Show me the clause he broke then we can talk about the buyout otherwise give him an offer and end it.
So basically pay Ollie the money because you know nothing? OkShow me the clause he broke then we can talk about the buyout otherwise give him an offer and end it.
he was fired for cause. you're assuming that's a farce and that he didn't break any stipulations in his contract. prove he didn't violate a clause in his contract even though the only available information we have states that he did.Show me the clause he broke then we can talk about the buyout otherwise give him an offer and end it.
no, Ollie played here so no matter what he did we should still pay him just because it's good for mau's feelings. that totally makes sense.So basically pay Ollie the money because you know nothing? Ok
Hope the school gets every dime and invests it back into the program.
Everyone also knows that the head coach is responsible for anything the assistants do and that might be the cause being used against KO.
I'm just wondering if that's the case why KO legal team can't then use the excuse the AD is also at fault since he is the CEO of all the teams and coaches. If the AD and UConn want to be petty then I see no reason his defense shouldn't be also
no, Ollie played here so no matter what he did we should still pay him just because it's good for mau's feelings. that totally makes sense.
You’re right. The contract was signed. And the contract is quite clear on this point. Cause is very liberally defined. Big or small is irrelevant.No a contract was signed and agreed. You don't try to weasel out of it when things go south. No one knows who big or small the "for cause" reason for firing is at this point
OMG. I don’t believe you guys are this dumb. If he VIOLATED his contract he isn’t OWED ANYTHING. You can’t just assume he didn’t. Which is what you are doing. They don’t have to tell you anything right now. If Ollie did the slightest thing to violate his contract they’d be idiots not to use it
Itd be legal malpractice to release such information before it has been settledGranted, I haven't been following the Ollie saga closely, but this is news to me. What did he do?
(I know the university has claimed cause in firing him, but as far as I know there's been no determination that they're justified in that contention.)
Maybe direct him to the Sleep Apnea thread.didn't realize sleep schedules would hit such a nerve
Granted, I haven't been following the Ollie saga closely, but this is news to me. What did he do?
(I know the university has claimed cause in firing him, but as far as I know there's been no determination that they're justified in that contention.)
Exactly - Ollie shouldn’t be trying to weasel his full $10 million out of the school. It’s not like clicking on “I Agree” to the terms of your gmail service. This is an agreement between 2 sophisticated parties that probably each had $1,000/hr employment lawyers scrub every word. His side was dumb enough to agree to a very broad definition of cause that includes any violation of NCAA rules. Maybe he’ll win, maybe he’ll lose but he and his lawyers are not some hapless victims here.No a contract was signed and agreed. You don't try to weasel out of it when things go south. No one knows who big or small the "for cause" reason for firing is at this point
That’s all I’m asking and you’d think that a guy who knows all may let us know while he acts like an idiot.
Itd be legal malpractice to release such information before it has been settled
I think he insulting those shaming the University without knowledge. Saying things like Benedict screwed up the buyout is idiotic without actually knowing if he did. And if my lawyer released important information about my case while it was still being litigated, he’d be firedNo, that's not what malpractice means.
But are you saying that there has not actually been a determination that the university was justified in claiming they fired him for cause? I can't imagine that's the case, because then JMick wouldn't be insulting anyone who hasn't taken the university's side in this based on nothing more than their say-so.
lol you're the one making the claim that Ollie didn't do anything wrong and presenting it as a fact
I'm calling out how preposterous it is to blindly assume that Benedict, Herbst, and the University all got together and decided to lie about Kevin Ollie violating his contract. Mau is actively rooting against UConn for the sake of Kevin Ollie and refuses to place any blame on him for the current predicament.No, that's not what malpractice means.
But are you saying that there has not actually been a determination that the university was justified in claiming they fired him for cause? I can't imagine that's the case, because then JMick wouldn't be insulting anyone who hasn't taken the university's side in this based on nothing more than their say-so.
I'm calling out how preposterous it is to blindly assume that Benedict, Herbst, and the University all got together and decided to lie about Kevin Ollie violating his contract. Mau is actively rooting against UConn for the sake of Kevin Ollie and refuses to place any blame on him for the current predicament.
Keep putting words into my posts Mick you’re on a roll.OMG. I don’t believe you guys are this dumb. If he VIOLATED his contract he isn’t OWED ANYTHING. You can’t just assume he didn’t. Which is what you are doing. They don’t have to tell you anything right now. If Ollie did the slightest thing to violate his contract they’d be idiots not to use it
Go to sleep, bud.So inaccurate but you’re a gem, heck UCDaveD “likes” your posts and that’s impressive.Keep putting words into my posts Mick you’re on a roll.
Threads like this keep me blissfully unconcerned about job security.
I got the joke on ignore - can't imagine what idiocy he is still spewing - I hate ignoring folks but some I just have toFO Mick you are a fn joke seriously. Where do you get the nerve to act like you’re someone?