Or not, once you equalize for population size:
View attachment 53719
Oh the irony. We have a much more diverse population, and a lower death rate, than the nine European countries with national healthcare systems listed above us in this chart.
Or not, once you equalize for population size:
View attachment 53719
No, you aren't thinking broad enough. Simply looks at demographics. Right now, with lock down, our health system is coming apart at the seems in areas. We simply do not have the infrastructural capacity to pull this off.
Also, without a vaccine, herd immunity is physically impossible for something that one cannot 'beat'. It ain't chicken pox.
I mean, I realize I can't argue with someone who's advocating for higher percentages of people to die. At it's basic level, it's a form of eugenics. Very, very weird and immoral hill to die on.
You are being snow jobbed by impatient politicians and business interests, pushing that idea because they want things to start up.
Oh, and as @WingU-Conn states, since you've expressed caring about this particular topic in the past, you'll be killing off a higher percentage of black and poor folks. Which is probably a plus in the minds of some of our populace. And what he didn't mention, is these people have far less access to treatment than wealthier folks. More adverse outcomes. Again, eugenics.
If you are trusting the WHO with anything, I mean anything, you are doing it wrong. They have been on the wrong side of this from day 1. They continue to be. And not for nothing, but it's no surprise that China has significant influence over that organization.
And, the guidance given to local health departments for this flu may be artificially inflating the number of deaths that have actually been caused by this virus. The CDC guidance said if a patient who died was suspected of having this virus, no matter whether they were tested or not and no matter that there was no proof they had it, and despite the other underlying conditions they had, the death was to be counted as a Covid-19 death.
...
Increased randomized testing is showing as many as 15-20% of the population have contracted the virus, most with no symptoms, including many children and young adults. Instead of shutting down the schools it now appears they should have been kept open to speed the development of natural herd immunity.
the seasonal flu annually kills 30-60,000 people while the 2017-18 season saw 80,000 deaths, possibly more than we'll have from this virus: https://www.usnews.com/news/health-...e-died-of-flu-complications-last-season-in-us
Again, this goes to the ability of the staff to spot talent.
The thing is we just can't be certain on any numbers. They are reporting everthing a Covid death in some states. If you were already in heart failure or had a week to live with cancer and you test positive for Covid, you are listed as a Covid death. Other areas seem to be underreporting.You're very wrong about a lot of this. Deaths aren't being overreported. If anything, they are being underreported. Pneumonia deaths are in some places 1.5x their usual. You think that is a coincidence? You're regurgitating a speculative talking point with no evidence.
Spike in US deaths and cases flagged as pneumonia suggests even greater COVID-19 impact
An analysis of CDC data suggests that COVID-19's death toll in the U.S. has been much worse than reported. Pneumonia cases are a clue as to why.www.usatoday.com
You think way more of the population has it than we currently know and yet at the same time you think there's been an overreporting of deaths? It's not a cogent position.
Seasonal flu has an epidemiologist estimated IFR (total infection fatality rate, not just confirmed cases) of 0.04%.
Already more than 0.15% of New York City has died of COVID (confirmed, not including presumed). So that's the absolute baseline of IFR at 4x the rate of seasonal flu. Anitbody testing shows that likely only ~20% of NYC has had the virus so far, putting the IFR actually at 5x higher than 0.15% = 0.75%. So that's about 19x the flu's death rate.
Confirmed case fatality rate (CFR) of the flu is annually estimated around 0.1%. So far we're at 5.9% and rising for COVID (as patients who were confirmed as cases earlier later die). So that's 50x+ the flu's CFR.
If we keep deaths below that of a bad flu pandemic (80k), then we've really done our job with social distancing. All infectivity studies I've seen have shown COVID as more contagious than influenza. So if we let COVID get to the same attack rate of the population as yearly influenza (essentially no social distancing), using that conservative 19x (0.75% IFR) number we'd expect 1.1 million deaths instead of 60k. That would be the same as COMBINING the #1 and #2 yearly causes of human death in the US (heart disease and cancer).
Stop comparing COVID deaths to the flu when thinking about policy. It does a disservice to any good points you make.
One interesting thing that is going on is flu deaths took a precipitous drop as soon as Covid deaths started going up. There’s probably some under reporting and over reporting happening there.The thing is we just can't be certain on any numbers. They are reporting everthing a Covid death in some states. If you were already in heart failure or had a week to live with cancer and you test positive for Covid, you are listed as a Covid death. Other areas seem to be underreporting.
It would seem the numbers would be higher because there looks to be excess deaths but we also know people are dying at home from other diseases because they're scared to got to hospitals because of Covid.
There are a whole bunch of different things going on.
Or social distancing limited the transmission of the flu but covid19 is more contagious and has a higher death rate than the flu (like they told us).One interesting thing that is going on is flu deaths took a precipitous drop as soon as Covid deaths started going up. There’s probably some under reporting and over reporting happening there.