- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 457
- Reaction Score
- 3,408
My guess is UConn will be in ACC before Christmas
Yeah, where the majority are Bulldogs fans. Am I the only one having a gigantic problem believing this rumor?? And keep in mind that I've just seen Maryland and Rutgers go to the B1G, and I'm STILL having problems believing Georgia Tech. Everything feels wrong about it after analyzing it, and normally that says to me that it can't be true. Is this a smoke-screen for another team in the ACC or elsewhere? Who the hell really understands realignment anymore....
I have trouble believing it. Having GTU in the Big Ten does not cause people in Atlanta to pay for the Big Ten Network separately, nor does it allow the existing Big Ten names to make inroads into the market by bringing their existing midwestern stars there to play. Atlanta is and always will be SEC country unless the Big Ten adds UGA.
In Rutgers, they think they're getting TV revenues in Jersey (not NYC), but they get access to Big Ten fans and alumni in the entire NYC Metro area. Neither of those exist at GTU. The only similarity between GTU and RU is they both dilute the athletic quality of the conference.
If I had to guess, GT, which would join, is being used to try to smoke out UVA and/or UNC. But that is just a WAG.
I have trouble believing it. Having GTU in the Big Ten does not cause people in Atlanta to pay for the Big Ten Network separately, nor does it allow the existing Big Ten names to make inroads into the market by bringing their existing midwestern stars there to play. Atlanta is and always will be SEC country unless the Big Ten adds UGA.
In Rutgers, they think they're getting TV revenues in Jersey (not NYC), but they get access to Big Ten fans and alumni in the entire NYC Metro area. Neither of those exist at GTU. The only similarity between GTU and RU is they both dilute the athletic quality of the conference.
If I had to guess, GT, which would join, is being used to try to smoke out UVA and/or UNC. But that is just a WAG.
^Proof that we have fans in Boston!Could the BiG actually be ambling for 18 teams?
I have trouble believing it. Having GTU in the Big Ten does not cause people in Atlanta to pay for the Big Ten Network separately, nor does it allow the existing Big Ten names to make inroads into the market by bringing their existing midwestern stars there to play. Atlanta is and always will be SEC country unless the Big Ten adds UGA.
In Rutgers, they think they're getting TV revenues in Jersey (not NYC), but they get access to Big Ten fans and alumni in the entire NYC Metro area. Neither of those exist at GTU. The only similarity between GTU and RU is they both dilute the athletic quality of the conference.
If I had to guess, GT, which would join, is being used to try to smoke out UVA and/or UNC. But that is just a WAG.
My guess is UConn will be in ACC before Christmas
UConn has a bigger market than GT. Also, no competition.I agree with this, though I think GT is a fallback that the B1G would take if UVA/UNC both say no, which they can because they are both also in play, somewhat, for the SEC. GT is the low hanging fruit (of the ACC) for the B1G to get, IMO. They aren't going to be pursued by the SEC and are lower on the list for the Big 12, though likely would be called on. GT is still probably higher up the list than UConn, but of the ACC pickings they shouldn't be that high.
I understand that all of these conference moves are based on money but is the biggest factor the TV dollars? I only ask because I live in Ridgefield and had no clue until the other day that I get the BT Network. I never asked for it so it must come with whatever sports package I've had with Comcast for umpteen years.
^Proof that we have fans in Boston!
18 is a possibility, yes.
They only reason they are currently Bulldog fans is because Georgia keeps running over Georgia Tech in football. However the extra 10 million could buy a top notch coach who would bring in top notch recruits to deal with Georgia. Plus this hides the fact that Georgia Tech was once again run over by Georgia for the year... it will quickly be forgotten
I agree with this, though I think GT is a fallback that the B1G would take if UVA/UNC both say no, which they can because they are both also in play, somewhat, for the SEC. GT is the low hanging fruit (of the ACC) for the B1G to get, IMO. They aren't going to be pursued by the SEC and are lower on the list for the Big 12, though likely would be called on. GT is still probably higher up the list than UConn, but of the ACC pickings they shouldn't be that high.
You got any big-time corporate friends you can lobby?The Biggest factor is the TV dollars. For the Ten, the issue is not primarily how many households does the Big Ten Network penetrate as much as how much per subscriber can they get out of the cable companies for it. In Ridgefield, I guaranty you they are not getting a fraction per subscriber as what they get in cable companies in Michigan and Nebraska because they have no leverage. The more of an eastern presence in the Ten, and, in Ridgefield, the more of a UConn presence, the better their ability to demand a higher payment from the cable companies.
Does that help?
I've been thinking the exact same thing. And ironically the ACC presidents will be meeting face to face over the next 36 hours because of their championship game tomorrow.
It would not shock me if both UConn and Cincy took the field tomorrow - on ABC no less - with ACC invites in hand. Not saying I'm holding my breath, I just wouldn't be shocked.
Despite earlier predictions, the carousel has not stopped yet, and the Swofford knows it.
UConn has a bigger market than GT. Also, no competition.
Could the BiG actually be ambling for 18 teams?
Could the BiG actually be ambling for 18 teams?
The Biggest factor is the TV dollars. For the Ten, the issue is not primarily how many households does the Big Ten Network penetrate as much as how much per subscriber can they get out of the cable companies for it. In Ridgefield, I guaranty you they are not getting a fraction per subscriber as what they get in cable companies in Michigan and Nebraska because they have no leverage. The more of an eastern presence in the Ten, and, in Ridgefield, the more of a UConn presence, the better their ability to demand a higher payment from the cable companies.
Does that help?
We'll see how that works out. We can get into the B1G and THEN get accepted into the AAU. I am going to talk to my UM doctor about this and tell him to get his UM buddies on the UConn bandwagon. He's all for UConn in the B1G. UM is one of the biggest influences in the B1G.Yes but the AAU factor may play a role, who knows it's all such a crapshoot and spin. The conferences are doing a better job of spinning things than most politicians.
True, but Delany and the B1G don't strike me as taking an outlier straight on tv #. They are very deliberate and calculated in their movements. They're going to take teams that make sense regionally academically and athletically. UVA fits the bill. Uconn is close, but we don't have aau. I would think UVA and unc over GT plus one any day.For the 800th time on this board, there is no rule. They could take Alaska Anchorage if they want.
I think this gets done fast
What do they do with GTU if UNC and UVA end up in the SEC. That would devastate GTU athletics in the long run, just like the geographic isolation has harmed BCU, and do no one any good.
We'll see how that works out. We can get into the B1G and THEN get accepted into the AAU. I am going to talk to my UM doctor about this and tell him to get his UM buddies on the UConn bandwagon. He's all for UConn in the B1G. UM is one of the biggest influences in the B1G.