UConnDan97
predicting undefeated seasons since 1983
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2012
- Messages
- 12,957
- Reaction Score
- 53,107
Smart move by the AD. If the athletic department was in fact strong armed into Ollie, why would you go longer? This is a temp to perm situation. Is he being handed a bad bag of goods? Kinda. But that should be recognized, it will be relative. His leadership ability will be challenged as well as his X & O's. No one even knows how this guy looks/act/handles that bench during game time - that's a risk. Going 3-4 years is blind faith. Sure, it may ding recruiting a little, but not much. And if he really doesn't pass the sniff test out there owning that bench, you have to open this one up. I just don't think this program is in a place where it can take a 4 year rut and maintain momentum with it's brand out on the recruiting trail. This isn't a true blue blood that can transcend a stretch of anonymity, in particular in a league that's in dissaray. The kid is getting his chance, he needs to make the most of it. I'll be in his corner, but am not going to have blinders on if he feels sub par out there.
Frankly, though, it seems best if, when he retires, he retires. He's a figurehead whose ring every incoming coach needs to kiss, but then they move onto autonomy. I don't like this "in-between" phase. Ollie's the coach, or he's not.
(To be clear, they do need to respect him and his legacy.)
If Ollie turns out to be a great coach, he will be given a long term contract. If the recruits believe in him, all he needs to say is that he will be coach if he has a good season and that he will have a good season.
And then he doesn't have a good season and everyone bails!
If anyone can handle 1 year contracts it's Kevin Ollie. He had 13 1 year contracts in the NBA.
And the new coach who comes in is a big time recruiter and it gets fixed.
I suspect this is just Manuel asserting himself a bit and allowing the coaching hire to be his ultimate decision. If Ollie was immediately signed to a multi year permanent title deal now, it would be obvious that the hire was made by Calhoun and Calhoun only. This allows him to hire Ollie to keep continuity, let the retirement media/fan blitz pass, and either part way through the season or just after, assuming that it's not a complete disaster (even with the very low expectation of success this year) immediately hire him permanently and sign a multi-year extension.
I don't think the 1 year status is as big a deal as a lot of you. He is the new head coach and unless he gets fired recruits shouldn't expect anything different. When he walks into a recruits living room he is the new face of the program period
I can honestly care less about Warde Manuel's ego. IO'm more interested in UConn basketball.
Way too much bashing of Manuel going on here. If a guy with Jim Calhoun's personality was placed in Manuel's position, he'd be doing precisely what Manuel is doing. Manuel's making the right call. If KO has the team rolling in February and Manuel doesn't extend him for multiple years, then we have a discussion. But for now, this is the right call.

Recruit loves UConn and the Cuse during the year moving forward, Top 20? He thinks I know I like Hoppy and JB but love KO...........but if I need to make a decision I beter take the Cuse because I know one of those guys will be there but KO only has one year guaranteed........thanks but no thanks KO have to move on...........
yeah that works for a guy on the trails!!![]()
If I love KO, I wait to see what happens. The length of KO's contract right now is not a significant enough recruiting issue to merit locking ourselves into a long-term deal before we see KO's bona fides as a head coach.
My guess is that he'll be awesome as a head coach. But there's nothing worse than being stuck with a coach who ain't all that (hi PP!).
NEWSFLASH: UConn is going to lose a lot of games this year. It won't be pretty. They will be outtoughed, outrebounded.
What the hell does Manuel know about basketball anyway? Who is he consulting with? Digger Phelps?
Why do you assume Manuel will make a judgement based on W/L? Why wouldn't he judge based on how the team improves from November to February?
If he takes the former approach over the latter, hey, fire away...but it's a bit early for that, don't you think?
Like Manuel can judge that...
What's his expertise?
Don't overcomplicate it. It's not nuclear physics we're talking about. If you love sports, you'll have a general sense of whether a team is on the right track or not.
By that standard, Calhoun should have hung things up after the horrid 2010 season.
Any time a school gives a coach barely a shot at success, they create failure.