- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 34,004
- Reaction Score
- 99,213
You know something? Would be huge.Ours to lose.
You know something? Would be huge.Ours to lose.
Pour another one and go read the thread on the Cuse board. It's worth it.I saw this thread while I was running errands this afternoon and excitedly leafed through the first few pages. Then I thought, no, slow down. Really savor this one.
A few hours later, here I sit - comfortable couch, glass of scotch, afternoon sun dancing on each wonderful page. This is how Cuse misfortune is meant to be read.
Cal not buying that.Ours to lose.
Cal not buying that.
Who has?Cal hasn't contacted him
I stand corrected. Thought Kentucky was on Richmond's short list.BTW.--Happy to be wrong.Cal hasn't contacted him
Richmond to Virginia equally classic. .Still not preferred.Richmond to Richmond would be classic.
Nobody who should scare us
I have no idea why he did not get more time at Syracuse.
Zero interest in 99% of the kids who transfer and think most of you are nuts for wanting any of them, but this one, though, I think is a no-brainer.
54 pages. Just drink the whole bottle straight.Pour another one and go read the thread on the Cuse board. It's worth it.
Nobody who should scare us
You stockpile talent where you can but many posters have this idea that the staff will add like 3 transfer players plus have the seniors return, that’s not going to happen. Hurley has said they won’t become Transfer U and I’d be pretty surprised if he carries more than 13 guys. Im all for adding talent, if you can add a guy like Richmond, great let’s do it. It’s a balancing act is all and have to keep in mind developing your young guys too otherwise they’ll go find somewhere else to get better.I think we'll be very good because our defense will be elite but agree we play this weird game where posters pretend we have too much talent for players to be added. Jackson and Sanogo have tons of talent but they are both developing.
Soms posters are saying we have too much depth/good players and we need to carry less players than the normal scholarship limit, this is after 7 years of having an undermanned team. I'll never understand this place.
Everyone on the board wants us to be great but some don't seem to want us to recruit and stockpile talent like the great teams do.
I'm calling the Cops on you for that one.If he transferred to WVU he'd be the Kadary in the coal mine
(ducks)
Kadary is better than both Cole and Gaff. The problem is you have to get rid of one of them for Kadary to want to come here.
We will have Gaff, Cole, and Diggins as point guards for next year. That's a lot of guys for one spot.
Kadary will be a starter at his next stop. He won't be coming to UCONN to sit behind lesser talent like Cole. He already did that at Syracuse.
#ReturnOfDaggerTreyTy
Kadary is 6’5. He can play 1-3. He’d be taking a combination of Bouk, Polley, and Adams minutesKadary is better than both Cole and Gaff. The problem is you have to get rid of one of them for Kadary to want to come here.
We will have Gaff, Cole, and Diggins as point guards for next year. That's a lot of guys for one spot.
Kadary will be a starter at his next stop. He won't be coming to UCONN to sit behind lesser talent like Cole. He already did that at Syracuse.
#ReturnOfDaggerTreyTy
So we’re too deep at the one to add a player who’d immediately be our best one? Kadary isn’t sitting behind anybody on this team. He doesn’t have to worry about thatAs much as it would be nice to have him cuz he would be great and as much as it would be fun to stick to the orange, he’s not coming. Too deep at the 1
He’s not a PG only in college. He was a SF out of high school. He’s basically a point forward but you can easily play him as a 1, 2, or 3...and even a small ball 4 in a pinch. Don’t get too caught up with positions.As much as it would be nice to have him cuz he would be great and as much as it would be fun to stick to the orange, he’s not coming. Too deep at the 1