- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,656
- Reaction Score
- 53,371
My point is that I don't think there's a difference between a 1 or 2 year contract in a recruit's mind. I'm also not saying that the lack of a contract isn't hurting recruiting. I just look at the football situation where many thought we were getting a good coach that was highly regarded by his peers (just like KO) and now those same people that liked the hire are screaming buyout and fire him/them. I don't want the same situation in hoops. If KO is as good as we think or hope he is, he'll get his contract, start recruiting with confidence and this will be a temporary blip on the radar. As of now we only lose Evans so the cupboard won't be bare. I don't think either Shabazz or Boat appear ready for the next level, at this point, not that that would stop them from declaring.
Coaches are always given the support of the department, whether they are worthy or not. In this instance, we have an AD speaking to the media about concerns he has about the coach.
That's not at all comparable to negative recruiting from others pointing out that a coach's 3 year-contract is a ruse or whatever. It's a very big deal. Again, look at Facey. The kid committed a long while ago. His father said that Herbst told them point blank that Ollie was taking over for Calhoun in the future (not this year, but beyond, 2013 or more). What more proof do you need? Isn't it obvious that Ollie's status is hurting us bigtime here?

......but 8893 can for sure!!