- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,381
- Reaction Score
- 23,714
We must have very different definitions of "huge void".
Well, there must be a reason the Big Ten added them, no?
We must have very different definitions of "huge void".
in terms of a pre-existing natural football rival, Rutgers would be missed.We must have very different definitions of "huge void".
Well, having Moe, Larry and Curley as coaches was part of the reason for that......but we had a losing record in conference play in the last 4 years combined in the AAC and were only 1 game over .500 overall in those same 4 years.
Shemp was definitely on the staff....Well, having Moe, Larry and Curley as coaches was part of the reason for that......
I always love the vitriol that a number of posters on this board display to this day about KO and then, in other threads, many of the same posters state that the demise of the program was due to the AAC. You can gave it both ways, yes, AAC membership would have made it considerably more difficult to restore the program (after KO sunk it) than BE membership would have. That doesn't mean that if KO did his job correctly we would have still sunk. If we maintained our level of success from the last eight or so years in the BE we would have been fine.Everyone will have their own opinion about the circumstances and the reasons why, but we had a losing record in conference play in the last 4 years combined in the AAC and were only 1 game over .500 overall in those same 4 years.
Draw your own conclusions. But that’s what people are looking at.
Does it though?losing Rutgers still leaves a huge void.
Well, there must be a reason the Big Ten added them, no?
in terms of a pre-existing natural football rival, Rutgers would be missed.
I'd wager that Syracuse, from when they first joined the ACC up until JB decided it was more important playing his kids did every bit as well as they did over the same time frame through their last day in the BE.It has nothing to do with our level as a program. There are far more examples of teams leaving the Big East and failing to maintain basketball excellence, than leaving the Big East and succeeding.
There are football-first fans here who think this lineup would be great. Here is one of several responses to one of my very few posts on the Football Forum. I don't think I'll go back there. They're an emotional bunch.Who are the top names in B12 ? Kansas?
I’m salivating at the thought of OK state, Texas Tech, Iowa State, TCU etc… real marquee stuff here.
You're talking about UConn being back in an all sports northeast conference with pretty much all of our rivals... yes Rutgers was a football rival but that would be trivial in the scheme of this scenario.
There are football-first fans here who think this lineup would be great. Here is one of several responses to one of my very few posts on the Football Forum. I don't think I'll go back there. They're an emotional bunch.
I thought it pointless to respond.
Kansas tournamentThere are football-first fans here who think this lineup would be great. Here is one of several responses to one of my very few posts on the Football Forum. I don't think I'll go back there. They're an emotional bunch.
I thought it pointless to respond.
It's time to focus on football
so recognizing that UConn is never getting invited to the BIG or SEC, what's the best outcome?Im all for finding a good solution for all of us. But it is wrong to ask us to twist in the wind again for a wing and a prayer.
I try to be sympathetic as a UConn alum and fan. I love all our schools sports but when they accuse me of wanting the football program to die because I'm a hoops fan, it is not accurate, in fact it's the opposite, I keep seeing decisions made that hurt the hoops program to give the football program an oxygen mask. I remember how many people were upset when we went to BigEast and had to have indy football instead of staying in AAC to stick out football. You guys were wrong. It's been proven. And now I want to trust you again? You want hoops to put their necks on a chopping block AGAIN. For what?
Im all for finding a good solution for all of us. But it is wrong to ask us to twist in the wind again for a wing and a prayer. Let Jim Mora ( who I love) continue to work his magic and lets actually do something here. Not end up in AAC 2.0
I can't keep this straight, so we're a blue blood and one of the nations best programs or being in an average league for 5 years was going to be the death of the sport itself at UConn?
Cool. There are 3 teams there that are not flashes. Kansas with Self, Baylor with Drew, and Houston with Sampson. All the rest are Providence lite. K state, Cinci (lol Kobe) TCU (what?) Iowa State (who?) OK state (wait what? ) are zilch in the BBall landscape. Keep me with Pitino, Smart, McDermott, Miller, Cooley, Matta, et.al.The people comparing the B12 to the AAC are mental. Let's take a look at the top 50 2023 recruiting rankings, excluding UConn, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Big 12:
#6 Kansas
#9 Oklahoma State
#11 Iowa State
#12 Baylor
#20 Kansas State
#22 Houston
#35 Cincy
#49 TCU
Big East:
#16 Xavier
#27 Marquette
End of list.
But sure, the B12 is bad for basketball...
Cool. There are 3 teams there that are not flashes. Kansas with Self, Baylor with Drew, and Houston with Sampson. All the rest are Providence lite. K state, Cinci (lol Kobe) TCU (what?) Iowa State (who?) OK state (wait what? ) are zilch in the BBall landscape. Keep me with Pitino, Smart, McDermott, Miller, Cooley, Matta, et.al.
I may not know football enough, but I KNOW basketball. Big East is a better conference over next 8 years all things being equal on a hoops floor.
Plus, nobody gives a crap about the Big 12. The Big East has rivalries UConn fans and alumni care about.
Cant wait until BYU is at Gampel on a Wednesday night.Thats been proven too. Im supposed to get excited about UCF and Cincinatti and Houston coming back to XL? Texas tech? TCU? Iowa State?
The people comparing the B12 to the AAC are mental. Let's take a look at the top 50 2023 recruiting rankings, excluding UConn, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Big 12:
#6 Kansas
#9 Oklahoma State
#11 Iowa State
#12 Baylor
#20 Kansas State
#22 Houston
#35 Cincy
#49 TCU
Big East:
#16 Xavier
#27 Marquette
End of list.
But sure, the B12 is bad for basketball...
Half those coaches won’t be at big east schools if they continue doing well. That’s because schools in the top conferences can afford to buy them away. You think Shaka and Miller see those schools as their end games? McDermott has been in tons of rumors over the last couple seasons. The only programs immune to this are UConn/Nova/Georgetown because their prestige is relative to blue bloods.Cool. There are 3 teams there that are not flashes. Kansas with Self, Baylor with Drew, and Houston with Sampson. All the rest are Providence lite. K state, Cinci (lol Kobe) TCU (what?) Iowa State (who?) OK state (wait what? ) are zilch in the BBall landscape. Keep me with Pitino, Smart, McDermott, Miller, Cooley, Matta, et.al.
I may not know football enough, but I KNOW basketball. Big East is a better conference over next 8 years all things being equal on a hoops floor. and thats before we even talk about why its better to be in the Northeast.