- Joined
- Sep 21, 2011
- Messages
- 5,971
- Reaction Score
- 15,008
That's our pointNone of ESPN's top 25 football markets are north of Virginia while being east of Ohio...
Last edited:
That's our pointNone of ESPN's top 25 football markets are north of Virginia while being east of Ohio...
You don't have a point.Never said UConn was still a safety school, I said it takes time to overcome that old way of thinking.
Never said someone who didn't go to UConn couldn't be a UConn fan. I explained that I, and many of my friends are, despite not going to UConn.
Never said that all of he Bama/PSU fans are alumni.
My point exactly about UConn FB is we have to build, because we're young to the big time football stage.
In fact, I said it doesn't happen overnight and it is a generational thing.
So thank you for building that long and arduous strawman, only to come to an agreement with me at the end.
I've never seen such a pile of pointless data. It assumes that each one of the institutions you list have equal support among sports fans. Kind of silly don't you think? But let's assume for a moment that that concept has any validity. You neglect to address the population difference. CT. MA, and NJ have a population of about 18 million while Iowa, though roughly the same land mass has a population of only 3 million.
Wing U, I just don't understand you at all. I don't think that you are trolling, but I've never seen a CT fan so motivated to ignore Connecticut's strengths and work so hard to find manufacture weaknesses. I don't get it.
But hey, at least you now acknowledge the ACC's prior interest in UConn and Boston's College's role in blocking us. Baby steps.
Never said UConn was still a safety school, I said it takes time to overcome that old way of thinking.
Never said someone who didn't go to UConn couldn't be a UConn fan. I explained that I, and many of my friends are, despite not going to UConn.
Never said that all of he Bama/PSU fans are alumni.
My point exactly about UConn FB is we have to build, because we're young to the big time football stage.
In fact, I said it doesn't happen overnight and it is a generational thing.
So thank you for building that long and arduous strawman, only to come to an agreement with me at the end.
The data is what it is...utterly meaningless at least in the way you chose to try to parse it. You seem to be back sliding a bit on the BCU point as well. Let me try the same soft logic... if UConn didn't bring value why would they have been the ACC's intial choice twice?The data is what it is. Upstate brought up Iowa choosing to ignore the VAST cultural differences and the impact on education/allegiances between the states.
If the weaknesses were manufactured, we'd already be in the P5 because the rest of the ACC would have told BCU to and take UConn as the obvious most valuable choice. Sadly, I don't think you'll ever understand that because you want to pretend as if we don't have any weaknesses.
We have many strengths, our academics, our market potential, our football potential, our basketball history. Unfortunately potential is a hard sell. Of course we have a track record of elite athletic achievement across multiple sports, but as whaler (i think) said in another thread, the list of schools that are very successful at both Football and Basketball is very, very, very small. So hopefully the B12 is buying, because all we need is a seat at the table and the right coach to sustain success. How this makes me unfit to be a fan I'll never understand, but thankfully, I don't answer to anyone here.
How about Alaska, they must be the best option for the P5s under your square mile metric?
Also, UConn is really worried about Albertus Magnus eating into its ratings.
Still not following how that has much to do with the ability of the state to support 1 FBS team.
I'd wager about half the people on here went to state schools in CT or private schools in New England and still support UConn athletics.
I don't think anybody is making a Penn State comparison, but to say with a big time schedule we couldnt pack in 50k most weeks is short sighted given that in 8 win seasons in the Big East with some of the worst offenses in FBS we sold the place out at 40k.
I understand that some of us have an inflated view of UConn on here and you've been trying to ground some of that in reality, most of which I tend to agree with btw, but on this matter I dont see your point of view.
Here's a hint... when you feel like you have to keep responding with "You're missing my point", maybe it's because the point is missing!!!!
I think you threw out some random numbers about schools per square mile and then said, "then there's the obvious cultural differences and the fact that most people in the northeast place far more weight and value on a private school education, where as most people in the Midwest and south have more pride in their state school." And then you said "that doesn't change overnight, not when you have as many quality private school options as we have in the northeast."
I was simply responding to this post. There is no mention of you or your friends going or not going to UCONN. If you think I follow your other posts and keep a log, I think you're flattering yourself.
Maybe instead of Wing-U, you should change your name to Wing-Nut.
The data is what it is...utterly meaningless at least in the way you chose to try to parse it. You seem to be back sliding a bit on the BCU point as well. Let me try the same soft logic... if UConn didn't bring value why would they have been the ACC's intial choice twice?
BCU held a position on a small committee vetting candidates. Their objection to us wasn;t that we didn't bring value but rather that they wanted to be the only ACC school in New England. Their AD admitted this in writing and you've acknowledged this previously. Likewise BCU joined with FSU and Clemson to push for a Louisville FSU felt that the conference was favoring basketball in additions. That's been discussed as nauseum here, yet you seem to discount it. I have no idea why.
You're missing my point.
There are 261 schools in MA, 207 in NJ, and 114 in CT. That's 582 options within a 3-4 hour drive from most places in the state.
CT is 5,000+ square miles
MA is 10,000 + square miles
NJ is 8,000+ square miles
That's 582 options in 23,000+ square miles.
Iowa has 107 schools and 56,000 square miles.
Then there's the obvious cultural differences and the fact that most people in the northeast place far more weight and value on a private school education, where as most people in the Midwest and south have more pride in their state school. Going to a state school in CT was, for generations, a plan b. That doesn't change overnight, not when you have as many quality private school options as we have in the northeast.
I was there when we beat them in OT under dumb and dumber, and they got the ACC invite 24-48 hours later. Their setup is awesome. Everything is right there, including downtown Louisville and the KFC Yum center.I'm in Louisville today - all of their athletic facilities are visible from the highway, including a big sign with a cardinal and the ACC logo. Ugh.
I was there when we beat them in OT under dumb and dumber, and they got the ACC invite 24-48 hours later. Their setup is awesome. Everything is right there, including downtown Louisville and the KFC Yum center.
And yet your core premise is that if we'd had value we'd have been taken already, so since we haven't been taken we must lack value. Setting aside for the moment that that 'argument' is based upon the logical fallacy know as circular reason, it demonstrably false.Never discounted it. never denied it. NEVER said we didn't have value. Your problem with me would largely be solved if you didn't choose to ignore the multiple times where I explicitly said we have P5 value, and deserve to be in a P5 conference.
You are arguing from a 1970s or 80s perspective. The world of public higher education has changed dramatically in the Northeast for myriad reasons. This was driven by a couple of important developments. First, CT and many other states started making the necessary investment in public higher education. This region has long had the best elementary and secondary school education and we started putting money into our public colleges and universities. Second, the cost/value gap has widened substantially between public and private higher education. In the 70s, the cost differential wasn't as great as it is now and people could choose a private education and not break the bank..
UConn is attracting the best students because it provides a great education in a challenging atmosphere at a cost of tens of thousands less per year than the typical private school. For the top privates i.e. the Ivies, Nescac schools, MIT, this hasn't impacted applications or desire to go there and pay $65k a year. But for 2nd tier privates that charge in the $60+k range, people are balking. The Syracuses and Providences of the world have to figure out how to compete against highly rated public schools in the region that offer every bit a good education (and are rated higher in many cases) at a relative bargain. UConn has eclipsed many private institutions academically and people long ago started wondering why they should pay 21/2 times the cost for an inferior education at some nearby private school. This new reality has terrified second tier private schools because the endless supply of private school lemmings will dry up as people see the light. As far as your "plan B" reference, I know families that hoped like hell for UConn and had to settle for Syracuse. It's happening - you'll see it if you open your eyes.
Frankly the growth and development of UConn as a nationally recognized public institution is about the best thing the politicians in this state has accomplished in the last 30 years. Let's hope it continues.
And yet your core premise is that if we'd had value we'd have been taken already
They don't support it with tickets and/or donations to the program. Sadly.
I'm not sure where we disagree....here's what I said
Penn State has 100,000+ seat stadium.
There's a pretty wide gap between selling out 40,000 and selling out 105,000 no? Like about a generation wide?
You think everyone at the rent is an alumni? I'd agree that it would seem likely that donations would mostly be alumni, but just in my
I guess I misinterpreted your stance and mixed what upstater was saying.
I'm saying the foundation is there to be at a level of most the non Texas/OU schools, without needing a generation to build it up. That's all.
Apparently people don't understand tense.
Here's what I said
"Going to a state school in CT was, for generations, a plan b." (emphasis added).
"WAS". NOT "IS"
This means, I understand and acknowledge that this is no longer the case. I agree with everything you said in your post.
I agree, ignorance is bliss.Ignore is a beautiful thing.
Never said the square mile metric was a factor in what made a P5 school most attractive. I'm not even speaking to realignment with that point. It's pretty ironic that Waquoit is telling me to pipe down because "we know the score" while you ignore the fact that there a ton of options for school in the area. And those options don't preclude anyone from being a UConn fan, but they can impact how deep that allegiance runs when you take into account the short period of time we've been playing football at a high level.
Also, never said anything about ratings. But if we're talking about Fairfield County and the NY market, it would be nice if you and a few others could stop pretending like UConn isn't worried about the 9 major professional sports teams in the NY metro area. Or is that just another "manufactured" weakness. This comment will be ignored, but it's a weakness that I think we can overcome, but it is something that should be open to discussing.
What's the danger of talking about this? Do people think the B12 presidents don't know this?
You think everyone at the rent is an alumni? I'd agree that it would seem likely that donations would mostly be alumni, but just in my
It is - impressive, on campus, everything close.
UConn is in excellent shape when it comes to fanbase.
Because people took my disagreement with the statement that UConn's audience is "huge and captive" and turned it into something it's not.Why is this thread still going on and on?