I am not ignoring the fact that violations occurred - they did. I am simply saying that those violations were merely the public reasoning the school gave for his firing, so they did not have to pay him the remainder. We all know that he got fired for the team's losing record and poor performance. If those reasons fall under the *for cause* definition, then the school owes him nothing. I just don't like the false narrative that the school let him him go for x/y/z violations, when they really let him go because he was losing and the fan base was irate. The way things played out, it was as if UCONN wanted to fire him, did so, and then went and found reasons to justify it when the real reason was losing. Where I work, this is like my boss firing me because I stink at my job, but then the company realizes it doesn't have to pay me a severance if they can prove I was doing things that they kinda sorta thought I was doing while employed, but never truly looked into, prior to firing me.It's factual that KO was fired.
It's common assertion that dissatisfaction with his performance led to widespread displeasure among the fan base, and that the University Administration and Athletic Department shared this dissatisfaction and exercised its prerogative to terminate KO's employment as coach. In simple language, this would bolster the claim that he was fired because the team lost. I am claiming that this is an incomplete characterization, and asking for your thoughts on the fuller description of what has happened.
If poor performance were the only reason he was fired, the University would be legally obligated to pay him the balance due under the terms of the contract.
The contract had provisions that if he were to be fired *for cause*, then the University would have no obligation to pay him further. The University has made such claims. This is the substance of the unsettled dispute. You have not yet used this language and not addressed this significant point.
The legal system has already accepted that there is valid dispute sufficient to entertain the matter through its mechanisms. To me, that suggests that parties could reasonably disagree on this matter. And that's what we have here. You seem not to regard this as valid, but instead find it self-evident that the exclusive reason for his termination was poor performance.
There is a difference between being fired for good/bad/any/no reason(s) and being fired "for cause." No matter how robust your argument is on the former, it doesn't give you license to ignore the latter, so that's what I asked you about.
FWIW, I don't believe for a second the narrative that UConn is stuck at $0 and won't budge either. Of the two parties I suspect that UConn is less likely to have unreasonable expectations.FWIW, I don't believe for a second the narrative that KO is stuck at $10M and won't budge. I'd expect the real number to be significant discount.
And you are basing that interpretation of the events on what exactly? FWIW "everyone knows" is code for "uh, I just made it up."I just don't like the false narrative that the school let him him go for x/y/z violations, when they really let him go because he was losing and the fan base was irate.
When it was all playing out, I thought the school looked far worse than KO. I thought to myself: "are they really going to try to do him like this?"
What a load of crap. Total and utter drivel. UConn was coming off 2 national championships in 4 years, one ostensibly under Ollie. And the top teams in the AAC were very good. Better than UConn. And good coaches build good programs wherever they are. Or have you never heard of Wichita State or Gonzaga or for that matter Xavier which became a power in the a10 Or Creighton which became one in the MVC. That Ollie couldn’t capitalize is on Ollie not the league.I think that Ollie's experience at UConn looks very different to people in coaching and the business of basketball.
Ollie showed incredible loyalty to UConn when he didn't bolt after the 2014 championship and decided to stay at a school that had received a virtual permanent exile from big time basketball when we got left behind in the AAC. The AAC was a death sentence for UConn athletics. Most of the world recognized that there was no way the athletic program could be successful as the northern outlier in a southern mid-major conference. I think Ollie, who won a National Championship as an assistant in 2011 and another one as a Head Coach in 2014, had a big enough ego that he thought that he could pull off being the Gonzaga of the AAC.
Ollie was wrong. He chased recruits that he could have easily closed in the Big East, but didn't want to play at a mid-major, and then he ended up scrambling for players like Gilbert that were literally damaged goods. Even a lot of the players he closed decided they didn't want to be at a cold weather school that had been bounced out of the big time. Ollie should have better calibrated which recruits he could close at a program that was sliding down the basketball hierarchy, but there isn't a text book for managing a program down the path to irrelevancy. The closest historical comparable was Houston post-Guy Lewis and post-SWC, and Houston didn't manage it well either.
NO UCONN COACH could have maintained any level of success in the AAC. This conference was going to destroy UConn athletics, and even though we are going back to the big time, it may be too late. Ollie was a casualty of the conference debacle as much as anything, and I will not hold him completely responsible for UConn basketball's decline post-2014.
Then, after all that, UConn walks away from a contract that it had promised Ollie when he had a lot of other offers. That will leave a bad taste in a lot of people's mouth, like Caron's.
KO was losing. Husky Nation wanted him gone. They fired him. Then UCONN tells us they fired him for NCAA violations. No, you didn't, you fired him because the fan base was upset and the team was losing.And you are basing that interpretation of the events on what exactly? FWIW "everyone knows" is code for "uh, I just made it up."
I disagree with the premise of your poll. UConn could have been a basketball power in the American, but Ollie couldn't get the job done for a number of reasons.Ok, fill in the blank.
It will be __________ for UCONN to beat lower ranked teams (or any team) as a member of the AAC, when compared to being a member of the BE.
a-easier
b-harder
c-just as easy
Husky nation didn't fire KO nor did I, UConn did. They wrote to him and outlined the basis for his dismissal. The facts contained therein were investigated and verified by an independent third party.KO was losing. Husky Nation wanted him gone. They fired him. Then they tell us they fired him for NCAA violations. No, you didn't, you fired him because the fan base was upset and the team was losing.
Yes. What I am saying is that he would have been fired with or without the violations - they weren't the real reason for him being relieved of his job. So to say that they were, in order to not pay him, is BS.Husky nation didn't fire KO nor did I, UConn did. They wrote to him and outlined the basis for his dismissal. The facts contained therein were investigated and verified by an independent third party.
So do you have anything other than your imagination that says otherwise?
So you have nothing, other than your imagination, to back up that statement. I see.Yes. What I am saying is that he would have been fired with or without the violations - they weren't the real reason for him being relieved of his job. So to say that they were, in order to not pay him, is BS.
So you have nothing, other than your imagination, to back up that statement. I see.
So you are back to saying "everybody knows" which is a tacit admission that you have no facts.The majority of UCONN fans that I speak with all know why KO got fired, and it wasn't for violations. The violations were the public excuse/reasoning that the school gave.
I am not ignoring the fact that violations occurred - they did. I am simply saying that those violations were merely the public reasoning the school gave for his firing, so they did not have to pay him the remainder. We all know that he got fired for the team's losing record and poor performance. If those reasons fall under the *for cause* definition, then the school owes him nothing. I just don't like the false narrative that the school let him him go for x/y/z violations, when they really let him go because he was losing and the fan base was irate. The way things played out, it was as if UCONN wanted to fire him, did so, and then went and found reasons to justify it when the real reason was losing. Where I work, this is like my boss firing me because I stink at my job, but then the company realizes it doesn't have to pay me a severance if they can prove I was doing things that they kinda sorta thought I was doing while employed, but never truly looked into, prior to firing me.
The way things played out, it was as if UCONN wanted to fire him, did so, and then went and found reasons to justify it when the real reason was losing. Where I work, this is like my boss firing me because I stink at my job, but then the company realizes it doesn't have to pay me a severance if they can prove I was doing things that they kinda sorta thought I was doing while employed, but never truly looked into, prior to firing me.
A great analogy, but I believe that KO was gone, regardless of the violations.A more apt analogy. Employee sucks at their job. Boss want to fire but can’t afford to hire a new employee AND pay severance. Boss is forced to keep employee until employee harasses a coworker. Boss no longer has to pay severance and can afford to let him go.
Ollie wouldn’t have been fired if he didn’t break the rules. Period.
Do you work for the University in some capacity? I feel like I'm dealing with UCONN's public relations department. Maybe you're on the AAUP legal team?So you are back to saying "everybody knows" which is a tacit admission that you have no facts.
"It's okay you can admit it. We all know."
And it is starting-"as for Butler, he should just shut up being that he didn’t play or coach with Ollie At U Conn. "Who on the board has turned on Caron Butler?
And the facts were the teams record, tournament performance, attendance, and thousands of irate emails from the fan base to the athletic department. Oh, and then there were those violations.So you are back to saying "everybody knows" which is a tacit admission that you have no facts.
"It's okay you can admit it. We all know."
Oh I’m assuming UConn made offers and never meant to suggest that I thought they were being unreasonable or unrealistic because I don’t know any details to make such a judgment.FWIW, I don't believe for a second the narrative that UConn is stuck at $0 and won't budge either. Of the two parties I suspect that UConn is less likely to have unreasonable expectations.
And it is starting-"as for Butler, he should just shut up being that he didn’t play or coach with Ollie At U Conn. "
From Freescooter.