Not that weird. I have recently seen a family squabble, which is why I thought of it.Weird thing to bring up and no Ollie isn't going to skip Calhoun's funeral, he's not that bad a guy.
Why pay a guy who's contract (which is the only reason you'd pay him) says you don't have to pay him?
Oh cmon with all this talk that he had a lot of offers and was loyal to the school. I’m sure after 14 this was the case, but when he got the additional extension there were rumors about him going to Oklahoma City and other clubs but I firmly believe that was just great work by his agent and PR people, to get him another, more lucrative extension. After that extension he stopped caring and trying, stop blaming the AAC on everything.I think that Ollie's experience at UConn looks very different to people in coaching and the business of basketball.
Ollie showed incredible loyalty to UConn when he didn't bolt after the 2014 championship and decided to stay at a school that had received a virtual permanent exile from big time basketball when we got left behind in the AAC. The AAC was a death sentence for UConn athletics. Most of the world recognized that there was no way the athletic program could be successful as the northern outlier in a southern mid-major conference. I think Ollie, who won a National Championship as an assistant in 2011 and another one as a Head Coach in 2014, had a big enough ego that he thought that he could pull off being the Gonzaga of the AAC.
Ollie was wrong. He chased recruits that he could have easily closed in the Big East, but didn't want to play at a mid-major, and then he ended up scrambling for players like Gilbert that were literally damaged goods. Even a lot of the players he closed decided they didn't want to be at a cold weather school that had been bounced out of the big time. Ollie should have better calibrated which recruits he could close at a program that was sliding down the basketball hierarchy, but there isn't a text book for managing a program down the path to irrelevancy. The closest historical comparable was Houston post-Guy Lewis and post-SWC, and Houston didn't manage it well either.
NO UCONN COACH could have maintained any level of success in the AAC. This conference was going to destroy UConn athletics, and even though we are going back to the big time, it may be too late. Ollie was a casualty of the conference debacle as much as anything, and I will not hold him completely responsible for UConn basketball's decline post-2014.
Then, after all that, UConn walks away from a contract that it had promised Ollie when he had a lot of other offers. That will leave a bad taste in a lot of people's mouth, like Caron's.
The alternative is worse.OK, the problem is his "friends" are going to be less inclined to provide support for the program. They are turning away from the program. That is a problem.
The alternative is worse.
Maybe he will, but remember he's the one that screwed up his tenure and ending at UConn. Programs don't run themselves so maybe if he cherished what he had a little more wouldn't be in this mess.Good thing Kevin Ollie gets to write the ending to the Kevin Ollie story. He gets to decide how his story will move forward, not you maniacs. He will have great success again.
I'm not talking merits or anything. I don't know enough to.UConn says KO breached the contract; was fired for cause and thus under its terms he due no more payments. KO believes that he should be paid as if he was not fired for cause. (An oft forgotten note is that UConn paid KO for 6 months (I think) after he was fired. So he's already gotten $1.5M as de facto severance.)
If Kevin left right away without the adverse publicity a settlement would have had more value to UConn. At this point, not so much. Given the relative merits of the parties' positions, what do you believe to be a reasonable resolution at this point in time?
It's factual that KO was fired.Hello Hans. Not sure I understand your proposed question. Would you like me to respond to the argument that KO was fired for both losing and for cause?
FWIW, I don't believe for a second the narrative that KO is stuck at $10M and won't budge. I'd expect the real number to be significant discount.Whether or not $10 million is worth keeping a bunch of legendary players happy is up to your personal preference, was my only point.
Let's also not forget that there is a union involved. This complicates matters as well.FWIW, I don't believe for a second the narrative that KO is stuck at $10M and won't budge. I'd expect the real number to be significant discount.
I think the biggest impediment may be the fact that any settlement probably has to be public and can't be confidential, because he's a state employee and UConn is a public university. If this could have been done privately I think it would have resolved a long time ago.