- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 2,655
- Reaction Score
- 14,008
They should play UMass in football every year. I know why they haven't, but no reason not to now. I hope they get Temple on there a bunch too in the future.
Multi-team events aka an early season tournament such as Maui Classic, Charleston Classic, etc.From umess tweet > What are MTEs in the college sports media or scheduling world?
Daily Hampshire Gazette: UMass football linked to UConn’s impending move to independence
>>Bamford’s hypothesis is based on the fact that UMass has proven it can break the mold of traditional college football with its scheduling philosophy. The stigma before was that it would be difficult to find games to craft a schedule as an independent, but Bamford and the athletic department have found ways to schedule home-and-homes with Group of Five peers and fit in the requisite buy games from Power Five foes. And as the number of independents grows larger, so too does the pool of possible opponents, stimulating the cycle anew.<<
I know I shouldn't get my hopes up, but there is only one ACC team on that list...
Could be VT....but if it is, they would be the rare program that skips their annual FCS cupcake game to play us instead. I think the ACC game will come from another breakup of either the Wake-OD or Syr-WMU games.
I thought it it was UNC-ODU? (Not that I mind either way..)
I'm thrilled! This schedule shows UConn is still serious about FBS football and that was a massive question with the Big East move. If we can conduct FB independence more like BYU than New Mexico St then the Big East move is a win-win-win in my book.I supported Benedict's move to the Big East ever since it was announced. I supported it because the AAC tv deal was a death blow and getting our Olympic sports back to the top was a reasonable place to start.
I was very critical of his silence to Husky Nation, as we squirmed and begged for some sign of hope for our football program. But let me say this: if silence is what he needed to pull off the new 2020 schedule, which includes financial stability and a new game against a well respected SEC team, then well done, Dave Benedict.
Well done...
Daily Hampshire Gazette: UMass football linked to UConn’s impending move to independence
>>Bamford’s hypothesis is based on the fact that UMass has proven it can break the mold of traditional college football with its scheduling philosophy. The stigma before was that it would be difficult to find games to craft a schedule as an independent, but Bamford and the athletic department have found ways to schedule home-and-homes with Group of Five peers and fit in the requisite buy games from Power Five foes. And as the number of independents grows larger, so too does the pool of possible opponents, stimulating the cycle anew.<<
A little shortsighted with that article. Benedict is 100 percent right the immediate goal was putting together a schedule immediately. The name value of the schools they scheduled on such short notice and the fact they have P5 schools coming to East Hartford in the near future speaks to the long term goals. I don't think we lose any luster as a school to play against by being independent vs being in the AAC.Somewhat of a follow-up by SBN Matt Brown: One AD thinks we'll see more FBS independents. Is that wishful thinking?
It’s only bad for basketball if we do it in place of a marquee game, which I don’t see happening. We play the Vermont’s and New Hampshire’s of the world every year anyway, I wouldn’t hate playing UMass instead.UMass every year in football = Great
UMass any year in basketball = Bad
It’s only bad for basketball if we do it in place of a marquee game, which I don’t see happening. We play the Vermont’s and New Hampshire’s of the world every year anyway, I wouldn’t hate playing UMass instead.