- Joined
- Dec 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,515
- Reaction Score
- 30,867
Any idea if any schools have been in touch?
While KenPom is great, it can be a bit wonky when it comes to positional breakdowns. Just look at ours, where they have Omar at the 4:
While KenPom is great, it can be a bit wonky when it comes to positional breakdowns. Just look at ours, where they have Omar at the 4:
![]()
That being said, between his size and skill set, Miller looks like he's a natural college 4. And as an added bonus, KenPom ranks him as the sixth best defensive rebounder in the country. Sign him up!
I think this kid would be a very nice get. Let's hope one of our more astute recruiting experts/posters tips off the staff and it at least acts as a secondary (if not primary) reinforcement of information to KO & Crew. Because this board is so heavily trafficked/enforced internally by the Einstein/Wooden type basketball minds of the world...it is my sincere hope we don't feed the trolls on this diamond of a prospect that only so many teams/coaches are aware of at the moment.
He is from the Cleveland area. I don't see any offers out of high school per ESPN ect...seemed to be set exclusively on Ivy.
Can someone please burst my bubble on this kid. He seems perfect. No?
That is a pretty fair analysis indeed...My only issue with him is that he takes a fair number of threes for someone who makes very few of them (28/104 last year). He's still reasonably efficient on offense because he gets to the line a lot, and he was great from the line last year (83%). If he can either cut down on those threes or get his success rate around 34% or so, he'll be a really valuable player.
I actually don't mind that. I'd take a capable shooter that takes too many 3s over someone who's just not a threat from deep. First, he was Cornell's go-to player, and often those players have less efficient numbers from the field because they're relied upon for bail out shots. Miller would not have that same role in our offense, and his ability to hit a 3 would greatly help our offensive spacing, which is critical with all of the slashers we have on our team.My only issue with him is that he takes a fair number of threes for someone who makes very few of them (28/104 last year). He's still reasonably efficient on offense because he gets to the line a lot, and he was great from the line last year (83%). If he can either cut down on those threes or get his success rate around 34% or so, he'll be a really valuable player.
@James @BLUEDOGHOUSE I'd never even heard of the kid before today, but I don't think anybody here would dispute that - for the second season in a row - the four is the biggest question mark heading into next year. The acquisition wouldn't by any stretch render kids like Facey or Lubin useless, but it would give us a much needed insurance policy against the possibility that those two do not get demonstrably better. Enoch? I have no idea.
As @CallMeBruce points out, 27% from three isn't ideal, especially when you're hoisting 3.5 per game. But, I think context is important here - Cornell ranked 309th in the country in offensive efficiency, which likely diluted the shot quality of the entire offense. Many of those looks were probably tightly contested, but if he came here, there is reason to believe he could shoot it at the aforementioned 34-35% clip. He won't be Niels Giffey, but teams will probably have to guard him...which is more than we can currently say about any of our other four men.
With Miller, though, I'm more intrigued by what he offers at the other end. Cornell ranked 79th in defensive efficiency, and given Miller ranked first in the Ivy League in defensive rating and swatted two shots per game, it's probably safe to say he was their anchor.
And perhaps most importantly of all, he can go get 'in ball off the backboard. I don't know if his shot blocking and scoring will translate...but rebounding is a skill that tends to be fairly reliable, and this team is desperately in need of a four who can rebound. That way, we can better live with rebounding deficiencies of our centers without compromising the infrastructure of our defense to do so (Hamilton can't guard fours and Facey still doesn't know where to be).
Again, all I can do on Miller is pour over his statistics, and I have no idea if there is mutual or even one-way interest. But this is the type of player - or at least the type of player I have created with my imagination - that is so critical to the teams success next season. He may only be an average AAC player, but even an average player can be valuable if they are able to stabilize the surrounding roster.
I know nothing about him, but dynamite shooter...not a great fit??? what am I missing?Dynamite shooter, but I'm not sure he's a great fit for us.
Wow. If that happens...I get the feeling people will start to better appreciate how good of a coach Cal is.
He's not active next year, but I think Kahlil Dukes could be that guy. Especially with 3 years under KO.Keep in mind almost none of these kids are going to be absolute studs à la Purvis - unless it's a coach firing or a graduate, odds are these kids are leaving because there's either a skill deficiency in some area that prevented them from being successful at their previous level or an attitude issue that rendered them incompatible with their previous coach. Even the grad transfers have a couple of flaws in their games too. We're not going to be the answers to all of our problems from transfers; I think a Lasan Kromah type is the best we can hope for.