Let me try to rephrase your question:
Because Ed Cooley switched jobs as a basketball coach, the trade off should be that people (who by their own admission don't know for certain) are allowed to make accusations about his personal life and marriage?
That doesn't seem a bit demented to you?
If someone went on video and had the balls to say I 100% know for a fact x happened which is why he left, I could at least respect it.
Citing message boards, twitter, a friend of a friend, is chicken ish.
You want to talk? Put your name on it.
Georgetown was allowed to hire Ed Cooley.
Ed Cooley was allowed to accept the job.
Many Providence fans were allowed to be angry about that.
Some of those partisans would appear to have made a bitter-edged mockumentary about Providence basketball that frames its story around Ed Cooley, and includes speculation & innuendo regarding Cooley's departure that to those fans felt abrupt, painful, and deceitful.
Those who watch the film are allowed to like or dislike, trust or distrust, approve or disapprove of any or all of the production quality, the story, the story's editorial slant & emphasis, the narrative's sourcing, and so on.
ESPN's ownership, management, and legal team are allowed to pursue any grievances they have with the product, its presentation, its distribution, its authenticity, its veracity, etc., and seek available remedies and damages if they believe it's in their shareholders' interests to do so.
In the alternative, on the off chance that this is genuine ESPN product, the same list can defend RSPN's interests.
Ed Cooley, Georgetown University, The Big East Conference, or any other party with any similar objections could act to protect itself from damage.
You're allowed to have your opinions on aspects that you've found bothersome, and others are allowed to agree or disagree with them, or have their own opinions.
The entire Cooley-to-Georgetown story only peripherally involves me (Conference rival drama) and barely affects me (not my team), so I don't need to give the matter much more than cursory attention. From what I saw & heard last spring, Cooley seems to have behaved with compromised integrity; it might titilate me or others to hear or say that what he did was "scummy;" and, as a general matter, rumors of marital infidelity are eternally the stuff of tabloid gossip, which almost always has appeal when attached to public figures.
I'm not lobbying for others to adopt my lower level depth of feeling or more blase point of view, and Içm disinclined to give much energy toward weighing whether or not things are demented, unworthy of respect, or chicken ish. You seem to feel differently. I'm ok with that