- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,283
- Reaction Score
- 35,125
A well reasoned opinion. I ultimately think you can hire him for a four year contract, and in year three push the eject button. But this makes as good a case for the opposite point of view as can be made.Smart move by the AD. If the athletic department was in fact strong armed into Ollie, why would you go longer? This is a temp to perm situation. Is he being handed a bad bag of goods? Kinda. But that should be recognized, it will be relative. His leadership ability will be challenged as well as his X & O's. No one even knows how this guy looks/act/handles that bench during game time - that's a risk. Going 3-4 years is blind faith. Sure, it may ding recruiting a little, but not much. And if he really doesn't pass the sniff test out there owning that bench, you have to open this one up. I just don't think this program is in a place where it can take a 4 year rut and maintain momentum with it's brand out on the recruiting trail. This isn't a true blue blood that can transcend a stretch of anonymity, in particular in a league that's in dissaray. The kid is getting his chance, he needs to make the most of it. I'll be in his corner, but am not going to have blinders on if he feels sub par out there.
One thing, though. Arizona, Ohio State, and a couple of other schools with less history were able to absorb a period of sucking. I don't want that, and it can't be prolonged, but three titles is more than all but UCLA, Kentucky, UNC, Indiana, and Duke. They can get a coach to come here.