @slmandel 17m17 minutes ago
John Swofford on conference title game deregulation: "A year ago I thought that would have passed easily. Now we'll have to see."
7 retweets1 like
Stewart Mandel @slmandel 24m24 minutes ago
Sankey: The SEC Big 12 prime time Sugar Bowl is important to them. "We will protect that." No talk of moving it so playoff not on NYE.
5 retweets3 likes
Stewart Mandel @slmandel 26m26 minutes ago
Sankey said there is an "openness" to explore options for Big 12 to host a title game with 10 teams, but they are happy with status quo.
5 retweets1 like
Stewart Mandel @slmandel 27m27 minutes ago
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey just said he will not support ACC/big 12 title game deregulation as originally proposed. Vote is next week.
Looks like they would get what they want until the ACC proposed putting up the 2 best teams for their championship game. That pissed the B1G and SEC off..now the B-12 may pay for the ACC's move.slmandel 1:36pm via Twitter for iPhone
Bob Bowlsby: "We do not want to add members or be forced to play two divisions." NCAA proposal vote next week
http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...-sec-greg-sankey-ncaa-rule-change-vote-011016
That's kind of my point...the Big12 essentially has AAC members playing Russian roulette right now. If you are USF/UCF, are you really willing to risk pushing out 2 of Houston, Cinci and UConn, backfilling with USM and UMASS and renegotiating the TV deal? There must be some hard math going on right now in several AD offices.
B1G, SEC, and Pac 12 have 80 votes between them...ACC and B-12 only have 48. Add the MAC's 12 votes because they are voting with he B1G and that's 92 votes against right off them top.
Here are the remaining conferences with number of votes:
AAC 12 votes
CUSA 13 votes (UAB is back in 2017 bringing them back to 14)
Mountain West 12 votes
Sunbelt 11 votes (Coastal Carolina will make 12 teams in 2017)
Independent's 3 (ND, BYU, UMass)
That makes 51 votes not committed (that we know of)....only 1 of those conferences has to vote with the BiG, SEC, Pac-12 and MAC to vote this down.
What public flirtation?I wonder a bit if the Big 12 sudden public flirtation with us is their way of saying that there will consequences if you vote against our CCG plan. Those consequences being the loss of a desirable piece (Connecticut) and competition on the East coast. An attempt to change the cost/benefit analysis a bit to the favor there proposal makes sense but it may be a too Storrs-centric view.
No g r e g. s w a I m. Is nonkey. He is full of sh.t.Is this a key tweet? If not I'll post in the other thread.
Matt Schonvisky @MattSchonvisky 3h3 hours ago
Full @GS interview discussing potential Big 12 expansion, looming CCG vote on 1/15 & how #UConn fits #BleedBlue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVJDX2zbTIs&feature=youtu.be…
http://ow.ly/WRZHu
slmandel 1:36pm via Twitter for iPhone
Bob Bowlsby: "We do not want to add members or be forced to play two divisions." NCAA proposal vote next week
http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...-sec-greg-sankey-ncaa-rule-change-vote-011016
That looks like a man who is making a ingenious PR move...he can then go back to his conference if motion is voted down and say..I tried everything possible to get it to pass...now we need to move forward. If for some reason he gets a compromise he has succeeded in what they wanted to do.Reached by phone Sunday morning, Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby said: “We continue to support full deregulation and believe conferences should have full prerogative on how they conduct competition. Having stated our first preference, I believe we can find a compromise that will work.”
Asked if that compromise could include two divisions, Bowlsby said: “We do not want to add members or be forced to play two divisions. Any compromise would have to consider those two provisions.”
Typical Big 12 media people suddenly speaking favorably aobut UConn, KState univ pres tweet about talking with Herbst, etc.What public flirtation?
Typical. Big 12 media people suddenly speaking favorably aobut UConn, KState univ pres tweet about talking with Herbst, etc.
What do mean by typical? I'm not drinking the phantom koolaid? I hope for something a little more solid than what we've seen so far.Typical. Big 12 media people suddenly speaking favorably aobut UConn, KState univ pres tweet about talking with Herbst, etc.
Ignore the period, it's a typo. I meant the normal/standard Big 12 media people.What do mean by typical? I'm not drinking the phantom koolaid? I hope for something a little more solid than what we've seen so far.
Jon Solomon @JonSolomonCBS 3h3 hours ago
Will NCAA vote this week force Big 12 to expand for conference championship game? http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...ce-big-12-to-expand-for-conference-title-game …
“There is a standard that’s been set, and there are four conferences among the five that meet that standard,” he said. “But there’s an openness to see if there’s an approach that works for the Big 12 in its current circumstance.”
Bowlsby said the Big 12 could go to two, five-team divisions as the Big Ten proposal would require. But the Big 12 wants to avoid that because its two best teams could be on one side of the division.
“What would have been the best matchup was already played within divisional play,” Bowlsby said of such a scenario. “I'm not convinced that a full round robin isn't the most viable and most reliable way to determine your champion.
Jon Solomon @JonSolomonCBS 3h3 hours ago
Will NCAA vote this week force Big 12 to expand for conference championship game? http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...ce-big-12-to-expand-for-conference-title-game …
....
“What would have been the best matchup was already played within divisional play,” Bowlsby said of such a scenario. “I'm not convinced that a full round robin isn't the most viable and most reliable way to determine your champion.