- Joined
- Sep 16, 2011
- Messages
- 56,243
- Reaction Score
- 213,944
Based off of him being a better basketball player than them.And that statement is just based off of his stats?
Based off of him being a better basketball player than them.And that statement is just based off of his stats?
Because he's a lot better than Sid and Polley and can play both positions better than them.
So I take it you were the only poster who was critical when Sid came to UConn. However I don't recall your reservations of his skills in posts on the Boneyard. Did I miss your reservations of Brendan as well?Based off of him being a better basketball player than them.
What are you talking about? I watched Sid play all season.So I take it you were the only poster who was critical when Sid came to UConn. However I don't recall your reservations of his skills in posts on the Boneyard. Did I miss your reservations of Brendan as well?
I'm o.k. landing him if someone is leaving the program and we're adding someone with immediate eligibility as well. If we go into next year with 11 scholarship players, two of which for whatever reason the coach didn't want to play this year, that's not enough depth to succeed.
Based off of him being a better basketball player than them.

A few weeks ago you probably never heard of him... now based off of Andre Lafleur's comments you can confidently state as a fact that he is better than Sid and Polley?... Come on
Hurley has said Sid has the highest ceiling and aside from Jalen Adams has the best chance of going pro. Sid is much more athletic than Ntambwe. If Sid can get stronger and improve his shot (both very doable) than it would be very hard for Ntambwe to come in and take Sid's minutes.
A few weeks ago you probably never heard of him... now based off of Andre Lafleur's comments you can confidently state as a fact that he is better than Sid and Polley?... Come on
Hurley has said Sid has the highest ceiling and aside from Jalen Adams has the best chance of going pro. Sid is much more athletic than Ntambwe. If Sid can get stronger and improve his shot (both very doable) than it would be very hard for Ntambwe to come in and take Sid's minutes.
Jeezus, this place gets dumber by the day.A few weeks ago you probably never heard of him... now based off of Andre Lafleur's comments you can confidently state as a fact that he is better than Sid and Polley?... Come on
Hurley has said Sid has the highest ceiling and aside from Jalen Adams has the best chance of going pro. Sid is much more athletic than Ntambwe. If Sid can get stronger and improve his shot (both very doable) than it would be very hard for Ntambwe to come in and take Sid's minutes.
Ntambwe was better than Wilson at scoring, shooting, and rebounding this year while being more efficient on a far worse UNLV team.A few weeks ago you probably never heard of him... now based off of Andre Lafleur's comments you can confidently state as a fact that he is better than Sid and Polley?... Come on
Hurley has said Sid has the highest ceiling and aside from Jalen Adams has the best chance of going pro. Sid is much more athletic than Ntambwe. If Sid can get stronger and improve his shot (both very doable) than it would be very hard for Ntambwe to come in and take Sid's minutes.
Ntambwe may be the better player. I just don't accept proclamations as absolutes. Anyone watching sports long enough understands there is an uncertainty to trajectories of players and their development. Furthermore we don't know if he can play well in Hurley's system or with the complement of players at UConn and their skillsets compared to the players at UNLV. In addition we've witnessed the difficulties players have getting back to their skill sets when they miss a season.What are you talking about? I watched Sid play all season.
Sid is more athletic than Joel; that's the only area where he has him beat.
Sid struggled to get significant minutes on this team this year, so I wouldn't count on him getting a starter's role unless he significantly improves this offseason.
Ntambwe is absolutely a better basketball player than them right now, it's not debatable. Will he always be a better player than them, no. Players can have different trajectories but right now Ntambwe is a better basketball player than them.Sid definitely has his weaknesses (strength, shooting), but he has a ton of upside as well. Tremendous athlete, with good shooting form. He has decent handle for his size but certainly needs to make it tighter.
I also like what Polley brings with his shooting and length. Polley showed he can score in bunches and spread the floor.
My main point is Ntambwe would likely be a great addition but to state as a fact that he is better than both Polley and Sid already (see @superjohn) is ridiculous. I know @superjohn posts his opinions as facts and at times when he is questioned he gets defensive and doesn't bother to back it up, but his posts are getting more ridiculous. He used to be a solid poster.
Doubling and tripling down on this take huh?Ntambwe may be the better player. I just don't accept proclamations as absolutes. Anyone watching sports long enough understands there is an uncertainty to trajectories of players and their development. Furthermore we don't know if he can play well in Hurley's system or with the complement of players at UConn and their skillsets compared to the players at UNLV. In addition we've witnessed the difficulties players have getting back to their skill sets when they miss a season.
You have an incredible athlete in Sidney who, if he develops a shot and improves further on defense (he made considerable progress over the season), will be a stud player. I'm not ready to proclaim his development or Polley's for that matter, so inadequate that Ntambwe is a must get especially considering there are more pressing needs to fill. And that is before knowing what Akok can contribute instead of Ntambwe.
And yes I'm aware of your statements about potential openings next season. IMO we absolutely need one stud pg next season and a third decent option if Gaffney is more of a 2g. We absolutely need a very good 5 and not a body at that position, plus a body at that position unless Akok can fill that role.

Ntambwe was better than Wilson at scoring, shooting, and rebounding this year while being more efficient on a far worse UNLV team.
Wilson has a lot of upside and I believe in him, but Ntambwe is flat out better than him right now. It would be Wilson who would have to take Ntambwe’s minutes if they were on the same team. Not only that, the two could definitely play simultaneously so it’s not even an issue to begin with.
There are 80 minutes per game to distribute between the 2 forward spots. Plenty of time for Akok, Ntambwe, Wilson, and Polley to all play significant roles.
The front court has had zero depth and we’ve been terrible the last few years in large part because of it. Ntambwe would be huge.
I can't project scenarios with the same certainty as some of the posters in this forum. I can tell you one scenario that would happen with as close to certainty I'm willing to make. Should UConn get Ntambwe and he or the future team prove to be a bust, the posters who are currently certain he is absolutely an important get will not admit they could be wrong. Instead it will be Hurley's fault.Sid definitely has his weaknesses (strength, shooting), but he has a ton of upside as well. Tremendous athlete, with good shooting form. He has decent handle for his size but certainly needs to make it tighter.
I also like what Polley brings with his shooting and length. Polley showed he can score in bunches and spread the floor.
My main point is Ntambwe would likely be a great addition but to state as a fact that he is better than both Polley and Sid already (see @superjohn) is ridiculous. I know @superjohn posts his opinions as facts and at times when he is questioned he gets defensive and doesn't bother to back it up, but his posts are getting more ridiculous. He used to be a solid poster.
Do you recall the final game of this season?Doubling and tripling down on this take huh?
When Jalen signed with UConn I thought he would be a NBA player before his senior year. I didn't think Ollie would destroy our program after winning the title. I thought Sid would have a more productive freshman year. What does any of that have to do with Ntambwe being a better basketball player right now than both Sid and Polley?I can't project scenarios with the same certainty as some of the posters in this forum. I can tell you one scenario that would happen with as close to certainty I'm willing to make. Should UConn get Ntambwe and he or the future team prove to be a bust, the posters who are currently certain he is absolutely an important get will not admit they could be wrong. Instead it will be Hurley's fault.
This is why I challenged superjohn to show me what statements he made about Sid when Sid announced he was leaving St. Johns to come to UConn. You, kansashusky and I are not arguing against Ntambwe. We are taking to task the certainty some posters have about reading the future,
I assume you're talking about a good Sid Wilson game. Which has nothing to do with the fact that people are basing Ntambwe being better on actual stats and not just to be different and argumentativeDo you recall the final game of this season?
Why is right now relevant? If Ntambwe came here, he most likely wouldn't compete with Sid for minutes until Sid is a Junior.
My view on Ntambwe changes depending on when he can play. I still think he's a useful guy in our system, just less so as a 2020-21 player.
Show me who is arguing against this. The three of us who are challenging superjohn are not challenging which of the two players are better currently. We are challenging the certainty of which player will be better in two years. It's unknown in our opinion. And two of us are making a point that with the uncertainty of that two year window, and with the needs of this team, scholarships might best be made elsewhere.Only an idiot thinks Ntambwe is not a much better basketball player than Sid. Sid is a superb athlete and nothing else. His shot is shockingly awful. The athleticism alone gives him pro potential. But he has A LOT to work on.
PTS 4.6 vs 11.8
FG% 34.9% vs 40.1%
3PT% 22.9% vs 38.6%
Reb 2.7 vs 5.5
AST 0.3 vs 0.6
STL 0.3 0.5
BLK 0.8 0.4
TOs/40 1.9 vs 2.0
ORtg 85.8 vs 113.0
DRtg 105.1 vs 104.8
OWS -0.2 vs 1.8
DWS 0.5 vs 0.9
Ntambwe is the better player in practically every way measurable.
Only three guys on our roster averaged more points - all of them were guards and one graduated this year and another is graduating this coming year.
He'd be the third best rebounder on our team right now, too.
And he's a freshman.
First of all you're lumping me in with two other posters who are making a similar argument. Second of all, if you read my post, I'm concurring he might be the better player even as I'm making arguments that put asterisks for future development. My position is I can't be certain that Ntambwe will be the better player in two years?I assume you're talking about a good Sid Wilson game. Which has nothing to do with the fact that people are basing Ntambwe being better on actual stats and not just to be different and argumentative