Book it!
Book it!
They did not.Not sure what you're referring to? Are you saying Nova didn't chase FBS football dreams?
I think Villanova made the right choice for their situation of being a small, private school without obvious and super compelling reasons to go FBS. It has been and will continue to be very difficult (even more so with NIL and revenue sharing on the horizon) for small, non-state schools to make the move and have sustained success at the FBS level.They did not.
I don’t agree with it, but they did not.
If you look just in the ACC, the Eastern privates are Wake, Duke, Cuse, Miami, and BC.I think Villanova made the right choice for their situation of being a small, private school without obvious and super compelling reasons to go FBS. It has been and will continue to be very difficult (even more so with NIL and revenue sharing on the horizon) for small, non-state schools to make the move and have sustained success at the FBS level.
We know how history turned out, but we can never be certain at what might have been.Villanova made the right decision at the time and it has proven to be the correct one as this has all unfolded. Small privates will not survive in this new era of college football.
I doubt even that scenario would have been sustainable in the current climate. This is a money grab of the first order with nothing in the way of cost control. There is no leadership to align the interests of financial gain, the student athlete and academics....to the extent academics is even remotely relevant anymore.We know how history turned out, but we can never be certain at what might have been.
IF the founding of the Big East could have been reconciled with JoPa’s Eastern Football vision, we may have ended up with a super conference that was more sustainable.
After the later Big East football was set in motion, IF Nova had moved up in football on first invite, maybe there would have been enough critical mass to survive later departures, the resulting Tulane and Tulsa addition rounds, and the eventual split.
- The 10 football members: Syracuse, BC, Pitt, Nova, Holy Cross, Rutgers, Penn State, WV, UConn, UMass
- The 6 non-football members: Providence, St John’s, Georgetown, Seton Hall, Duquesne, GW
The Eastern athletics alignments could have been very different. It’s not all on Nova’s shoulders, but they were one of eight that could have set a different course.
IF the founding of the Big East could have been reconciled with JoPa’s Eastern Football vision
I’m also cynical of the current landscape and the future.I doubt even that scenario would have been sustainable in the current climate. This is a money grab of the first order with nothing in the way of cost control. There is no leadership to align the interests of financial gain, the student athlete and academics....to the extent academics is even remotely relevant anymore.
Top tier academic institutions like Vilanova will not be playing this game for very long - and that will evenutally include hoops. I would argue that those institutions in the power conferences will be in a similar spot soon as they realize they will not be able to compete and retain talent - BC, Vandy, etc. I'm not sure UCONN hangs in there with football and if they don't, then can they continue to compete at the highest level in hoops?
Ugly situation.....
I’m not sure about that. Penn State may have been the anchor and leader for an Eastern Football. They would have raised up Pitt, Cuse, BC, and the rest. Miami, WV, and Temple would have also likely joined.If Penn State had joined the Big East, they would have been the first to leave for greener/Big10 pastures; before the waves of schools leaving for the ACC.
If Penn State is in the big east, then Pittsburgh never gets an invite.I’m not sure about that. Penn State may have been the anchor and leader for an Eastern Football. They would have raised up Pitt, Cuse, BC, and the rest. Miami, WV, and Temple would have also likely joined.
The entire dynamic would have been different. We can’t know the outcome with any certainty.
It's pure economics. If you are Penn State and you have the opportunity to go to the Big10 with its reserarch/AAU synergies and more valuable football properties, it's an absolute no-brainer.I’m not sure about that. Penn State may have been the anchor and leader for an Eastern Football. They would have raised up Pitt, Cuse, BC, and the rest. Miami, WV, and Temple would have also likely joined.
The entire dynamic would have been different. We can’t know the outcome with any certainty.
If Penn State had joined the Big East, they would have been the first to leave for greener/Big10 pastures; before the waves of schools leaving for the ACC.
Penn State and Pitt were both considered as basketball adds. If instead, a Big East - Eastern 8 merger with an incorporation of football were taken at the time, they both could have been founding members.If Penn State is in the big east, then Pittsburgh never gets an invite.
JoePa cared about Eastern Football. He couldn’t pull it together on his own.This is exactly right. Penn State cares about one thing and one thing only......playing football at the highest level. Think about what they swept under the carpet with Sandusky. To think that Penn State would do anything other than what they believe to be in their immediate best interest is wishful thinking at best.
JoePa cared about Eastern Football. He couldn’t pull it together on his own.
Penn State cares about all of their sports. Wrestling is pretty good. So is volleyball.
Pitt was added after Penn State was turned down. I believe they lost by a single vote, if I recall correctly.Penn State and Pitt were both considered as basketball adds. If instead, a Big East - Eastern 8 merger with an incorporation of football were taken at the time, they both could have been founding members.
I believe Pitt was confirmed in 1981 to join in 1982. Pitt was selected over Penn State. I think Penn State then asked to officially join in 1982 but was one vote short. All in the context of hoops.Pitt was added after Penn State was turned down. I believe they lost by a single vote, if I recall correctly.
Both Penn State and Pitt came up for a vote in 1982. I believe the Pitt vote was after the Penn State vote.I believe Pitt was confirmed in 1981 to join in 1982. Pitt was selected over Penn State. I think Penn State then asked to officially join in 1982 but was one vote short. All in the context of hoops.
What was missing was the vision to incorporate football from the start and merge the Eastern 8 with the Big East startup.