8893
Curiouser
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,847
- Reaction Score
- 96,454
You sure it’s not Fatts passing on Hurley?This is 100% Hurley taking a pass on him.
You sure it’s not Fatts passing on Hurley?This is 100% Hurley taking a pass on him.
There's no way he would put out a list of 13 teams and not have UConn on it unless he was told something. He's super tight with Hurley and Tyrese is his best friend.You sure it’s not Fatts passing on Hurley?
No UConn
good enough for gonzaga but not UConn lol
We mentored a player who starts at URI, so we watched at least 1/2 their games and Fatts was injured most of the season, he kept trying to come back and kept not being able to finish games. By the end of the season, he was able to play the whole game, but his quicks weren’t the same as when healthy. He was a warrior trying to play at way less than 100%. Love that mentality. Boat was a warrior.Honestly surprised his list is as good as it is. Guy shot about 34% from the field, 25% from three last season in a mid-major conference and its not like he makes up for the poor shooting by being a playmaker with only 4.5 assists p/g. Horrendous numbers. The complete opposite of the type of player we need right now.
Basically, one of the quickest players in the country to donnell Beverly quicks. cole a much better shooter than dbev obvGonzaga is losing its entire starting backcourt.
Even if he is an upgrade on Cole, how much is it and is it worth not landing another shooter?
That’s the question.
All we need to do is watch a replay of the Maryland game and recognize that a backcourt of Fatts and Cole or Gaffney simply cannot exist. Couple that with Whaley graduating, and the above mentioned backcourt would not only get bullied, it probably gets Sanogo in quick foul trouble offering help side defense. Fatts is a very good player but given how this roster is constructed, he is an easy pass, unfortunately.I like Fatts. In a different world he'd make sense on this team.
We don't live in that world. If he came here I'd be happy enough, but I'm glad this is the outcome.
Good luck to him wherever he goes. He'll be a good.
it's a big upgrade and we could still have gotten 2 other shooters; on the wing and a stretch 4.Even if he is an upgrade on Cole, how much is it and is it worth not landing another shooter?
That’s the question.
it's a big upgrade and we could still have gotten 2 other shooters; on the wing and a stretch 4.
Fatts would probably be our best player next year, with Sanogo a close second. If Hurley passed, he’s got to have another option lined up. Or maybe, Fatts is just having some fun with all the interest and he just hasn’t had a real discussion with Hurley yet. I want to get Fatts, a shooter and a big (or keep Whaley).
That would be 4 players, we only have 3 open scholarships.it's a big upgrade and we could still have gotten 2 other shooters; on the wing and a stretch 4.
'I want to get Fatts'Fatts would probably be our best player next year, with Sanogo a close second. If Hurley passed, he’s got to have another option lined up. Or maybe, Fatts is just having some fun with all the interest and he just hasn’t had a real discussion with Hurley yet. I want to get Fatts, a shooter and a big (or keep Whaley).
FIFYThat would be 4 players, we only have 3 open scholarships.
i said fatts and 2 other shooters that means 3. the shooters would be a wing and a stretch 4it's a big upgrade and we could still have gotten 2 other shooters: on the wing and a stretch 4.
Its an insecurity of his. It comes from stating his opinion as fact then often times being extremly wrong. Its what he does. When he digs himself even deeper, he usually reverts to name calling.FIFY
i said fatts and 2 other shooters that means 3. the shooters would be a wing and a stretch 4
if you were pointing out my semicolon typo then you should have assumed I meant 5 players, not 4: fatts, two shooters, a wing, and a stretch 4...
always looking for a reason to prove me wrong idk why...usually about the most trivial stuff too.
We mentored a player who starts at URI, so we watched at least 1/2 their games and Fatts was injured most of the season, he kept trying to come back and kept not being able to finish games. By the end of the season, he was able to play the whole game, but his quicks weren’t the same as when healthy. He was a warrior trying to play at way less than 100%. Love that mentality. Boat was a warrior.
Please, please stop quoting his injured year stats, he was a monster as a junior. He’s that guy.
He's Ryan Boatright esque. And thats not hyperboleI don’t understand why people won’t listen. Fatts was hurt. His numbers were stellar his junior year. He’s a good player and pretty good shooter too.
I mean, Boatright was an incredible athlete on a level I don't see in Fatts.He's Ryan Boatright esque. And thats not hyperbole
You just described Ryan Boatright. Boat was a slightly better shooter that played with WAAAAAAAY better talent. Surround Fatts with better offensive talent and his efficiency numbers would increase. Fatts may be faster than Boat, with boat being the better leaper. But we're really splitting hairs at that pointI mean, Boatright was an incredible athlete on a level I don't see in Fatts.
His senior year Boatright averaged 17ppg on 41% shooting from 3 (42 from the field ?), but he was also an absolute killer defender. Fatt's best season were well below both those shooting numbers (38% from field, 36% from 3). He's definitely a shooter, in the sense that he takes a lot of shots...and he definitely makes things happen.
But, again, a 5'10" kid who—at his absolute best—a mediocre shooter and bad finisher, but streaky and exciting and can get into the lane and pass, is not a good fit on this team.