There is a lot to disagree about your post .
1) ND did not "cover up a rape" during " the run to the national championship".
Really? Aee you that clueless about your own school. Here are the links.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...04/why-i-wont-be-cheering-for-old-notre-dame/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/the-c...rity/notre-dame-case-highlight_b_2424480.html
In August 2010, 19-year-old freshman Lizzy Seeberg accused the athlete of sexually assaulting her in his dorm. She filed a report with campus police, which sat on it for two weeks before even interviewing him. By then, Seeberg had committed suicide. Administrators would later convene a closed-door campus disciplinary hearing--three months after Seeberg's death became national news--in which the player was found "not responsible." In the university's only direct comment on the case, Notre Dame's president, the Rev. John I. Jenkins, told the South Bend Tribune in December 2010 that university police had conducted a "thorough and judicious investigation that followed the facts..." He acknowledged, however, that the inquiry could have been conducted "more quickly, perhaps." The player, who has not been publicly identified, reportedly has never missed a game, nor presumably will he miss tonight's national championship contest with Alabama's Crimson Tide. Meanwhile, a small but vocal number of critics are asking pointed questions about how this case was handled, and wondering aloud whether Notre Dame's righteous rhetoric is really a fiction.
I think that you are referring to the Lizzie Seeberg allegation that a football player touched her breast. That was in 2010, not 2012. ND did not cover anything up.
So, it wasn't a rape, wasn't in 2012 and wasn't a cover up.
You have no clue what you are talking about.
( If you want to talk about a rape cover up, look to Michigan's 5 year cover up of an alleged rape by its kicker).
2) I don 't recall the specifics of the T 'eo catfishing or when ND knew it, it may have been a couple of days before the game . And ? Perhaps ND didn't want the players distracted for the game (not that it mattered, lol).
So now you are going to play dumb on this. REally? ND knew it was fake but never told ESPN and slowed them to report the story thought the NC game. Not sure how you can act like this is false, it is absolutely 100% true. Brian Kelly knew, your AD knew, and did nothing. They could have stepped up and told ESPN the truth instead o allowing them to report what ND knew was not true. As usual they did what was best for ND.
3) ND never promised to play 3 BE members on a rotating basis, never said which venues and was never a home/home promise.
Are you that clueless or just defending your team? Notre dame never kept their word, never played each of the BE teams. You need to brush up on your Notre Dame knowledge.
http://www.uhnd.com/blog/notre-dame-football/a-little-notre-dame-big-east-scheduling-news/
The independent Fighting Irish will return to what was a long-time series with Pitt in 2008, and will visit the Carrier Dome in Syracuse in ‘08 (returning a 2005 Orange visit to South Bend, Ind).
ND, a Big East member in conference sports except football (and part of the league’s second-tier bowl agreements) has committed to playing each of the Big East eight teams in a rotating schedule starting in 2011.
The plan has the Irish playing three foes annually (one home, one road, one at Giants Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J.).
“Other than Pitt (future series), there’s nothing set,” Carparelli said. “Notre Dame is talking with Rutgers, UConn, Cincinnati and USF right now.”
Rutgers and Notre Dame reportedly have discussed playing six consecutive years (2010-15).
It was three teams, period. It was not every team.
Wrong It was not a rotating basis promise
Wrong. Pitt was already one, ND played one game with USF and one with UConn .
What about the rest of the conference? Thanks for proving my point. Notre dame lied and you sir are clueless.
ND tried to schedule series with Rutgers and UConn but not as home/home, both turned down the terms ( their home games at Met Life and Gillette ). Both had good reasons, but that ended that.
4) The Declan Sullivan lift accident was a terrible tragedy but was exactly that, an accident. The Sullivan family worked with ND to promote lift safety, appreciated ND's response to Declan's death and agreed to a memorial to Declan on campus and a scholarship established by ND in his honor.
Hey you got one right!!! Good job.
So, you have a few facts wrong in your narrative above.
No, I proved I was right.
Did Notre Dame head up the Big East expansion committee? Then did they decide to leave the conference? Do you think that could be considered backstabbing since they were in charge of securing the future of the conference then immediately decided to leave for the ACC. That was cold blooded.