- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,332
- Reaction Score
- 1,832
He's gonna take the job and then sabotage the program.. Destroy them all JC!
How do you sabotage a program that is already in the "Utterly Sucks" category?
He's gonna take the job and then sabotage the program.. Destroy them all JC!
This is all nonsense. BC is interested in Ammaker.
I just don't think they have any chance. By almost every metric, except TV contract, Harvard is a much better job for Amaker. If I am him, I am waiting for Duke or Stanford to open up.
Yeah, but is BC interested in him?
I'm sort of surprised to learn of JC's apparently strong interest in the opening at BC.
Yawkey Way said:No. For a host of reasons, BC will not be hiring Jim Calhoun. Even if BC fans that might set aside their dislike for him and agree he's a fine Coach and might be ok with his consideration for the position, its not going to happen, imo. BC rejected Jim Calhoun's interest in Coaching at BC years ago and will do so again. BC will not allow 0-10 % grad rates in its athletic programs. It just won't.. and no matter how many wins you can get for the school, BC won't even consider such a Coach. .I'm sort of surprised to learn of JC's apparently strong interest in the opening at BC, but the good news here for Uconn fans is that their worst fears on this appear to me to have little to no chance of ever happening.
No. For a host of reasons, BC will not be hiring Jim Calhoun. Even if BC fans that might set aside their dislike for him and agree he's a fine Coach and might be ok with his consideration for the position, its not going to happen, imo. BC rejected Jim Calhoun's interest in Coaching at BC years ago and will do so again. BC will not allow 0-10 % grad rates in its athletic programs. It just won't.. and no matter how many wins you can get for the school, BC won't even consider such a Coach. .I'm sort of surprised to learn of JC's apparently strong interest in the opening at BC, but the good news here for Uconn fans is that their worst fears on this appear to me to have little to no chance of ever happening.
WestHartHusk - I am curious as to what those metrics would be that you referenced above. Not trying to be a smarta* , I am just curious.
I love how you called it "apparently strong interest" despite 6 pages of beat writers, donors, and Calhoun himself refuting it.
No. For a host of reasons, BC will not be hiring Jim Calhoun. Even if BC fans that might set aside their dislike for him and agree he's a fine Coach and might be ok with his consideration for the position, its not going to happen, imo. BC rejected Jim Calhoun's interest in Coaching at BC years ago and will do so again. BC will not allow 0-10 % grad rates in its athletic programs. It just won't.. and no matter how many wins you can get for the school, BC won't even consider such a Coach. .I'm sort of surprised to learn of JC's apparently strong interest in the opening at BC, but the good news here for Uconn fans is that their worst fears on this appear to me to have little to no chance of ever happening.
No. For a host of reasons, BC will not be hiring Jim Calhoun. Even if BC fans that might set aside their dislike for him and agree he's a fine Coach and might be ok with his consideration for the position, its not going to happen, imo. BC rejected Jim Calhoun's interest in Coaching at BC years ago and will do so again. BC will not allow 0-10 % grad rates in its athletic programs. It just won't.. and no matter how many wins you can get for the school, BC won't even consider such a Coach. .I'm sort of surprised to learn of JC's apparently strong interest in the opening at BC, but the good news here for Uconn fans is that their worst fears on this appear to me to have little to no chance of ever happening.
BC rejected Jim Calhoun's interest in Coaching at BC years ago and will do so again.
Why hasn't Calhoun come out with a statement denying it yet? It's all over Espn
Gary Parrish wins the internet for today:
Gary ParrishVerified account @GaryParrishCBS
@GoodmanESPN Hey man. I’ve got Lou Carnesecca’s number if you want to call and see if he’s interested in an ACC job. Say the word.
You are a good poster (I think)...didn't have to add "not trying to be a smart* . And though I am generally first in line to bash BC, I also don't mean any of the below as a smarta* and my opinion can be wrong. That said...
The reason I give the tilt to Harvard is because I think if Amaker took the BC job it is with other jobs in mind later. And if that is the prism, then he is much better off staying put because: 1) Harvard is positioned within the league to consistently get into the tournament; 2) they have a unique sales pitch that won't work with all kids, but should get them 3 solid players every year; and 3) he pretty much as the job as long as he wants it; and 4) I don't think there are any "additional" jobs that will open up to him for being successful at BC that won't open based on his success at Harvard. In contrasts, 1) BC has a significant uphill battle for years to come to gain traction in a league ripe with "brands" if not talent; 2) I am not sure how BC can differentiate itself right now regarding recruiting (facilities and support are sub-par relative to their league and regional competition; and 3) I think if he struggles for 4 years he will be out of a job whereas he is absolutely safe at Harvard for four years regardless.
Just my two cents...
FWIW Goodman works for ESPN, not Yahoo Sports, and he went to Arizona, not Syracuse. But I do think Goodman got bad information.Yahoo does this around tourney time every year to drive views up. Goodman is a a Cuse
I only quoted the " apparent strong interest "as this is what ESPN writer was reporting. I also debunked the ESPN reporting as highly dubious in its validity. I see BC having little to no interest in hiring Jim Calhoun as their next Coach, nor believe for a nano second that Jim Calhoun as any " serious interest " in pursuing the opening there. It just demonstrates once again how what we read in the so called mainstream press out of Connecticut, that then goes national, can have no basis in truth whatsoever, sometimes.I love how you called it "apparently strong interest" despite 6 pages of beat writers, donors, and Calhoun himself refuting it.