- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
- Messages
- 2,814
- Reaction Score
- 7,100
Every time you say "Hami" I basically implode from cringing so hard.
I get chills when I hear that as well.
Every time you say "Hami" I basically implode from cringing so hard.
Hamidou deserves his ranking let's be clear about that. This recruitment is important let's not beat around the bush. We have had an inside track on Hami for 3 years now and he has lived at our campus last 2 years and been to numerous games. Seriously Washington keeps getting a top 10 recruit almost every year now and they never make the NCAA tournament. We should be able to get 1 with our history and pedigree. We need to beat Kentucky out for Hami for 3 reasons. :
1.) to put a NBA 1st rounder out of UCONN
2.) to say to other recruits that UCONN is a destination for top talent like Hami like Drummond etc.
3.) for national and media perception to say that UCONN goes toe to toe with the Kentucky and Dukes of the world in recruiting
I get chills when I hear that as well.
If KO can't get this top 10 recruit then I question his ability to get any....I get the KY appeal but a sad day if we lose this kid.
What evidence do you have that kids even care about what conference they play in to any significant degree?
Don't even bother. 7774 will just ignore this quote and repeat the same contrived post next time someone mentions conference affiliation. We have seen this same exact interaction dozens of times on here. Only a fool would think conference has zero impact on a recruits decision (as evidenced by asking for evidence in his signature snark). I guess sticking you head in the sand makes something not true.Based on this it appears to be important... for football at least:
Jeremy Crabtree RecruitingNation
Ninety recruits surveyed at the Under Armour All-America Game were asked if a school's conference affiliation has a major impact on their decision, and 60 percent said it does. The results in the 2017 class are consistent with polling from past classes as conference affiliation has always been an import factor in a recruit's decision.
Football is different you have to be power five to even have a chance .Based on this it appears to be important... for football at least:
Jeremy Crabtree RecruitingNation
Ninety recruits surveyed at the Under Armour All-America Game were asked if a school's conference affiliation has a major impact on their decision, and 60 percent said it does. The results in the 2017 class are consistent with polling from past classes as conference affiliation has always been an import factor in a recruit's decision.
It applies to both money sports, football and basketball.Football is different you have to be power five to even have a chance .
In football you need to be a power five to make the playoff. In basketball that is most definitely not the case.It applies to both money sports, football and basketball.
Are you guys so dense that you can't see why a basketball player would want to play in one conference over another? Seriously the fact that all teams are eligible for the tournament is the only research you need to look into before committing? What a massive oversimplification.In football you need to be a power five to make the playoff. In basketball that is most definitely not the case.
I've never said it has no impact, just that it's minimal because many, many other things are more important to recruits, and the idea that today we would be getting Kentucky/Duke classes if we were in a better conference is comical.Don't even bother. 7774 will just ignore this quote and repeat the same contrived post next time someone mentions conference affiliation. We have seen this same exact interaction dozens of times on here. Only a fool would think conference has zero impact on a recruits decision (as evidenced by asking for evidence in his signature snark). I guess sticking you head in the sand makes something not true.
The SEC is a perennially weak bb conference. Explain why Kentucky hasn't suffered. And interestingly even with football being more dependent on a P5 conference to give players exposure, 40% of the best football players weren't concerned about conference affiliation. That means that a lot of players are looking at coaches, playing time, style of play and so on.Are you guys so dense that you can't see why a basketball player would want to play in one conference over another? Seriously the fact that all teams are eligible for the tournament is the only research you need to look into before committing? What a massive oversimplification.
I'm just saying it's not nearly as important in basketball.Are you guys so dense that you can't see why a basketball player would want to play in one conference over another? Seriously the fact that all teams are eligible for the tournament is the only research you need to look into before committing? What a massive oversimplification.
I don't think kids saying they care about conference is evidence that it's one of the top factors in determing where they go to school, but maybe in football it isBased on this it appears to be important... for football at least:
Jeremy Crabtree RecruitingNation
Ninety recruits surveyed at the Under Armour All-America Game were asked if a school's conference affiliation has a major impact on their decision, and 60 percent said it does. The results in the 2017 class are consistent with polling from past classes as conference affiliation has always been an import factor in a recruit's decision.
They surveyed players ONLY and football players to bootIt applies to both money sports, football and basketball.
didn't the ncaa clear him well over a week ago? according to borges? It sounds like he really wants to play next semester.
Kentucky doesn't need the SEC to showcase its players. They are the premier program in the sport, have the biggest fan base, get the most media coverage, and play the best OOC conference schedule every year and they only play elite P5's OOC, not against Loyola Marymount's of the world. They don't really follow most logical rules of the game.The SEC is a perennially weak bb conference. Explain why Kentucky hasn't suffered. And interestingly even with football being more dependent on a P5 conference to give players exposure, 40% of the best football players weren't concerned about conference affiliation. That means that a lot of players are looking at coaches, playing time, style of play and so on.
And there is significantly less need in basketball because of the structural differences in playoffs between the two sports. The best players want to showcase their talents to get to the next level whatever their sport happens to be. The same way kids chose a university for academic reasons.
I thought I read somewhere that Kentucky has no scholarships available for 2nd semester, so if Hami wanted to play this year then Kentucky would not work....
Only UConn and Arizona have scholarships available for 2nd semester this year.
Is that accurate?