RedStickHusky
formerly SeoulHuskyFan
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 4,703
- Reaction Score
- 18,944
Especially when talking about a guy that gave us tough minutes on an obviously still injured ankle.That is an impressive level of making stuff up.
Especially when talking about a guy that gave us tough minutes on an obviously still injured ankle.That is an impressive level of making stuff up.
This post is Exhibit A of what I was talking about yesterday and why nobody respects your opinion. We just beat a top 15 team at MSG and you come here to post this idiocy.Reed doesn’t strike me as the kind of kid that can tough out some pain. His body language was lousy today. Reibe was the better player when in.
That cut by Ross for the easy dump down is exactly the kind of headsy plays we need out of that role. These are the kind of things Stew doesn’t do.
This post is Exhibit A of what I was talking about yesterday and why nobody respects your opinion. We just beat a top 15 team at MSG and you come here to post this idiocy.
We're 7 games into the season and you have trashed basically every UConn rotation player already
It’s different because we’re fans…I have trouble sleeping when they lose. Live and die on every play…turnovers and missed shots are brutal. We may be overly critical at times but it’s because we love our team. Fox postgame guys don’t have that excuse.How's that any different than here?
Smith and Reibe were the stories of the game. Reibe's progression game to game is fun to watch. He's turning into a weapon.
James Breeding continues to be the worst.
Hurley during today’s post game presser.Reed doesn’t strike me as the kind of kid that can tough out some pain. His body language was lousy today. Reibe was the better player when in.
That cut by Ross for the easy dump down is exactly the kind of headsy plays we need out of that role. These are the kind of things Stew doesn’t do.
Hurley’s opinion is nice but has he asked the guy who loves to trash our players?Hurley during today’s post game presser.
“ Tarris Reeds courage. I mean Tarris is probably a week ahead of when he should have played but that guy was a total warrior today getting on the court “
You’re not crazy. I saw that replay and it did look like the ball hit the rim. The announcers said nothing so I assumed it was the camera angle.I need to see a replay again because I feel like I saw something different than everybody else. On the replay they showed of the "shot that didn't hit the rim", I swear I saw on the rebounding that someone (couldn't see who or what team) tipped the ball back towards the basket and the ball just barely nicked the rim. If that really happened, the clock would have reset then and the ensuing shot would count. I am doubting what I thought I saw because no one else seemed to see it. But it WOULD explain the call that everyone is arguing about.
His first crush was the freshmen not playing at UConn and now he's gone all in on a bunch of 3rd-6 year transfers (Michigan) being this unstoppable juggernaut and a matchup nightmare for us. He thinks their talent blows away ours which is fine. It's annoying and nonsensical that he does this and that he always takes shots at our guys while doing it but whatever.This is in the pantheon of stupidest things ever seen on the 'yard.
But again, when you say it's 2:32, that was the time the ball clanged off the rim. The actual time that Reibe gained possession and the 20 second clock started was a second or two later.Now I’m not following. If it’s a shooting foul at all then it’s gotta be count the basket and he shoots 1.
Edit: I think I understand… the actual time of foul from your perspective (i.e., when the whistle blew) was BEFORE the 2:10 game clock stop time. Thus, it was within the 20 seconds that started at 2:32… can’t (maybe, maybe not) have phantom time to continue the shooting motion, and if not, you can’t count the basket. But he was still shooting a three, so, three shots. Interesting perspective. I appreciate it for sure.
This is only if time expired. Then they can go back in time.They can review a play to see if a whistle was blown late. All I'm saying is that it seems totally appropriate for a player to follow the official shot clock and that, in cases where the malfunction prejudiced the team with the ball, the officials should go back in time to whenever it "malfunctioned" -- whether because it erroneously stopped or reset. I would have been really ticked off if we lost possession because of the shot clock operator.
Anyway, we won, the shot was awesome, and the result was awesome. The 11-0 Illinois run wasn't, but a 13-point lead over a good team is a great win any way you slice it.
Well sure, but other than that..Weird comment considering that we led the whole game.
When did Illinois take the lead from us? I just have missed itNah we have to figure that snit out. Can’t keep giving up leads.
No... that wasn't the explanation given.I understand what you’re saying, and it isn’t true: Reibe has the ball in two hands with 2:32 on the game clock and a reset shot clock. Either way, it’s beside the point. The explanation given for the ruling was this: “So apparently, the prior shot, which did hit the rim (okay)… clock reset to 20, but, that last flail was within the original 30” … that is nonsense.
Toughing out pain was exactly what he did by playing today.Reed doesn’t strike me as the kind of kid that can tough out some pain. His body language was lousy today. Reibe was the better player when in.
That cut by Ross for the easy dump down is exactly the kind of headsy plays we need out of that role. These are the kind of things Stew doesn’t do.
I am a high school math teacher. Maybe I should pose this question to my students.I think the math is off.
Malachi missed and the ball hit the rim but the clock resets when possession is ESTABLISHED. NOT when the ball hits the rim.
This is why 2:32 is not the correct time for the original reset.
It's more like 2:31 or 2:30.
So when the ref blows the whistle on Malachi's shot, the clock reads 2:11.
For argument sake, you could say that Malachi was fouled within the 20 seconds BUT he let the ball go AFTER the 20 seconds had run out. So you wipe away the 3 and give him 3 foul shots.
Kollieman's math and understanding is bad on this one.
Except, you know, when he played through the remainder of the game he actually got hurt in to make sure we wonReed doesn’t strike me as the kind of kid that can tough out some pain. His body language was lousy today. Reibe was the better player when in.
That cut by Ross for the easy dump down is exactly the kind of headsy plays we need out of that role. These are the kind of things Stew doesn’t do.
This is wrong. Show me a 20 playclock with 2:32 on the screen. I can show you a 2:29 screenshot with 19 seconds.I got it from seeing Reibe gain possession of the rebound and have the shot clock reset with 2:32 on the game clock. Then the whistle for the shooting foul stopped the clock at 2:10. The weird thing about the freeze frame I attached is it shows 30 on the shot clock, which was a momentary flash before it said 20 and began counting down (an anomaly I noticed throughout the broadcast).
Good in depth reply. It sounds like a correct answer on a philosophy test.I just went back and rewatched that possession from the beginning. The ultimate explanation from the announcers was not true. In the original shot clock, Smith missed a layup off the rim and they reset the clock properly. Then Karaban’s shot didn’t hit the rim, but they improperly reset the clock.
In my opinion, they handled it incorrectly: it should have been UConn possession on the baseline with about 3 second on the shot clock. The basket should not have counted because it was released after the shot clock would have expired. However, it should not have been a turnover to Illinois because the reality on the floor was a reset shot clock, and the players responded to the live ruling. So, in my opinion, they made the wrong determination to count the basket and also offered a factually untrue explanation for that decision.
Dating back to the end of the regular season from last year.Solo is so good from midrange and at the basket right now that if he could just shoot 38% from 3 he would sleepwalk to 18-20 points a game. if he wasn't still lighting it up in practice I doubt Hurley would give him free reign to hoist them up, hoping it eventually bounces back in his favor but he hasn't shot it well from 3 in any game yet dating all the way back to the exhibitions.
I don’t know why so much obsession about that call. The refs made a lot of mistakes and bad calls today. It was an awful crew and in my opinion the mistakes mostly benefited Illinois.The clock DID reset on the first shot. I had to go back because that whole situation stunk to me and the explanation does not hold up to inspection.
On a side note though, I might drop a couple quid to see Ruffy ask Tarris for his thoughts on the matter... In a face-to-face setting, I mean.This post is Exhibit A of what I was talking about yesterday and why nobody respects your opinion. We just beat a top 15 team at MSG and you come here to post this idiocy.
We're 7 games into the season and you have trashed basically every UConn rotation player already