Magic was the most incredible player I ever saw in college, thought he was better than MJ. In the pros MJ was #1 in my book.Magic Johnson pretty much sums it up in eight words: "There's Michael, then there's the rest of us."
Magic was the most incredible player I ever saw in college, thought he was better than MJ. In the pros MJ was #1 in my book.Magic Johnson pretty much sums it up in eight words: "There's Michael, then there's the rest of us."
Is there a stat for 5 seconds. 24 seconds to 10 seconds to 5 seconds
A lot of people forget what a dominant player Bird was in college as well. He was a one man wrecking crew, brought Indiana State to the NCAA finals IIRC. Lost to Magic and Michigan State.My top 10-
1) Jordan
2) Lebron
3) Kareem
4) Magic and Bird (tied)
6) Wilt
7) Russell
8) Hakeem
9) Duncan
10) Shaq
Oscar, Kobe, Dr. J outside looking in.
I see a lot of these all-time lists and often Bird is underrated. When he came to the Celtics they were in last place. Bird was basically done at 31 with a debilitating back but gutted it out a few more years off of sheer grit and skill.
When Bird was drafted the Celtics went from worst to first. They were 29-53 the season before Larry got there, Bird's rookie year they went 61-21. For that 7 year prime before his back got the best of him Bird averaged 27 ppg, 10 rebs, 6 assist, 2 steals, 51% fg, 39.5% 3pt. 89% ft. In Bird's prime he was the best player in the world, slightly ahead of Magic. When people talk about the greateat players ever Magic is always at the top and Bird seems like an afterthought.
Both Bird and Magic's careers were cut too short.
Excellent points. Agree Jordan and Lebron is super close, and I feel bad saying it but Kobe is fringe top 10 at bestBetween Lebron and MJ there is no wrong choice, just a matter of preference. I have Lebron ahead, but both are deserving.
My beef is the rest of the list. May he Rest In Glory, but Kobe was far too inefficient to be top 10. He played almost half his career as Shaq's "Robin" and still never managed a great FG%. Lebron, Jordan, Bird, Dr. J, hell KD are all great non-bigs and all shot at least 48% from the field. You can't be inefficient at the thing that is your best attribute. His career numbers are almost identical to Carmelo's.
Agreed. But if he shows up game one, that series never goes seven games. For the hype he gets, he should get a pass on always showing up late in big series.He was unreal though. Games 3-7:
30.8 / 4.4 / 4.2 plus 1.8 steals on an insane .508 / .467 / .952 split.
For the series Steph was 22.6 / 4.9 / 3.7 (with a brutal 4.3 TOV/g). Shot .403 / .400 / .929
The problem with your analysis is that the level of talent greatly diminished as time passed.
Jordan had to go against Bird, Issiah, Magic, Wilkins, Ewing, Shaq, Olajuwan, Robinson, Malone, Barkley, Kemp, and so many more all stars.
Lebron is amazing, but honestly, the NBA during the Lebron era pales into comparison with the heavy weights the Jordan faced every game.
Jordan > Lebron
So which team Jordan beat in the finals would you say was better than the Durant, Curry, Thompson, Green Warriors? Which was better than the Duncan, Parker, Ginobli, Popovich-coached Spurs?
Kobe was so prolific it is hard to push him lower. Personally, I think Dirk had a better but less spectacular career. I don't have Kobe in my top 10. I think he and Dirk fall somewhere between 15 - 20.Excellent points. Agree Jordan and Lebron is super close, and I feel bad saying it but Kobe is fringe top 10 at best
That should be more a reflection of how the modern NBA is officiated, with more ticky-tack calls and flagrants, than a condemnation of Lebron himself. It's almost stupid not to react to fouls that way these days to earn FT's. If you want to say there's an embarrasing extreme of that look at Harden.Lebron's a freak physical talent but his flopping is an embarrassment which is why he may be top 10 or even top 5 but #2 is a stretch. I could never imagine MJ or Wilt getting grazed by someone's hand and falling down and rolling around on the floor like they got hit with a tire iron.
Your saying none of Giannis, Curry, Durant, Kawhi, and his other contemporaries have no chance of getting there someday? Obviously Jordan's contemporaries can be judged and placed because we can look at the whole sample of their careers.Take a look at the top 25 in this list and compare how many of them Jordan competed against and how many of them Lebron competed against. Jordan competed against more of the all-time greats than Lebron has.
But Wade by his 3rd year with Lebron was already a defenseive liability because of his bad knee. By his 4th year he was practically washed. Just look at the couple years after that if you don't believe me. Lebron only got 2 years of playing with the "better than Pippen version" of Wade and year 1 they struggled to coexist due to poor coaching and being hated by fans everywhere.Wade is better than Pippen and I don't consider it close. Pippen was a great player but that espn list is a joke. They have Pippen ranked way ahead of Drexler, ahead of Barkley, Wade, Elgin Baylor, David Robinson etc.
Rodman and Bosh are so hard to compare. Rodman was an amazing rebounder and defender, Bosh an offensive force. Bosh was way better than Horace Grant.
Why? Great players tend to recognize greatness in other players a lot better than random people who don't play the game do.Legend X says player X is the goat has to be the worst sports argument.
Did anyone ever average a triple double for their entire NBA career?
Like when Magic said that Lonzo was gonna break all his recordsWhy? Great players tend to recognize greatness in other players a lot better than random people who don't play the game do.
Phil Jackson? Isiah Thomas? Jordan?Why? Great players tend to recognize greatness in other players a lot better than random people who don't play the game do.
A lot of ppl take Pippen over Wade. Wade a better scorer but Pippen better in every other category. I’m not very high on think He’s a guy that put up numbers on raptors teams that were bad to average. but hard to argue grant was better then him.Wade is better than Pippen and I don't consider it close. Pippen was a great player but that espn list is a joke. They have Pippen ranked way ahead of Drexler, ahead of Barkley, Wade, Elgin Baylor, David Robinson etc.
Rodman and Bosh are so hard to compare. Rodman was an amazing rebounder and defender, Bosh an offensive force. Bosh was way better than Horace Grant.
The better argument would be who was more valuable between Rodman and Bosh.A lot of ppl take Pippen over Wade. Wade a better scorer but Pippen better in every other category. I’m not very high on think He’s a guy that put up numbers on raptors teams that were bad to average. but hard to argue grant was better then him.
My top 10-
1) Jordan
2) Lebron
3) Kareem
4) Magic and Bird (tied)
6) Wilt
7) Russell
8) Hakeem
9) Duncan
10) Shaq
Oscar, Kobe, Dr. J outside looking in.
I see a lot of these all-time lists and often Bird is underrated. When he came to the Celtics they were in last place. Bird was basically done at 31 with a debilitating back but gutted it out a few more years off of sheer grit and skill.
When Bird was drafted the Celtics went from worst to first. They were 29-53 the season before Larry got there, Bird's rookie year they went 61-21. For that 7 year prime before his back got the best of him Bird averaged 27 ppg, 10 rebs, 6 assist, 2 steals, 51% fg, 39.5% 3pt. 89% ft. In Bird's prime he was the best player in the world, slightly ahead of Magic. When people talk about the greateat players ever Magic is always at the top and Bird seems like an afterthought.
Both Bird and Magic's careers were cut too short.
Wade was a #1 who could carry a team to championships. Pippen just never had the game to do that.A lot of ppl take Pippen over Wade. Wade a better scorer but Pippen better in every other category. I’m not very high on think He’s a guy that put up numbers on raptors teams that were bad to average. but hard to argue grant was better then him.
I don't know what this means?Phil Jackson? Isiah Thomas? Jordan?
Great players who couldn't identify talent as executivesI don't know what this means?
I don't know what this means?
Great players who couldn't identify talent as executives
What does that have to do with them deciding who is the greatest player of all-time? Who is better equipped to say who the best is than the guys who played the game at the highest level and actually went head to head against them?Great players who couldn't identify talent as executives
Don't shoot the messengerWhat does that have to do with them deciding who is the greatest player of all-time? Who is better equipped to say who the best is than the guys who played the game at the highest level and actually went head to head against them?
Excellent points. Agree Jordan and Lebron is super close, and I feel bad saying it but Kobe is fringe top 10 at best
Wade was a #1 who could carry a team to championships. Pippen just never had the game to do that.
Wade was a fantastic all around player. If you look at peak Pippen without Jordan (mostly), 1993-1995 he was excellent:I get your point because they’re different types of offensive players... Pip was not the pure scorer Wade was but I dno if that makes Wade clearly better. In fact, Pippens all around game is so much better than Wade, I weigh that pretty heavily.
I think Pippen is criminally underrated. Wade did that once, with Shaq and a good cast. Pippen only had one season to try it and he got to the ECF with a great, MVP type season.
I get your point because they’re different types of offensive players... Pip was not the pure scorer Wade was but I dno if that makes Wade clearly better. In fact, Pippens all around game is so much better than Wade, I weigh that pretty heavily.
Wade was a fantastic all around player. If you look at peak Pippen without Jordan (mostly), 1993-1995 he was excellent:
22 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 5.5 apg, 3 spg, 1 bpg
Peak Wade without LeBron (2005-2010)
27 ppg, 5 rpg, 7 apg, 2 spg, 1 bpg
Pippen, beyond stats, was one of the best defenders ever. Wade, though, did make 3 All NBA Second Team Defensive teams. He wasn't a slouch.