Javonte Brown-Ferguson Reclass?

[intlzncster]

That's awesome...thx...does it work with all paywall news sites?

More hit than miss... doesn’t work for WSJ for example.

The ctl c move sometimes works for things like the NY times, where cancel loading doesn't. No clue about WSJ

 

[mauconnfan]

Chief has ruined the board for me. I don't know when the turn happened, but there are definitely way more people egging him on now than there were a year or two ago.

I love basketball. I love UConn. Those are the things I want to talk about. Chief derails every thread he's in. He is an awful poster.

"Ignore"

 

[intlzncster]

Kansas is also talking about redshirting Mitch Lightfoot this year. Due to the facT they have so much depth upfront this year. If they do that it cant hurt our chances with Javonte Brown Ferguson. That would be another big to be behind.

This would be ideal. Hurley should por that possibility in his head.

 

[CL82]

Aaaaaaand you just accomplished the same damn thing. Doubly ironic

So your post would be...
#triplelyironic?

 

[intlzncster]

So your post would be...
#triplelyironic?

If it results in 10+ more posts about Chief, yes.

Edit: Actually no, I wasn't complaining about anything.

 

[2Infinity]

Anyone else secretly amused how the Chaters turn a single @Chief00 post into 10+ posts about him? It would be hysterical but for the fact that it craps up every thread with people stumbling over each other to be the first to say how much Chief's posts don't matter to them.

#unintentionallyironic

You are soo right!! It's amusing, though so predictable, and reading their responses as they reflexively pop up in each thread, gets tiring. The players are so predictable too in what they say. It's almost like their own little club where a race ensues to see who will be first to rebut or challenge Chief. The funniest part is that it all happens under the banner of "we don't care about him"! Oh really?!?

This ++
The Chief clutter (”Andre 2012”, “Blaze”, “Dams”, “Grind”, “Bunky”, “Sunny day”, etc..) plus Fan Club clutter seem to far outweigh so called Chaters.
Chief seems to follow the philosophy of “If I repeat it enough it will become true”. And he often drops those in threads out of the blue which adds nothing to the conversation and invites a response from a “Chater”.
It’s funny how the Fan Club seems to immediately chime in response to a criticism of Chief. If anyone’s obsessed it’s them. Or maybe those are Chief burner accounts. (Hmmm. I wonder? Burner account for a third person account - strange days indeed).
The Chaters constantly see the clutter, chime in, and the dude thinks he’s in their heads.

Actually the support for Chief really started when the Chaters routinely began chiming in on virtually every Chief post. They still don't outweigh the Chaters in volume of comments, though possibly so in Likes. As someone else here said, if you don't want threads derailed, just put him on ignore. You'll keep your blood pressure in check, but I don't think the Chaters really want to, because they don't want to miss anything he says, or the opportunity to....chime in! lol

 

[CL82]

If it results in 10+ more posts about Chief, yes.

Well it's already three four just counting the two of us so it's well on its way.

 

[444JR]

You are soo right!! It's amusing, though so predictable, and reading their responses as they reflexively pop up in each thread, gets tiring. The players are so predictable too in what they say. It's almost like their own little club where a race ensues to see who will be first to rebut or challenge Chief. The funniest part is that it all happens under the banner of "we don't care about him"! Oh really?!?

Actually the support for Chief really started when the Chaters routinely began chiming in on virtually every Chief post. They still don't outweigh the Chaters in volume of comments, though possibly so in Likes. As someone else here said, if you don't want threads derailed, just put him on ignore. You'll keep your blood pressure in check, but I don't think the Chaters really want to, because they don't want to miss anything he says, or the opportunity to....chime in! lol

Well it's already three four just counting the two of us so it's well on it's way.

2Infinity's post should count for two! I wish I could like it twice!

 

[uconngb]

Few things more reliable than the Chief conform after the public reporting and acknowledgment by the recruit himself.

You can take that to to bank!

 

[uconngb]

I'm not a Chief hater, but care to update us on your prediction that we'd get another commitment by 10/15? That seemed to me to be about Cardwell, but that was only an assumption. Has the timeline changed? I'm legitimately asking, and not criticizing because it hasn't happened.

Did he say October 15, 2019?? C'mon, you gotta know Chief better than that. Goalposts always movin......the secret to Chiefin

 

[Shine33]

@Chief00 is the real deal. I noticed he said nothing in the Cardwell thread to indicate he was on campus. Same with @Zionn Other posters on the other hand, were exposed. I won’t name them, but it’s nice to know what info i can trust, and in Chief I trust.

 

[MattMang23]

Chief never used to be so popular. He was one of the crowd. It seems like I took about a year or 18 months off from posting regularly and when I returned, Chief was this legendary persona. Where did this come from?

 

[UCDaveD]

Chief haters = Frank Grimes

 

[CL82]

Chief never used to be so popular. He was one of the crowd. It seems like I took about a year or 18 months off from posting regularly and when I returned, Chief was this legendary persona. Where did this come from?

The Chaters. Now every Chief post is highlighted and talked about it, when it used to be, as you point out, just another comment.

 

[WhereistheDove?]

Chief never used to be so popular. He was one of the crowd. It seems like I took about a year or 18 months off from posting regularly and when I returned, Chief was this legendary persona. Where did this come from?

The depths of hell...

 

[krinklecut]

Thanks to @tcf15 this works like a charm. When you click on the link, right after the article loads click the X in the browser that stops it from loading. That will get rid of the paywall

While this only works sometimes, turning off Javascript will get you around every paywall. Click the lock next to the url, go to site settings, scroll to javascript and block it. Reload the page and voila.

 

[3rdbass]

Chief never used to be so popular. He was one of the crowd. It seems like I took about a year or 18 months off from posting regularly and when I returned, Chief was this legendary persona. Where did this come from?

Partying with Dre.

 

[krinklecut]

@Chief00 is the real deal. I noticed he said nothing in the Cardwell thread to indicate he was on campus. Same with @Zionn Other posters on the other hand, were exposed. I won’t name them, but it’s nice to know what info i can trust, and in Chief I trust.

I also said nothing about him being on campus. Am I real deal insider now too? Didn't know I could achieve that from my cubicle.

 

[2north]

@Chief00 is the real deal. I noticed he said nothing in the Cardwell thread to indicate he was on campus. Same with @Zionn Other posters on the other hand, were exposed. I won’t name them, but it’s nice to know what info i can trust, and in Chief I trust.

I find his schtick more comic relief than anything. I mean, posting a pic of AJ at Blaze 2 days after he was there and being vague enough about when it was taken is pure gold.

 

[2north]

Also ignoring only works if you also ignore everyone else that replies, which is the entire board!

 

[CL82]

Also ignoring only works if you also ignore everyone else that replies, which is the entire board!

Nope, if you ignore someone, his text won't show up in other posts.

 

[NJHusky]

More hit than miss... doesn’t work for WSJ for example.

Any idea how it is able to bypass the paywall? Do they have site approval?

 

[2north]

Nope, if you ignore someone, his text won't show up in other posts.

But the reply will so it’s still clutter.

 

[CL82]

But the reply will so it’s still clutter.

So the most efficient answer is just to stop the chating posts?

 

[Chief00]

40 posts about Chief since my last post in this thread, but it’s Chief cluttering up the board. Let that logic sink in.

 

[HuskyHawk]

Muscadin committed to Kansas. Does Javonte Brown Ferguson believe Self's statement that he needs 2 big men or does Javonte Brown Ferguson want to be the only big in UConn's class? Objectively, the UConn situation seems more enticing with Carlton being a Junior.

Kansas has the Muscadin commit and David McCormack, a top 40 guy, who is a sophomore.

KU is overloaded at guard. Azubuike and Lightfoot are graduating and DeSousa is a constant eligibility risk. What they need is a power forward, not so much a 7 footer. McCormick would probably play the 4, but Javonte Brown Ferguson would certainly by fighting for time with Muscadin.

They are still in on JT Thor and Dawson Garcia. Kansas 2020 Basketball Offers

Edit: apologies for the on topic post.

 

[polycom]

CL82=Chief. 1 random post turned into 40 posts about nothing. Until I'm given evidence otherwise CL82=Chief. As for the relcass Javonte Brown Ferguson, we'll see what happens.

 

[444JR]

CL82=Chief. 1 random post turned into 40 posts about nothing. Until I'm given evidence otherwise CL82=Chief. As for the relcass Javonte Brown Ferguson, we'll see what happens.

*Looks for dislike button*

 

[2north]

So the most efficient answer is just to stop the chating posts?

Maybe, but the clutter doesn’t bother me, like I said it’s all comical.

 

[Scrutineer]

Kansas is also talking about redshirting Mitch Lightfoot this year. Due to the facT they have so much depth upfront this year. If they do that it cant hurt our chances with Javonte Brown Ferguson. That would be another big to be behind.

Self is such a selfless guy.
He's saving Lightfoot for whoever gets the job after he's perp walked.