Is there anyone who believes Serena, a 23 time winner in the slams, has to cheat to win? That she really needs coaching in the middle of a match?
Is she not treated different when she says she’s given several more drug tests than the other players
The problem seems to have started with the officials being inconsistent wether to enforce not coaching from the sidelines
Your all right just take emotions out of sports just play like robots .thats what I want to see
Did you hear the Announcers Pam Shriver and Chrissie Everett said coaches coach in matches all the tine but rarely called , I’m guessing you didn’t since you said you only watched the highlights so I think you were better off when you were stepping away cause you didn’t know what you talking about keep it up .Nonsense. He was officiating a single match. Only one player violated the rules. Serena is awesome, both as a player and as a person, but she was wildly out of line. Even good people make bad decisions. She did, and she should own it.
So frustration in here game by breaking a racket is bad sportsmanship. Really
So you are encouraging people to lie Just I thought do what is best for you at cost.While I am in the "Serena Deserved It" camp, I do think her coach should have backed up her story (true or not). You should expect a level of loyalty from your coach. The problem is that her coach is maybe too honest (she had issues with him before) and he is always ready to give out quotes (although I think his analysis is generally brilliant)
Tennis great Serena Williams needs a new coach
I am predicting a separation of coach and player.
Did you hear the Announcers Pam Shriver and Chrissie Everett said coaches coach in matches all the tine but rarely called , I’m guessing you didn’t since you said you only watched the highlights so I think you were better off when you were stepping away cause you didn’t know what you talking about keep it up .
My point is they don’t call it so call it all the time or get rid of the rule do we know that Osaka’s coach wasn’t coaching
Osaka clearly outplayed her, but it wasn't a good look for the US Open/game today. Unfortunate because Osaka really deserved all the accolades. Granted, if Osaka really wanted to avoid the controversy, she could have refused the Serena penalty and the powers be would have probably accepted to avoid a greater controversy.
I truly love your points and often to avoid things getting worse it is best to just walk away.I'm not a big tennis fan by any means but I recognize Serena's greatness. As a passive observer, I wanted to see her win. Sort of like rooting for Tiger, although I'm not a golf fan, either. Serena had a right to be angry, I guess, since rules are not always rules. I get that. But in my profession we teach children and adults that sometimes you just have to walk away and "let go". This is not any easy thing to do but had Serena just accepted the warning, like it or not, we wouldn't be having this discussion today. However, she exacerbated the situation not once, but twice, resulting in the loss of a game. In a NYT article this morning Naomi states that she was confused about what was going on and was surprised to see the 5-3 score in her favor following Serena's meltdown. To expect a young shy, relatively inexperienced 20-year-old to have requested the judge change the score is just ridiculous. As a passive observer, I'm left with the image of a young champion in tears, apologizing to the booing crowd for beating her idol. Really? To Serena's credit, she tried to calm the crowd down but she bears some responsibility for its actions. A joyous moment stolen from a young player. The crowd booing as she tried to hide her tears with a towel. This is what I'll remember.
I have witnessed (once in person) several prior Serena outbursts where I would have agreed with the negative views of her being expressed here but not this time.
First, I think chair umpire showed extremely bad judgment to give official warning to Serena on the coaching violation regardless of what Patrick Mouratoglou, her coach, admittedly was trying to signal to her because this was second set of a grand slam final and this violation is exceedingly rarely called even though coaching of this type is exceedingly common.
Second, chair umpire showed even worse judgment in taking away a game from Serena that thereby left her opponent one game away from winning the championship where Serena did not even use foul language.
Third, I will add that, in my view and it’s a view which I understand is not universal, there is no way a male player of a stature in the game equivalent to Serena Williams (and that really means only Federer) would have been formally warned for the coaching violation, much less had the penultimate game of a grand slam final awarded to his opponent for a verbal outburst that did not include any swearing.
Fourth, I think Serena showed great control in not simply walking away after the tournament referee refused to overrule the chair umpire decision to take away a game from her particularly when apparently many in her box were urging her to do just that.
Last, Serena showed class and dignity at the awards ceremony by telling the crowd to stop booing and to celebrate Naomi Osaka especially when, whatever one’s view of the merits, Serena clearly continued to believe in her own mind she had been unfairly and inequitably treated.
So frustration in here game by breaking a racket is bad sportsmanship. Really[/QUOTE
Apparently not in this day and age.
I have witnessed (once in person) several prior Serena outbursts where I would have agreed with the negative views of her being expressed here but not this time.
First, I think chair umpire showed extremely bad judgment to give official warning to Serena on the coaching violation regardless of what Patrick Mouratoglou, her coach, admittedly was trying to signal to her because this was second set of a grand slam final and this violation is exceedingly rarely called even though coaching of this type is exceedingly common.
Second, chair umpire showed even worse judgment in taking away a game from Serena that thereby left her opponent one game away from winning the championship where Serena did not even use foul language.
Third, I will add that, in my view and it’s a view which I understand is not universal, there is no way a male player of a stature in the game equivalent to Serena Williams (and that really means only Federer) would have been formally warned for the coaching violation, much less had the penultimate game of a grand slam final awarded to his opponent for a verbal outburst that did not include any swearing.
Fourth, I think Serena showed great control in not simply walking away after the tournament referee refused to overrule the chair umpire decision to take away a game from her particularly when apparently many in her box were urging her to do just that.
Last, Serena showed class and dignity at the awards ceremony by telling the crowd to stop booing and to celebrate Naomi Osaka especially when, whatever one’s view of the merits, Serena clearly continued to believe in her own mind she had been unfairly and inequitably treated.
I t probably would be to her advantage. But the point is moot as she does not set the rules of women's tennis. the whole thing was a mess, and took away from the integrity of the match and the sport. Unfortunate and avoidable. The kid played well and deserved the win.Playing best three out of five sets would be to Serena's advantage.