Dude please, Giffey, Daniels, And Olander was in Cahouns dog house, couldn't get a sniff of playing time. Napier was terrible his sophomore season. Boatright was ok his freshman year. Brimah, Omar Calhoun, Nolan, Kromah, and Samuels never played for Calhoun. Recruiting was tough because Coach Calhoun left Ollie in a tough spot.
They were young when JC had them, so obviously they'd play less than more experienced players. Of course they were 'in the dog house'. I thought that was just common sense.
That Giffey/Shabazz class all won a NC already. Incredibly valuable experience. [in contrast, we only have 2 guys with who've played in 2 NCAA tournament games on this team]
But everybody knew what we had in Daniels, Shabazz, Boat, etc. Giffey was a nice jack of all trades who grew steadly every year into what he was. They all had potential to be good to great players as they got older. Not so with this team.
Some on this board didn't think Ollie would have won 10 games his first season. Hurley is in a better spot his first season than what Ollie was in.
Not often I say this, but that last statement is an all time awful take. The team that came back in 2013 would have competed for the AAC title this year. Not a single player from this past year's team would start on that one (Boat would start over Jalen). Most wouldn't even make that team.
As a huge Ollie supporter, it sounds like you are just trying to rewrite the narrative on Hurley era before it begins. If he makes the tournament next year, it will be damn near a miracle.
UCONN was one of the worst teams in America last year. If Hurley turned it completely around in year 1, then he might be Jim Calhoun 2.0.
And those who didn't think Ollie would win 10 games really shouldn't be discussing college basketball.