Big East TV Deal with FOX, TNT, and NBC | Page 22 | The Boneyard

Big East TV Deal with FOX, TNT, and NBC

Samoo said:
Um, no. All the info/data should be displayed, including the missing $4 million on the bottom of each bar. Shouldn't rely on an author with possible biases to decide where to cut off the data/information.
Expand ...
But there's no bias if you read the labels, which is the first thing you should do when reading a graph. This is like 1st grade level knowledge
 
navery12 said:
But there's no bias if you read the labels, which is the first thing you should do when reading a graph. This is like 1st grade level knowledge
Expand ...
And marketing is like high school and college level material, so it does in fact help to go to college after all. The general population is what it is.
 
huskymedic said:
They can withdraw before their junior year w/o penalty.
Expand ...
Talked with some friend of mine about this and he said that about 30% withdraw. One friend of his withdrew within weeks of graduation. Which can be done with the permission of the superintendent.
 
AZHuskiePop said:
Everyone in the MW is subject to the crazy $35,000:000 exit fee.
Expand ...
Not if a football-stronger majority of MW schools vote to disband. Don’t see it happening, but some suggest the possibility of a newly formed conference together with Pac2 and some stronger AAC schools.
 
LOL, we just signed a media deal for 25% Less than most expected with a bunch of games going to streaming and everyone says it’s great then argues over a graph. Gotta love the Yard.
 
7774 said:
So basically you're too dumb to read a simple chart. Cool, moving on.
Expand ...
Wow, what a mean-spirited reply. In addition, you appear wrong … this person clearly understands the data, but feels it is not properly being displayed.

To me, this data may or may not be properly displayed, based on what information the original author is trying to convey.

- if the intent is to simply show different $ distribution values, the chart is fine as is.

- if the intent is to explore relative equality of $ distribution (which I think WE are all discussing here), then the vertical axis clearly should go down to zero. The best way I would try to explain that to 7774 is … if we removed any $ values from the existing chart, it would incorrectly appear that UConn makes 4 times as much as DePaul.
 
.-.
Paint Touches did an additional article on the deal. Once again showing that the deal is good for any BE school that is not burdened by massive football budgets.


How does the the Big East TV contract compare to other power conferences?

image-7.png
 
MU in MKE said:
Paint Touches did an additional article on the deal. Once again showing that the deal is good for any BE school that is not burdened by massive football budgets.


How does the the Big East TV contract compare to other power conferences?

image-7.png
Expand ...

That shows it's a competitive deal if football is 85% of value and all other sports combined 15% of value. [The conference contract is for all sports, so the "CBB Cut" heading is misleading: the table ascribes 100% of the value of the BE contract to "CBB Cut". The table is only consistent between the BE and other conferences if the "CBB Cut" column is the value of everything other than football.]

But if you think 6 football games per year is worth less than 85% of major conference media value, then the BE got a poor deal.

And since the major conference revenue comes in significant part from dedicated cable networks that need round the clock content, I don't see how you can argue that 18 hours of football content per school delivers 85% of the value of a network that airs 8760 hours per year.
 
pj said:
That shows it's a competitive deal if football is 85% of value and all other sports combined 15% of value. [The conference contract is for all sports, so the "CBB Cut" heading is misleading: the table ascribes 100% of the value of the BE contract to "CBB Cut". The table is only consistent between the BE and other conferences if the "CBB Cut" column is the value of everything other than football.]

But if you think 6 football games per year is worth less than 85% of major conference media value, then the BE got a poor deal.

And since the major conference revenue comes in significant part from dedicated cable networks that need round the clock content, I don't see how you can argue that 18 hours of football content per school delivers 85% of the value of a network that airs 8760 hours per year.
Expand ...
There is no material value in anything else. If you go online during a UConn baseball game, there are never more than 200 people listening and most of the time it’s well under 100. You’re looking for an argument that is theoretically valid and in actuality meaningless. (Hey, I’m the lawyer, I should be the one doing that!)
 
MU in MKE said:
Paint Touches did an additional article on the deal. Once again showing that the deal is good for any BE school that is not burdened by massive football budgets.


How does the the Big East TV contract compare to other power conferences?

image-7.png
Expand ...

I like Paint Touches and generally think the work is pretty fair and accurate but the idea that Duke and UNC are only making $2.4M on the hoop contract and DePaul and Butler are making $7M is ridiculous.

You can't just apply a % like that and extrapolate it across different leagues and different contracts.
 
.-.
pj said:
That shows it's a competitive deal if football is 85% of value and all other sports combined 15% of value. [The conference contract is for all sports, so the "CBB Cut" heading is misleading: the table ascribes 100% of the value of the BE contract to "CBB Cut". The table is only consistent between the BE and other conferences if the "CBB Cut" column is the value of everything other than football.]

But if you think 6 football games per year is worth less than 85% of major conference media value, then the BE got a poor deal.

And since the major conference revenue comes in significant part from dedicated cable networks that need round the clock content, I don't see how you can argue that 18 hours of football content per school delivers 85% of the value of a network that airs 8760 hours per year.
Expand ...

I think the consensus is that football is 80-85% of the value of a media deal. Most attribute the rest to being basketball (mens and womens) as they're the only other positive ROI sport for almost every school. You can get more granular I'm sure, but the numbers would probably be a pretty low percent of the total for any other sport.
 
ConnHuskBask said:
I like Paint Touches and generally think the work is pretty fair and accurate but the idea that Duke and UNC are only making $2.4M on the hoop contract and DePaul and Butler are making $7M is ridiculous.

You can't just apply a % like that and extrapolate it across different leagues and different contracts.
Expand ...

That's fair, and I think they touch on that themselves and admit it's a pretty broad brush. That being said, a major point to note here is that the ACC deal really is indeed that bad.
 
MU in MKE said:
I think the consensus is that football is 80-85% of the value of a media deal. Most attribute the rest to being basketball (mens and womens) as they're the only other positive ROI sport for almost every school. You can get more granular I'm sure, but the numbers would probably be a pretty low percent of the total for any other sport.
Expand ...
Yeah, but in reality SEC football is likely a greater percentage of their total media deal than the ACC. If someone were to claim for example that based on value, the (football & basketball only) SEC media contract 88% football, 12% basketball whe the ACC is 79% football, 21% basketball, I'm not sure many would claim those percentages are off by a material amount.
 
FfldCntyFan said:
Yeah, but in reality SEC football is likely a greater percentage of their total media deal than the ACC. If someone were to claim for example that based on value, the (football & basketball only) SEC media contract 88% football, 12% basketball whe the ACC is 79% football, 21% basketball, I'm not sure many would claim those percentages are off by a material amount.
Expand ...
I agree. SEC TV and BIG TV contract’s are mainly for football.
 
If you look at Notre Dame’s ACC deal and their new NBC deal which is about 67 million, close to BIG 10 and SEC money, it gives you some sense of how this works. According to an analysis I read, they attribute $12 million to football and $5 to basketball, roughly a 70-30 split, but when you look at the overall payment football brings in $62 million of the $67 million ($50 million from NBC is all football. That leaves only 7.5% for basketball. Those are probably realistic ranges depending on the league and maybe even how the individual school allocated income. I would expect that the ACC earns a higher percentage for basketball while the SEC gets less.
 
.-.
two shockers above:
1) Lville still had highest revenue even though they won 8 games???
2) duke isnt' in the top 50??
 
UConnTrumbull said:
I believe UConn is only that low because of the Ollie money
Expand ...
optimistic. why would the ollie payment be factored in as opposed to any other expenses?
 
UConnTrumbull said:
I believe UConn is only that low because of the Ollie money
Expand ...
Ollie money is in the 2022 numbers for expenses. This is raw revenues taken from the sportico database:

www.sportico.com

Sportico’s Intercollegiate Finance Database

Sportico is maintaining an interactive, real-time database that tracks the official balance sheets of public FBS university athletic departments.
www.sportico.com www.sportico.com
 
.-.
bendm said:
two shockers above:
1) Lville still had highest revenue even though they won 8 games???
2) duke isnt' in the top 50??
Expand ...

It seems to be based on ticket revenue. Duke's Cameron Indoor is smaller than Gampel and they give free tickets to students. So not surprising that Duke's ticket revenue is less than UConn's, and UConn is #45.
 
SouthBayHusky said:
I don’t think that list is including any private schools. This may just be public.
Expand ...
Correct, Both Marquette and Creighton list over 14million in revenue and are not on that list. I believe both of their buildings are bigger than Gampel and XL.
 
Imagine what Louisville would have brought in if the program wasn't a dumpster fire the past couple of years.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,146
Messages
4,554,785
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom