- Joined
- Jun 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,716
- Reaction Score
- 33,339
Ray had the AUDACITY to shoot 47% on 3s and on 81% on free throws…We've had a couple of guys come close but nobody has done it yet, FT% seems to be the biggest culprit
View attachment 88318
Ray had the AUDACITY to shoot 47% on 3s and on 81% on free throws…We've had a couple of guys come close but nobody has done it yet, FT% seems to be the biggest culprit
View attachment 88318
He's a plug and play starter and a glue guy in a league that lacks his skill set.
I tend to agree with you. If I’m the Brooklyn Nets for example who have picks #21 and #22- they just hit the reset button and are beginning a new rebuild - I think a guy like Andre Jackson who is a A+ culture presence, winner, and potential high-level connective piece - is well worth one of those picks for my franchise.To me Dre is a player that will surprise on Draft night being picked higher than expected. Great teammate, high motor, unreal athleticism. He has a significant lid on his ceiling because of that shot but his floor is also very high. Once the prospects that have the ability to grow into MVP's if the cards fell right came off the board I think he's in play. He's a plug and play starter and a glue guy in a league that lacks his skill set. This will come as a surprise but I think he goes top 20. I'd be surprised if it's much higher than that but if he's sitting there in the mid 20's I'd be mildly surprised.
Andre's gone. He'll be a late 1st or early 2nd pick. Still don't think it's the right move as I think his stock value and development will be higher playing next year at UConn than ending up in the development league. Money will be better in the short-term though.
i didn’t say start, but he can hit shotsemoni bates tho, he’s gonna be on a team fora long time.
There's been a total of 11 players in college to hit 50/40/90 in college since '93. I won't say its impossible...but it's certainly improbable. Would be a heck of an accomplishmentHe was at 48/40/81 this year. To get to 14ppg he would need 2 more buckets per game. It really isn't that out of line. If you want me to be a little more realistic, I'll say 45/38/85... but that's silly to say instead of just using round numbers.
90% from the line is a tough ask. Hawkins was a freak shooter and hit 88%. I doubt Alex goes below 80%. He's a really, really good FT shooter.
I expect his FG% will drop because we should see him drive the ball more aggressively vs. tough defense.
I'm assuming that's CV's senior season at the bottom. Man such a shame that he came in during our worst years. Kid was AJ before AJ, just a hungry husky.We've had a couple of guys come close but nobody has done it yet, FT% seems to be the biggest culprit
View attachment 88318
I get the gist of NBA development > college development, but there’s a lot more shots to be had to actually work on his scoring here than at the NBA level where he won’t have the amount of control and green light as a young guy.His stock is what it is. The development thing is just not correct.
I get the gist of NBA development > college development, but there’s a lot more shots to be had to actually work on his scoring here than at the NBA level where he won’t have the amount of control and green light as a young guy.
It’d pretty much be like when he played with Martin and RJ Cole for him. That’s my fear and don’t think his offense can get better that way. If he comes back, he’ll have full control of the team to work on whatever he needs and guys who will trust him.
Junior season, he shot 90% on FTs his senior year but was under 40% on FGs and 34.4% from 3I'm assuming that's CV's senior season at the bottom. Man such a shame that he came in during our worst years. Kid was AJ before AJ, just a hungry husky.
That work isn’t going to mean much if he doesn’t get many game reps to work on it.I wasn't referring to games. I meant working with a professional coaching staff on a daily basis for an organization at least nominally invested in getting a return on their investment.
It's time to let it go, Andre is gone. And he'll get significantly more game reps when he goes too, the G League season is 50 games. He'll have plenty of opportunities to get his shots up, and the development he needs is going to come from practice anywayThat work isn’t going to mean much if he doesn’t get many game reps to work on it.
Even with Lonzo Ball, who’s kind of an okay comp for Andre, it took a lot of work and game reps to get the confidence to make his shot consistent. And a lot of patience because he’s the #2 pick and a PG who had the ball a lot. I’m not sure if Andre will have that kind of patience and investment to get the game reps he needs to be confident in his scoring.
We didn’t even see it here until the last stretch of the year. I would personally like to see him build on that for a year rather than going to the NBA without that confidence and foundation. But that doesn’t matter because he’s probably gone at this point.
FWIW Matisse Thybull played all 4 years and got drafted 1st round pick 20 and he doesn’t have the playmaking Andre has.
Lonzo Ball shot 41% on 5.5 three point attempts in his one season at UCLA. He made threes all the time off the bounce. Andre has a ton of trouble even creating a three and the midrange jumper isn't even a part of his offensive game. His scoring package is basically one hand floaters from outside the ft line and in.That work isn’t going to mean much if he doesn’t get many game reps to work on it.
Even with Lonzo Ball, who’s kind of an okay comp for Andre, it took a lot of work and game reps to get the confidence to make his shot consistent. And a lot of patience because he’s the #2 pick and a PG who had the ball a lot. I’m not sure if Andre will have that kind of patience and investment to get the game reps he needs to be confident in his scoring.
We didn’t even see it here until the last stretch of the year. I would personally like to see him build on that for a year rather than going to the NBA without that confidence and foundation. But that doesn’t matter because he’s probably gone at this point.
FWIW Matisse Thybull played all 4 years and got drafted 1st round pick 20 and he doesn’t have the playmaking Andre has.
Yeah he’s gone. But the G League is filled with guys who are fighting to make the NBA and guys aren’t going to look to get him the ball. If he’s not aggressive, it’ll look like his sophomore season again. Getting better in practice is not a thing in basketball if it doesn’t come with game reps.It's time to let it go, Andre is gone. And he'll get significantly more game reps when he goes too, the G League season is 50 games. He'll have plenty of opportunities to get his shots up, and the development he needs is going to come from practice anyway
That work isn’t going to mean much if he doesn’t get many game reps to work on it.
Even with Lonzo Ball, who’s kind of an okay comp for Andre, it took a lot of work and game reps to get the confidence to make his shot consistent. And a lot of patience because he’s the #2 pick and a PG who had the ball a lot. I’m not sure if Andre will have that kind of patience and investment to get the game reps he needs to be confident in his scoring.
We didn’t even see it here until the last stretch of the year. I would personally like to see him build on that for a year rather than going to the NBA without that confidence and foundation. But that doesn’t matter because he’s probably gone at this point.
FWIW Matisse Thybull played all 4 years and got drafted 1st round pick 20 and he doesn’t have the playmaking Andre has.
We’re on the same page there with Lonzo. Think they’re feel for the game is similar though as far as being able to impact it without scoring. But scoring wise yeah, Andre is different than Lonzo because he actually has to develop an ability to score, not just become a more efficient one.I disagree with the notion that “game reps” are the key for Andre. He has a completely broken jump shot that needs to be rebuilt by professionals, not “game reps.”
And again, Lonzo is a bad comparison, because there is no good comparison. Lonzo has a funky looking jump shot but he shoots it a lot and always has. In his last year at Chino Hills he shot something like 36% from three on more than 200 attempts. (On an absolutely crazy high school team that murdered everyone - those kids would pull up from 30 feet.). That’s not comparable to what Andre’s up against.
I disagree with the notion that “game reps” are the key for Andre. He has a completely broken jump shot that needs to be rebuilt by professionals, not “game reps.”
And again, Lonzo is a bad comparison, because there is no good comparison. Lonzo has a funky looking jump shot but he shoots it a lot and always has. In his last year at Chino Hills he shot something like 36% from three on more than 200 attempts. (On an absolutely crazy high school team that murdered everyone - those kids would pull up from 30 feet.). That’s not comparable to what Andre’s up against.