Waquoit
Mr. Positive
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 33,634
- Reaction Score
- 88,520
1. JC knows more about basketball than Manuel.
2. He thinks Ollie is the man.
So what? JC has said he's "often wrong but never in doubt".
1. JC knows more about basketball than Manuel.
2. He thinks Ollie is the man.
So what? JC has said he's "often wrong but never in doubt".
If you've been following the coverage of him today and in recent weeks, there aren't too many people (who actually know him) who don't think the guy has what it takes.
Believe me, I've been reading the coverage. It was the work of a master.
Believe me, I've been reading the coverage. It was the work of a master.
So what? JC has said he's "often wrong but never in doubt".
Forget it, these pinheads will NEVER get it. They think we should give a coach with zero head coaching experience a 4 year deal. What can you say to that? They live in dream world where the 1990 team had higher rated recruits and that this team is so devoid of talent it has no chance to succeed and, therfore, Ollie has no chance to succeed. I hope to god no players from our team or potential recruits are reading this crap. The 1990 team had decent talent and great team chemistry which, in part, was created by the coaching staff. Calhoun himself had to change his coaching approach as he got more talented teams but Calhoun circa 1990 absolutely could have won a ton of games with this collection of kids. We have a top 10 recruit surrounded by lots of other Top 100 and Top 50 recruits. We had great teams with the likes of Travis Knight as our center. Rod Sellers was 6'9" tall, had a bad knee and wasn't super talented. What were Chris Smith and Tate George rated coming out of high school?
I don't think anyone could coach this collection of players to a national championship but could a good coach win a lot of games with them? ABSOLUTELY! But because these whining cry babies didn't get their way, they feel like it is their duty to trash the team, trash the AD, trash the university president and make assumptions about the AD's confidence in the new coach. If any recruit is reading this board, THESE PINHEADS are doing more damage to our recruiting than a one year contract is. And we don't even know what Manuel or Herbst are saying to recruits. They could be telling them that they assume Ollie will do a great job and that their plan is to extend his contract to a long term one once he proves that they are right. They could be telling them that this is why he is not being termed as an interim coach.
Personally, I think this team will have a very good year. I honestly have no idea how good of a coach Ollie will be. He could be mediocre or he could be great. I hope he is great and, if he is, this team will surprise a lot of people. And he recruited a lot of these kids. He is not a stranger coming in so there is little chance of mutiny or resistance. They will rally around him. To say Ollie is being set up for failure is sour grapes to the point of being assinine. The decision has been made and the team will make the best of it. So why don't you guys shut the duck up and move the duck on already. This program needs positive energy and support, not this crap. I would be willing to bet that Ollie himself would tell you guys the same exact thing if he read what you are all writing.
Numerous articles from several different websites in the last two days bashing Calhoun, but yet in your dream world he's such a media darling that he can convince writers to universally shower Kevin Ollie with undeserved praise.
Just so we are clear on the record here: You are betting against Kevin Ollie's success as our next head coach, correct?That's the work of a master. He has people believing that all this praise is just spontaneous.
I'm not your buddy, pal.
I'm not calling for her retirement at all. I'm just saying that she hasn't done anything to earn my trust yet. Going forward, I'm hoping that she will.
1. JC knows more about basketball than Manuel.
2. He thinks Ollie is the man.
3. Making Hobbs the interim coach would go over like a lead balloon with the people you don't want to piss off.
4. Ollie has backers all over the USA who have seen what his advice, mentoring, impact on teaching the game to younger players, has brought over a span of 13 years in the NBA. You diminish that time he put in. People are making out as though this guy rolled off a beach chair and became a college coach 2 years ago, when one could easily argue that 13 years in the NBA on the back of your knowledge of the game (certainly not your athletic prowess) trumps sitting on the bench for more years. Billy Donovan, for instance, had 2 years at Marshall before taking the helm at Florida. Why do those two years (no tournaments, no conference championships, middling to bad record) trump 13 years being a heady player in the NBA?
I've only said this a number of times. The school is signalling to recruits that the coach is not supported and that they are not convinced he is good enough to coach.
Considering that I graduated from UConn 3 years ago, I'm obviously interested and care about the university as a whole. Please don't question my allegiance.I'm not your pal, friend.
Spoken like a UConn sports fan and not a fan of the university. If you actually read up on what she's done (that is, if you actually care about UConn) then she most definitely should have earned your trust by now.
Said Tyler Olander: "He's very much like Coach Calhoun. Their methods of getting their points across are just different. Coach Ollie is probably the most positive person I've ever met, and he's helped me with all aspects of life, in school, my personal life and especially on the court. He's always pushing everybody to go that much further and get that much better. … Nothing could knock him down that he won't get up from."
Dean smith thought bill gutheridge was the man. Just saying. I love KO, had classes with KO and was one of the few other Californians at UCONN when KO was there. I couldn't be more solidly in his camp but I think warde made the right call with the 1 year contract
Just so we are clear on the record here: You are betting against Kevin Ollie's success as our next head coach, correct?
Believe me, I've been reading the coverage. It was the work of a master.
I inferred that because you have been so consistently negative about anything that hints of JC's control, always assuming that he has the least noble and most insidious of intentions. You consistently fault those who support Calhoun as blind followers. Your view seems to overlook that most of us are simply fans who appreciate that Calhoun, while certainly imperfect, may just have a method to his madness, and it may not be as selfish as you think. You have stated repeatedly that this was JC's selfish, egotistical power play to ensure his death grip on the program and thus his legacy by keeping it in the family. I'll agree that that is one possible read of the situation; but I'll also admit readily that neither I nor any of us mutton heads who post here really know the truth. I remained somewhat skeptical about Kevin's ability to take over, despite all the glowing reviews from pretty much everyone who has ever encountered the man, because I needed to see it for myself. Now I have, and I am sold. I am going on record and saying I believe in this kid and I now believe that Calhoun made this power play not because he wanted to retain control over the program, but because he genuinely feels that Kevin is special and has a better ability and chance to succeed here than any other realistic option. You are saying let's wait and see the results. That's certainly your prerogative, and there are many who feel the same as you, including Warde Manuel. I think there is a huge difference between having the conviction to say you believe versus being a Doubting Thomas. And I believe that the success of our program is in large part attributable to people who took the former route, rather than the latter.Where did you get that from? He's the coach of my favorite team in any sport, the team where W and L's get to me more than any other. Ollie's my guy now. I've been talking about the process here and those that think that JC didn't choreograph the whole thing starting from way back are nuts. And speaking of nuts, I think it's more important for the program overall that the new AD is left with his nuts on than to worry about what a couple of teenagers think.
I inferred that because you have been so consistently negative about anything that hints of JC's control, always assuming that he has the least noble and most insidious of intentions. You consistently fault those who support Calhoun as blind followers. Your view seems to overlook that most of us are simply fans who appreciate that Calhoun, while certainly imperfect, may just have a method to his madness, and it may not be as selfish as you think. You have stated repeatedly that this was JC's selfish, egotistical power play to ensure his death grip on the program and thus his legacy by keeping it in the family. I'll agree that that is one possible read of the situation; but I'll also admit readily that neither I nor any of us mutton heads who post here really know the truth. I remained somewhat skeptical about Kevin's ability to take over, despite all the glowing reviews from pretty much everyone who has ever encountered the man, because I needed to see it for myself. Now I have, and I am sold. I am going on record and saying I believe in this kid and I now believe that Calhoun made this power play not because he wanted to retain control over the program, but because he genuinely feels that Kevin is special and has a better ability and chance to succeed here than any other realistic option. You are saying let's wait and see the results. That's certainly your prerogative, and there are many who feel the same as you, including Warde Manuel. I think there is a huge difference between having the conviction to say you believe versus being a Doubting Thomas. And I believe that the success of our program is in large part attributable to people who took the former route, rather than the latter.
I don't get this line "I think there is a huge difference between having the conviction to say you believe versus being a Doubting Thomas." JC isn't god and blind faith is no way to run a program.
I think this is pretty fair assessment of my attitude except for the way you go to extremes. I don't get this line "I think there is a huge difference between having the conviction to say you believe versus being a Doubting Thomas." JC isn't god and blind faith is no way to run a program. I will say my instincts concerning the BB program have been correct for over 30 years. I was touting JC for the head coaching job on the Boneyard of it's day (WTIC sportstalk) before Northeastern was on the schedule. Once he got here, I knew early he was the right guy. I was quoted in the Courant saying as much. I knew it when it was time to leave and said so while most folks were saying he would be here 2 more years. And now I'm saying that JC put the AD on the spot and the AD came through it as well as anyone could have. That doesn't mean I'm anti-Ollie. No one will be happier than me if KO is a huge success. UConn basketball is my team.
Chip? Is that you?The point of all this is that we will be fine whether Ollie succeeds or he fails, whether he stays long term or doesn't and, if he doesn't, whether his successor is successful or not. I think this program is on solid enough footing to survive even two shaky regimes. People need to relax and stop being so upset by the whole one year deal thing and how it will affect recruiting this year. We will be fine.
Considering that I graduated from UConn 3 years ago, I'm obviously interested and care about the university as a whole. Please don't question my allegiance.