Unfortunately, I agree with this.What narrative seems more like 5 years from now?
1) Calhoun shoehorns his hand-picked, inexperienced choice into the job; nepotism backfires
2) Ollie is a coaching prodigy and despite minimal experience, excels at the job
It seems like there are a lot more ways for #1 to turn out to be correct.
If we're hiring the guy, gotta give him 3-4 years, no? He has to coach with some of his "own" players.i heard they're negotiating contract right now. ollie wants 3 years, manuel does not.
Frankly, though, it seems best if, when he retires, he retires. He's a figurehead whose ring every incoming coach needs to kiss, but then they move onto autonomy. I don't like this "in-between" phase. Ollie's the coach, or he's not.Ollie =calhoun stays apart of the program to mentor him... shaka like coach mean calhoun plays 18great holes ever other day
per uconnblog ollie will sign 1 year contract...If we're hiring the guy, gotta give him 3-4 years, no? He has to coach with some of his "own" players.
I don't love the move. Worse than the move, though, is not diving in and giving the guy a real chance. If you're going with Ollie, you don't merely stick your toes in the water.
Courant says Ollie's contract has language that is a middle ground between interim and permanent HC. what else is there?
per uconnblog ollie will sign 1 year contract...
That is unequivocally bad. What could he do this year to "succeed"? It's a down year.per uconnblog ollie will sign 1 year contract...