- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 30,624
- Reaction Score
- 53,225
Guys,
I am impressed with what you have shown me about your facilities but in no way are those the best in the country. Schools like Oregon simply have more money and better stuff then just about anybody. It seems like every team in the Big 12 is throwing hundreds of millions of dollars in facilities every few years just to try and keep up with the SEC teams who spend even more. That is what it takes to impress 18 year old kids apparently.
A couple things to consider:
1. UConn hosts a lot more sports than the B12 does. It needs a lot more facilities. Not only new football, but new basketball, men's and women's, soccer and ice hockey, etc. But of the BE schools which included teams like Louisville and southern schools like USF, UConn had the nicest facilities.
2. Here's what Robert Griffin had to say about UConn's stadium: http://espn.go.com/espn/thelife/vid...ii-talks-video-games-draft?readmore=fullstory
Robert Griffin III: The thing that people think is when you go to these big stadiums and they have 80,000 people or 100,000 people, that these are the toughest stadiums to play at, but really, those aren't. When you have that many people, most of the time, the fans are pretty far away from the field. The toughest places to play are the ones that are jam-packed, are really tight to the field, and sit about 45,000 people. When we played at UConn my freshman year, that was the loudest place I've ever been as a football player. The stands are right next to the field, it was packed, and everyone was yelling. That was probably the coolest place for me to play at aside from Texas, Texas A&M, and Nebraska.
3. Between new facilities, stadium for football, new facilities for men's and women's basketball, UConn and the state will have spent over $200m on athletic facilities, and that's BEFORE the hockey arena and baseball stadium are built.
